| Literature DB >> 25296025 |
Daniel J Smith1, Geoffrey R Hill2, Scott C Bell3, David W Reid1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Primary defects in host immune responses have been hypothesised to contribute towards an inability of subjects with cystic fibrosis (CF) to effectively clear pulmonary infections. Innate T-lymphocytes provide rapid pathogen-specific responses prior to the development of classical MHC class I and II restricted T-cell responses and are essential to the initial control of pulmonary infection. We aimed to examine the relationship between peripheral blood lymphocyte phenotype and clinical outcomes in adults with CF.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25296025 PMCID: PMC4190362 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109891
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Subject demographics.
| Healthy Controls | Cystic Fibrosis | P value | |
| Sex (Female:Male) | 11∶11 | 17∶24 | 0.5 |
| Age (years) | 26 (25–32) | 28 (22–32) | 0.9 |
| BMI (kg/metre2) | 24.6 (21.4–28.3) | 23.5 (20.5–25.8) | 0.3 |
| FEV1 (Litres) | 4.1 (3.5–4.7) | 2.2 (1.4–2.5) | <0.001 |
| FEV1% Predicted (%) | 110 (101–120) | 58 (37–75) | <0.001 |
| FVC (Litres) | 4.9 (4.4–5.7) | 3.1 (2.6–4.1) | <0.001 |
| FVC % Predicted (%) | 107 (95–112) | 76 (58–84) | <0.001 |
|
| |||
| F508del Homozygotes | 20 | ||
| F508del Heterozygotes | 18 | ||
| Other mutations | 3 | ||
|
| |||
|
| 36 | ||
|
| 12 | ||
|
| 5 | ||
|
| 4 | ||
|
| 3 | ||
|
| 2 | ||
|
| 2 | ||
|
| 1 | ||
|
| 1 | ||
|
| 1 | ||
| Methicillin resistant | 1 |
Data presented as median (interquartile range).
*Summary data, subjects may have had more than one pathogen isolated in sputum, individual microbiological data available in Table S1 in File S2.
Comparison of lymphocyte sub-sets between CF and healthy control subjects.
| Lymphocyte Population (size gated, CD14−) | CF (n = 41) | Non-CF (n = 22) | P-Value |
|
|
|
| 0.6 |
| CD4+CD8− | 65.2 (56.1–70.5) | 65.1 (59.9–71.4) | 0.6 |
| CD8+CD4− | 25.7 (21.1–32.5) | 27.4 (22.7–32.8) | 0.6 |
| MAIT Cells (CD161+, TCR Va7.2+) | 1.1 (0.4–1.9) | 2.0 (1.4–3.1) |
|
| γ/δ T-cells (TCR γ/δ+) | 10.4 (6.5–13.4) | 6.4 (4.6–9.4) |
|
| CD4+CD8+ | 0.3 (0.2–1.0) | 0.4 (0.3–1.7) | 0.1 |
| CD4−CD8− | 2.1 (0.9–3.3) | 1.6 (1.1–2.3) | 0.3 |
|
|
|
| 0.1 |
| Non-Resting (CD1c−) | 64.6 (57.0–74.4) | 71.6 (60.5–75.1) | 0.5 |
| Resting (CD1c+) | 35.0 (24.8–43. | 28.1 (25.0–38.3) | 0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
| CD16+CD56dim HLA-DR− | 75.1 (61.0–86.7) | 88.0 (84.7–92.6) |
|
| CD16−CD56+HLA-DR− | 8.9 (6.1–13.2) | 6.1 (4.5–9.1) |
|
| CD16−CD56+HLA-DR+ | 14.4 (5.1–24.1) | 4.3 (2.7–9.2) |
|
|
|
|
| 0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
*After exclusion of MAIT and γ/δ T-cells. Values expressed as percentage of parent population, Median (interquartile range). Significance of between group differences determined by Mann-Whitney U test.
