| Literature DB >> 25295092 |
Zhao-Hua Gao1, Chong Lu2, Mei-Xian Wang3, Yi Han4, Li-Juan Guo4.
Abstract
β-catenin, an epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-associated marker, is key in the progression of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the prognostic significance of β-catenin expression in patients with CRC remains controversial. In the present study, the expression of β-catenin at the tumor invasive front and the tumor center was investigated, and the correlations amongst β-catenin differential expression patterns and the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of CRC patients were determined. In total, 181 patients that were diagnosed with CRC (as determined by histopathological evaluation) and subjected to surgical resection at the First Hospital of China Medical University between 2000 and 2001 were examined, and CRC specimens were obtained. Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of β-catenin was performed for each specimen. The nuclear β-catenin expression levels were identified to be significantly lower in the tumor center than at the tumor invasive front (immunoreactivity score, 0.05±0.303 versus 2.18±3.917; P<0.001). The presence of nuclear β-catenin overexpression at the tumor invasive front was found to be correlated with the tumor, node, metastasis stage (P=0.020), lymph node metastasis (P=0.016) and histological differentiation (P=0.006). Survival analysis revealed that reduced membranous expression levels and increased nuclear expression levels of β-catenin were statistically significantly associated with poor survival times. Furthermore, differential β-catenin expression levels were associated with aggressive morphological features, EMT and a poor prognosis in CRC. Therefore, IHC analysis of β-catenin is considered to be a useful marker to predict the prognosis in patients with CRC.Entities:
Keywords: colorectal cancer; epithelial-mesenchymal transition; invasive front; tumor budding; β-catenin
Year: 2014 PMID: 25295092 PMCID: PMC4186582 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2014.2433
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncol Lett ISSN: 1792-1074 Impact factor: 2.967
Figure 1Immunohistochemical staining of β-catenin in colorectal cancer samples. (A) β-catenin membranous expression. (B) β-catenin cytoplasmic expression. (C) β-catenin nuclear expression.
Figure 2Immunohistochemical staining demonstrating differential β-catenin expression levels at the tumor center and at the tumor invasive front. (A) Overview picture demonstrating both the tumor center and the tumor invasive front. The red arrows indicate tumor budding and nuclear β-catenin expression. (magnification, ×200). (B) At the tumor center, β-catenin expression was predominant at the cell membrane. (C) At the tumor invasive front, the red arrows indicate that the isolated single tumor cells or the small clusters of tumor cells (tumor budding) had scattered from the primary mass with marked nuclear β-catenin accumulation (epithelial-mesenchymal transition phenotype; magnification, ×400).
Paired sample comparison (t-test) of β-catenin expression levels between the tumor center and tumor invasive front.
| Immunoreactivity score | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Variable | No. | Mean ± SD | P-value |
| Membranous β-catenin | |||
| Tumor center | 181 | 5.36±3.812 | <0.001 |
| Tumor front | 181 | 0.42±1.252 | |
| Nuclear β-catenin | |||
| Tumor center | 181 | 0.05±0.303 | <0.001 |
| Tumor front | 181 | 2.18±3.917 | |
P<0.05 indicates a significant difference. SD, standard deviation.
β-catenin expression levels at the tumor center in association with patient clinicopathological variables.
