BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: The long-term outcomes of aortic valve-sparing (AVS) root replacement in Marfan syndrome (MFS) patients remain uncertain. The study aim was to determine the utilization and outcomes of AVS root replacement in MFS patients enrolled in the Registry of Genetically Triggered Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms and Cardiovascular Conditions (GenTAC). METHODS: At the time of this analysis, 788 patients with MFS were enrolled in the GenTAC Registry, of whom 288 had undergone aortic root replacement. Patients who had undergone AVS procedures were compared to those who had undergone aortic valve replacement (AVR). RESULTS: AVS root replacement was performed in 43.5% of MFS patients, and the frequency of AVS was increased over the past five years. AVS patients were younger at the time of surgery (31.0 versus 36.3 years, p = 0.006) and more likely to have had elective rather than emergency surgery compared to AVR patients, in whom aortic valve dysfunction and aortic dissection was the more likely primary indication for surgery. After a mean follow up of 6.2 +/- 3.6 years, none of the 87 AVS patients had required reoperation; in contrast, after a mean follow up of 10.5 +/- 7.6 years, 11.5% of AVR patients required aortic root reoperation. Aortic valve function has been durable, with 95.8% of AVS patients having aortic insufficiency that was graded as mild or less. CONCLUSION: AVS root replacement is performed commonly among the MFS population, and the durability of the aortic repair and aortic valve function have been excellent to date. These results justify a continued use of the procedure in an elective setting. The GenTAC Registry will be a useful resource to assess the long-term durability of AVS root replacement in the future.
BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: The long-term outcomes of aortic valve-sparing (AVS) root replacement in Marfan syndrome (MFS) patients remain uncertain. The study aim was to determine the utilization and outcomes of AVS root replacement in MFSpatients enrolled in the Registry of Genetically Triggered Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms and Cardiovascular Conditions (GenTAC). METHODS: At the time of this analysis, 788 patients with MFS were enrolled in the GenTAC Registry, of whom 288 had undergone aortic root replacement. Patients who had undergone AVS procedures were compared to those who had undergone aortic valve replacement (AVR). RESULTS:AVS root replacement was performed in 43.5% of MFSpatients, and the frequency of AVS was increased over the past five years. AVSpatients were younger at the time of surgery (31.0 versus 36.3 years, p = 0.006) and more likely to have had elective rather than emergency surgery compared to AVR patients, in whom aortic valve dysfunction and aortic dissection was the more likely primary indication for surgery. After a mean follow up of 6.2 +/- 3.6 years, none of the 87 AVSpatients had required reoperation; in contrast, after a mean follow up of 10.5 +/- 7.6 years, 11.5% of AVR patients required aortic root reoperation. Aortic valve function has been durable, with 95.8% of AVSpatients having aortic insufficiency that was graded as mild or less. CONCLUSION:AVS root replacement is performed commonly among the MFS population, and the durability of the aortic repair and aortic valve function have been excellent to date. These results justify a continued use of the procedure in an elective setting. The GenTAC Registry will be a useful resource to assess the long-term durability of AVS root replacement in the future.
Authors: Vincent L Gott; Duke E Cameron; Diane E Alejo; Peter S Greene; Jay G Shake; David J Caparrelli; Harry C Dietz Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Scott A LeMaire; Stacey A Carter; Irina V Volguina; Anne T Laux; Dianna M Milewicz; Garry W Borsato; Catherine K Cheung; John Bozinovski; Jennifer M Markesino; William K Vaughn; Joseph S Coselli Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Irina V Volguina; D Craig Miller; Scott A LeMaire; Laura C Palmero; Xing Li Wang; Heidi M Connolly; Thoralf M Sundt; Joseph E Bavaria; Harry C Dietz; Dianna M Milewicz; Joseph S Coselli Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: H C Dietz; G R Cutting; R E Pyeritz; C L Maslen; L Y Sakai; G M Corson; E G Puffenberger; A Hamosh; E J Nanthakumar; S M Curristin Journal: Nature Date: 1991-07-25 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Barbara L Kroner; H Eser Tolunay; Craig T Basson; Reed E Pyeritz; Kathryn W Holmes; Cheryl L Maslen; Dianna M Milewicz; Scott A LeMaire; Tabitha Hendershot; Patrice Desvigne-Nickens; Richard B Devereux; Harry C Dietz; Howard K Song; Danny Ringer; Megan Mitchell; Jonathan W Weinsaft; William Ravekes; Victor Menashe; Kim A Eagle Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Bart L Loeys; Harry C Dietz; Alan C Braverman; Bert L Callewaert; Julie De Backer; Richard B Devereux; Yvonne Hilhorst-Hofstee; Guillaume Jondeau; Laurence Faivre; Dianna M Milewicz; Reed E Pyeritz; Paul D Sponseller; Paul Wordsworth; Anne M De Paepe Journal: J Med Genet Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 6.318
Authors: Maria Elena Soto; Eric Ochoa-Hein; Javier E Anaya-Ayala; Micaela Ayala-Picazo; Solange Gabriela Koretzky Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2021-08 Impact factor: 3.005
Authors: Campbell D Flynn; David H Tian; Ashley Wilson-Smith; Tirone David; George Matalanis; Martin Misfeld; Stefano Mastrobuoni; Gebrine El Khoury; Tristan D Yan Journal: Ann Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2017-11