Lymphocyte sub-set phenotypes in CF subjects based on the presence of P. aeruginosa infection compared to healthy control subjects.
| CF, No | CF, | P-Value∧ | Non-CF (n = 22) | P-Value$ | |
| Sex (Female:Male) | 3∶2 | 14∶22 | 0.4 | 11∶11 | 1.0 |
| Age (years) | 23.3 (18.4–41.7) | 28 (24.5–32.6) | 0.8 | 26 (25–32) | 0.5 |
| BMI (kg/metre2) | 24.7 (19.9–31.7) | 23.4 (20.5–25.3) | 0.5 | 24.6 (21.4–28.3) | 0.8 |
| FEV1% Predicted (%) | 72.4 (59.1–88.8) | 63.6 (43.4–80.1) | 0.3 | 110 (101–120) |
|
| FVC % Predicted (%) | 83.9 (68.1–95.9) | 79.3 (71.1–88.7) | 0.5 | 107 (95–112) |
|
| Lymphocyte Population (size gated, CD14−) | |||||
|
|
|
| 0.4 |
| 0.3 |
| CD4+CD8− | 64.4 (49.6–70.0) | 65.2 (56.9–70.5) | 0.6 | 65.1 (59.9–71.4) | 0.5 |
| CD8+CD4− | 26.2 (22.8–38.8) | 25.1 (20.5–33.1) | 0.6 | 27.4 (22.7–32.8) | 0.9 |
| MAIT Cells (CD161+, TCR Va7.2+) | 2.4 (1.4–3.6) | 1.0 (0.3–1.8) |
| 2.0 (1.4–3.1) | 1.0 |
| γ/δ T-cells (TCR γ/δ+) | 8.0 (6.0–16.0) | 10.5 (6.6–13.4) | 0.7 | 6.4 (4.6–9.4) | 0.2 |
| CD4+CD8+ | 0.2 (0.2–0.2) | 0.3 (0.2–1.1) |
| 0.4 (0.3–1.7) |
|
| CD4−CD8−* | 3.1 (1.6–4.1) | 2.1 (0.7–2.8) | 0.2 | 1.6 (1.1–2.3) | 0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Non-Resting (CD1c−) | 74.5 (69.1–79.0) | 64.1 (55.5–73.7) | 0.1 | 71.6 (60.5–75.1) | 0.1 |
| Resting (CD1c+) | 24.9 (20.3–30.5) | 35.9 (25.3–43.9) | 0.1 | 28.1 (25.0–38.3) | 0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| CD16+CD56dim HLA-DR− | 69.2 (48.5–80.9) | 76.1 (63.8–88.1) | 0.2 | 88.0 (84.7–92.6) |
|
| CD16−CD56+HLA-DR− | 10.9 (7.1–14.5) | 8.5 (6.1–13.3) | 0.5 | 6.1 (4.5–9.1) |
|
| CD16−CD56+HLA-DR+ | 21.4 (10.8–37.4) | 14.2 (4.5–23.8) | 0.2 | 4.3 (2.7–9.2) |
|
|
|
|
| 0.4 |
| 0.9 |
|
|
|
| 0.017 |
|
|
∧CF No P. aeruginosa versus CF P. aeruginosa infection. $CF No P. aeruginosa versus Non-CF. *After exclusion of MAIT and γ/δ T-cells. Values expressed as percentage of parent population, Median (interquartile range). Significance of between group differences determined by Mann-Whitney U test.
Figure 1MAIT Cell percentage in CF subjects based on A. Presence of P. aeruginosa in sputum cultures, B. Clinical status.
PE: pulmonary exacerbations, *two and ∧one not infected with P. aeruginosa, between group differences determined by Mann-Whitney U test.
