Literature DB >> 25296080

Laparoscopy versus laparotomy in the repair of ventral hernias: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Paula Marcela Vilela Castro1, Janayna Thainá Rabelato1, Gustavo Gomes Ribeiro Monteiro1, Guilherme Ciconelli del Guerra1, Mônica Mazzurana2, Guines Antunes Alvarez2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the laparotomy and laparoscopy techniques for correction of ventral hernia when related to perioperative complications, length of hospitalization, surgical time, and recurrence of hernia.
METHODS: This was a systematic review of randomized controlled trials, which included studies retrieved from four databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane and LILACS), using a combination of the terms (Hernia, Ventral) and (Laparoscopy) and (Laparotomy).
RESULTS: Six randomized trials were included, totaling 566 patients, 283 in the Laparoscopy group and 283 in the Laparotomy group. Laparoscopy reduced the risk of infection of the surgical wound (NNT = 5) and seroma formation (NNT = 13) and less length hospitalization (P = 0.02) compared to laparotomy in the correction of ventral hernias. Furthermore, laparoscopy increased the incidence of enterotomy (NNH = 25) and post operative pain (NNH = 8) and longer surgical time (P = 0.0009) when compared with laparotomy. There was no difference related to abscess (P = 0.79), hematoma (P = 0.43) and recurrency of ventral hernias (P = 0.25).
CONCLUSIONS: In the correction of ventral hernias, the use of laparoscopic technique is effective to reduce infections of the surgical wound and seroma formation, as well as, decrease the length hospitalization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25296080     DOI: 10.1590/s0004-2803201400030008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arq Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0004-2803


  8 in total

Review 1.  Does negative pressure wound therapy applied to closed incisions following ventral hernia repair prevent wound complications and hernia recurrence? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Edward W Swanson; Hsu-Tang Cheng; Srinivas M Susarla; Denver M Lough; Anand R Kumar
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 0.947

2.  Pooled data analysis of primary ventral (PVH) and incisional hernia (IH) repair is no more acceptable: results of a systematic review and metanalysis of current literature.

Authors:  C Stabilini; G Cavallaro; P Dolce; S Capoccia Giovannini; F Corcione; M Frascio; M Sodo; G Merola; U Bracale
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 3.  Primary non-complicated midline ventral hernia: is laparoscopic IPOM still a reasonable approach?

Authors:  S Van Hoef; T Tollens
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  The Use of Mesh in Emergent Ventral Hernia Repair: Effects on Early Patient Morbidity and Mortality.

Authors:  Ivy N Haskins; Richard L Amdur; Paul P Lin; Khashayar Vaziri
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Is pooled data analysis of ventral and incisional hernia repair acceptable?

Authors:  Ferdinand Köckerling; Christine Schug-Paß; Daniela Adolf; Wolfgang Reinpold; Bernd Stechemesser
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2015-05-12

Review 6.  Current Trends in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair.

Authors:  Evangelos P Misiakos; Paul Patapis; Nick Zavras; Panagiotis Tzanetis; Anastasios Machairas
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

7.  Surgical injury: comparing open surgery and laparoscopy by markers of tissue damage.

Authors:  Jan Máca; Matúš Peteja; Petr Reimer; Ondřej Jor; Věra Šeděnková; Lucie Panáčková; Peter Ihnát; Michal Burda; Pavel Ševčík
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 2.423

8.  A systematic review on surgical treatment of primary epigastric hernias.

Authors:  L Blonk; Y A Civil; R Kaufmann; J C F Ket; S van der Velde
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 4.739

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.