OBJECTIVES: The annual costs of US maternity-related hospitalizations exceed $27 billion. Continuous labor support from a trained doula is associated with improved outcomes and potential cost savings. This study aimed to document the relationship between doula support, desire for doula support, and cesarean delivery, distinguishing cesarean deliveries without a definitive medical indication. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a nationally representative survey of women who delivered a singleton baby in a US hospital in 2011- 2012 (N = 2400). METHODS: Multivariable logistic regression analysis of characteristics associated with doula support and desire for doula support; similar models examine the relationship between doula support, desire for doula support, and 1) any cesarean or 2) nonindicated cesarean. RESULTS: Six percent of women reported doula care during childbirth. Characteristics associated with desiring but not having doula support were black race (vs white; adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.77; 95% CI,1.03-3.03), and publicly insured or uninsured (vs privately insured; AOR = 1.83, CI, 1.17-2.85; AOR = 2.01, CI, 1.07-3.77, respectively). Doula-supported women had lower odds of cesarean compared without doula support and those who desired but did not have doula support (AOR = 0.41, CI, 0.18-0.96; and AOR = 0.31, CI, 0.13-0.74). The odds of nonindicated cesarean were 80-90% lower among doula-supported women (AOR= 0.17, CI, 0.07-0.39; and AOR= 0.11, CI, 0.03-0.36). CONCLUSIONS: Women with doula support have lower odds of nonindicated cesareans than those who did not have a doula as well as those who desired but did not have doula support. Increasing awareness of doula care and access to support from a doula may facilitate decreases in nonindicated cesarean rates.
OBJECTIVES: The annual costs of US maternity-related hospitalizations exceed $27 billion. Continuous labor support from a trained doula is associated with improved outcomes and potential cost savings. This study aimed to document the relationship between doula support, desire for doula support, and cesarean delivery, distinguishing cesarean deliveries without a definitive medical indication. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a nationally representative survey of women who delivered a singleton baby in a US hospital in 2011- 2012 (N = 2400). METHODS: Multivariable logistic regression analysis of characteristics associated with doula support and desire for doula support; similar models examine the relationship between doula support, desire for doula support, and 1) any cesarean or 2) nonindicated cesarean. RESULTS: Six percent of women reported doula care during childbirth. Characteristics associated with desiring but not having doula support were black race (vs white; adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.77; 95% CI,1.03-3.03), and publicly insured or uninsured (vs privately insured; AOR = 1.83, CI, 1.17-2.85; AOR = 2.01, CI, 1.07-3.77, respectively). Doula-supported women had lower odds of cesarean compared without doula support and those who desired but did not have doula support (AOR = 0.41, CI, 0.18-0.96; and AOR = 0.31, CI, 0.13-0.74). The odds of nonindicated cesarean were 80-90% lower among doula-supported women (AOR= 0.17, CI, 0.07-0.39; and AOR= 0.11, CI, 0.03-0.36). CONCLUSIONS:Women with doula support have lower odds of nonindicated cesareans than those who did not have a doula as well as those who desired but did not have doula support. Increasing awareness of doula care and access to support from a doula may facilitate decreases in nonindicated cesarean rates.
Authors: Imran O Morhason-Bello; Babatunde O Adedokun; Oladosu A Ojengbede; Oladapo Olayemi; Adesina Oladokun; Adetokunbo O Fabamwo Journal: Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 2.100
Authors: Laurie A Nommsen-Rivers; Ann M Mastergeorge; Robin L Hansen; Arlene S Cullum; Kathryn G Dewey Journal: J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs Date: 2009 Mar-Apr
Authors: Renee Mehra; Shayna D Cunningham; Jessica B Lewis; Jordan L Thomas; Jeannette R Ickovics Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Katy B Kozhimannil; Carrie A Vogelsang; Rachel R Hardeman; Shailendra Prasad Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2016 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Katy B Kozhimannil; Rachel R Hardeman; Fernando Alarid-Escudero; Carrie A Vogelsang; Cori Blauer-Peterson; Elizabeth A Howell Journal: Birth Date: 2016-01-14 Impact factor: 3.689
Authors: Eline L M van Manen; Martine Hollander; Esther Feijen-de Jong; Ank de Jonge; Corine Verhoeven; Janneke Gitsels Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-06-17 Impact factor: 3.240