Lymphocyte sub-sets in CF subjects based on clinical stability and compared to healthy control subjects.
| CF, Pulmonary exacerbation (n = 8) | CF, Stable (n = 13) | P-Value∧ | Non-CF (n = 22) | P-Value$ | |
| Sex (Female:Male) | 1∶7 | 8∶5 |
| 11∶11 | 0.5 |
| Age (years) | 32.2 (30.1–39.1) | 22.7 (20.5–26.9) |
| 26 (25–32) |
|
| BMI (kg/metre2) | 24.6 (23.5–26.0) | 23.0 (21.5–27.0) | 0.4 | 24.6 (21.4–28.3) | 0.7 |
| FEV1% Predicted (%) | 49.7 (40.3–68.5) | 83.2 (74.1–88.8) |
| 110 (101–120) |
|
| FVC % Predicted (%) | 74.6 (71.2–79.3) | 90.0 (85.9–96.4) |
| 107 (95–112) |
|
| Lymphocyte Population (size gated, CD14−) | |||||
|
|
|
| 0.6 |
| 0.3 |
| CD4+CD8− | 65.9 (52.2–76.2) | 58.3 (55.3–68.9) | 0.5 | 65.1 (59.9–71.4) | 0.1 |
| CD8+CD4− | 23.8 (16.4–37.8) | 29.2 (23.6–35.3) | 0.3 | 27.4 (22.7–32.8) | 0.7 |
| MAIT Cells (CD161+, TCR Va7.2+) | 1.1 (0.3–2.1) | 1.1 (0.9–1.9) | 0.7 | 2.0 (1.4–3.1) |
|
| γ/δ T-cells (TCR γ/δ+) | 11.1 (7.1–16.5) | 10.5 (6.4–13.6) | 0.8 | 6.4 (4.6–9.4) |
|
| CD4+CD8+ | 0.2 (0.2–1.0) | 0.2 (0.2–0.3) | 0.5 | 0.4 (0.3–1.7) |
|
| CD4−CD8−* | 2.6 (1.4–3.5) | 2.2 (1.3–3.4) | 0.6 | 1.6 (1.1–2.3) | 0.1 |
|
|
|
| 0.3 |
|
|
| Non-Resting (CD1c−) | 73.4. (65.5–79.9) | 70.4 (59.9–79.9) | 0.8 | 71.6 (60.5–75.1) | 0.7 |
| Resting (CD1c+) | 25.6 (19.9–34.1) | 29.3 (18.1–40.1) | 0.8 | 28.1 (25.0–38.3) | 0.7 |
|
|
|
| 0.7 |
|
|
| CD16+CD56dim HLA-DR− | 70.7 (52.9–83.7) | 69.2 (55.3–80.5) | 0.9 | 88.0 (84.7–92.6) |
|
| CD16−CD56+HLA-DR− | 9.9 (8.6–12.6) | 8.0 (6.7–13.3) | 0.6 | 6.1 (4.5–9.1) |
|
| CD16−CD56+HLA-DR+ | 19.4 (5.8–37.2) | 21.4 (13.2–30.6) | 0.8 | 4.3 (2.7–9.2) |
|
|
|
|
| 1.0 |
| 0.7 |
|
|
|
| 0.6 |
|
|
∧CF pulmonary exacerbation versus CF stable, $CF stable versus Non-CF. *After exclusion of MAIT and γ/δ T-cells. Values expressed as percentage of parent population, Median (interquartile range). Significance of between group differences determined by Mann-Whitney U test.
Figure 2Relationship between MAIT and γ/δ T-cell counts and percentages with lung function.
A. Pearson’s Correlation co-efficient (r) and significance value (p) of MAIT and γ/δ T-cells and B. Correlation plots for MAIT Cell expressed as percentage of T-cell population, with FEV1 and FVC % predicted, C-reactive protein and body mass index. MAIT: Mucosal invariant T-Lymphocytes, γ/δ T-Cell: Gamma-Delta T-lymphocytes, FEV1: Forced expiratory volume in one second, FVC: Forced vital capacity.