Aaron M Orkin1, Morgan Lay1, Janet McLaughlin2, Michael Schwandt3, Donald Cole1. 1. Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. 2. Health Studies, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ont. 3. Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. ; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Approximately 40 000 migrant farm workers are employed annually in Canada through temporary foreign worker programs. Workers experiencing health conditions that prevent ongoing work are normally repatriated to their home country, which raises concerns about human rights and health equity. In this study, we present data on the reasons for medical repatriation of migrant farm workers in Ontario. METHODS: In this retrospective descriptive study, we examined medical repatriation data from Foreign Agricultural Resource Management Services, a non-profit corporation managing the contracts of more than 15 000 migrant farm workers in Ontario annually. We extracted repatriation and demographic data for workers from 2001-2011. Physician volunteers used a validated system to code the reported reasons for medical repatriation. We conducted descriptive analyses of the dominant reasons for repatriation and rates of repatriation. RESULTS: During 2001-2011, 787 repatriations occurred among 170 315 migrant farm workers arriving in Ontario (4.62 repatriations per 1000 workers). More than two-thirds of repatriated workers were aged 30-49 years. Migrant farm workers were most frequently repatriated for medical or surgical reasons (41.3%) and external injuries including poisoning (25.5%). INTERPRETATION: This study provides quantitative health data related to a unique and vulnerable occupational group. Our findings reinforce existing knowledge regarding occupational hazards and health conditions among migrant farm workers. Medical repatriation of migrant farm workers merits further examination as a global health equity concern.
BACKGROUND: Approximately 40 000 migrant farm workers are employed annually in Canada through temporary foreign worker programs. Workers experiencing health conditions that prevent ongoing work are normally repatriated to their home country, which raises concerns about human rights and health equity. In this study, we present data on the reasons for medical repatriation of migrant farm workers in Ontario. METHODS: In this retrospective descriptive study, we examined medical repatriation data from Foreign Agricultural Resource Management Services, a non-profit corporation managing the contracts of more than 15 000 migrant farm workers in Ontario annually. We extracted repatriation and demographic data for workers from 2001-2011. Physician volunteers used a validated system to code the reported reasons for medical repatriation. We conducted descriptive analyses of the dominant reasons for repatriation and rates of repatriation. RESULTS: During 2001-2011, 787 repatriations occurred among 170 315 migrant farm workers arriving in Ontario (4.62 repatriations per 1000 workers). More than two-thirds of repatriated workers were aged 30-49 years. Migrant farm workers were most frequently repatriated for medical or surgical reasons (41.3%) and external injuries including poisoning (25.5%). INTERPRETATION: This study provides quantitative health data related to a unique and vulnerable occupational group. Our findings reinforce existing knowledge regarding occupational hazards and health conditions among migrant farm workers. Medical repatriation of migrant farm workers merits further examination as a global health equity concern.
Authors: Cheryl J Gustafson; Steven R Feldman; Sara A Quandt; Scott Isom; Haiying Chen; Chaya R Spears; Thomas A Arcury Journal: Int J Dermatol Date: 2013-05-15 Impact factor: 2.736
Authors: Sara A Quandt; Bradley T Jones; Jennifer W Talton; Lara E Whalley; Leonardo Galván; Quirina M Vallejos; Joseph G Grzywacz; Haiying Chen; Kathryn E Pharr; Scott Isom; Thomas A Arcury Journal: Environ Res Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Giulia Earle-Richardson; Paul L Jenkins; D Tucker Slingerland; Christine Mason; Melissa Miles; John J May Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Leah F Vosko; Tanya Basok; Cynthia Spring; Guillermo Candiz; Glynis George Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-07-14 Impact factor: 4.614