| Membranous expresssion levels | Cytoplasmic expression levels | Nuclear expression levels | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| Variable | Total | Preserved | Reduced | P-value | Low | High | P-value | Low | High | P-value |
| Age (years) | ||||||||||
| ≤60 | 65 | 21 | 44 | 0.079 | 47 | 18 | 0.248 | 62 | 3 | 0.255 |
| >60 | 116 | 53 | 63 | 92 | 24 | 114 | 2 | |||
| Gender | ||||||||||
| Male | 105 | 43 | 62 | 0.982 | 82 | 23 | 0.626 | 103 | 2 | 0.408 |
| Female | 76 | 31 | 45 | 57 | 19 | 73 | 3 | |||
| Tumor size (cm) | ||||||||||
| ≤5 | 94 | 40 | 54 | 0.635 | 71 | 23 | 0.675 | 91 | 3 | 0.714 |
| >5 | 87 | 34 | 53 | 68 | 19 | 85 | 2 | |||
| Tumor site | ||||||||||
| Colon | 72 | 27 | 45 | 0.425 | 59 | 13 | 0.182 | 69 | 3 | 0.349 |
| Rectum | 109 | 47 | 62 | 80 | 29 | 107 | 2 | |||
| T stage | ||||||||||
| pT1–pT2 | 61 | 30 | 31 | 0.106 | 52 | 9 | 0.055 | 60 | 1 | 0.511 |
| pT3–pT4 | 120 | 44 | 76 | 87 | 33 | 116 | 4 | |||
| N stage | ||||||||||
| pN0 | 108 | 54 | 54 | 0.002 | 88 | 20 | 0.069 | 104 | 4 | 0.347 |
| pN1–pN2 | 73 | 20 | 53 | 51 | 22 | 72 | 1 | |||
| TNM stage | ||||||||||
| I–II | 107 | 54 | 53 | 0.002 | 87 | 20 | 0.084 | 103 | 4 | 0.335 |
| III–IV | 74 | 20 | 54 | 52 | 22 | 73 | 1 | |||
| Tumor deposit | ||||||||||
| Absent | 152 | 65 | 87 | 0.239 | 117 | 35 | 0.897 | 147 | 5 | 0.322 |
| Present | 29 | 9 | 20 | 22 | 7 | 29 | 0 | |||
| Differentiation | ||||||||||
| Well, mod | 132 | 57 | 75 | 0.302 | 98 | 34 | 0.182 | 127 | 5 | 0.167 |
| Por, muc | 49 | 17 | 32 | 41 | 8 | 49 | 0 | |||
| Lymph invasion | ||||||||||
| Negative | 167 | 70 | 97 | 0.329 | 128 | 39 | 0.870 | 162 | 5 | 0.511 |
| Positive | 14 | 4 | 10 | 11 | 3 | 14 | 0 | |||
| Venous invasion | ||||||||||
| Negative | 178 | 73 | 105 | 0.789 | 136 | 42 | 0.337 | 173 | 5 | 0.768 |
| Positive | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | |||
Statistically significant (P<0.05).
TNM, tumor, node, metastasis; Mod, moderately differentiated; muc, mucinous adenocarcinoma; por, poorly differentiated and undifferentiated.
β-catenin expression levels at the tumor invasive front in association with patient clinicopathological variables.
| Membranous expression levels | Cytoplasmic expression levels | Nuclear expression levels | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| Variable | Total | Reduced | Preserved | P-value | Low | High | P-value | Low | High | P-value |
| Age (years) | ||||||||||
| ≤60 | 65 | 52 | 13 | 0.151 | 37 | 28 | 0.080 | 57 | 8 | 0.248 |
| >60 | 116 | 102 | 14 | 81 | 35 | 94 | 22 | |||
| Gender | ||||||||||
| Male | 105 | 91 | 14 | 0.482 | 66 | 39 | 0.438 | 90 | 15 | 0.330 |
| Female | 76 | 63 | 13 | 52 | 24 | 61 | 15 | |||
| Tumor size (cm) | ||||||||||
| ≤5 | 94 | 83 | 11 | 0.207 | 60 | 34 | 0.689 | 76 | 18 | 0.333 |
| >5 | 87 | 71 | 16 | 58 | 29 | 75 | 12 | |||
| Tumor site | ||||||||||
| Colon | 72 | 58 | 14 | 0.165 | 56 | 16 | 0.004 | 62 | 10 | 0.430 |
| Rectum | 109 | 96 | 13 | 62 | 47 | 89 | 20 | |||
| T stage | ||||||||||
| pT1–pT2 | 61 | 54 | 7 | 0.354 | 40 | 21 | 0.939 | 54 | 7 | 0.188 |
| pT3–pT4 | 120 | 100 | 20 | 78 | 42 | 97 | 23 | |||
| N stage | ||||||||||
| pN0 | 108 | 91 | 17 | 0.705 | 73 | 35 | 0.410 | 96 | 12 | 0.016 |
| pN1–pN2 | 73 | 63 | 10 | 45 | 28 | 55 | 18 | |||
| TNM stage | ||||||||||
| I–II | 107 | 90 | 17 | 0.659 | 72 | 35 | 0.476 | 95 | 12 | 0.020 |
| III–IV | 74 | 64 | 10 | 46 | 28 | 56 | 18 | |||
| Tumor deposit | ||||||||||
| Absent | 152 | 130 | 22 | 0.701 | 99 | 53 | 0.968 | 129 | 23 | 0.232 |
| Present | 29 | 24 | 5 | 19 | 10 | 22 | 7 | |||
| Differentiation | ||||||||||
| Well, mod | 132 | 109 | 23 | 0.120 | 77 | 55 | 0.001 | 104 | 28 | 0.006 |
| Por, muc | 49 | 45 | 4 | 41 | 8 | 47 | 2 | |||
| Lymph invasion | ||||||||||
| Negative | 167 | 143 | 24 | 0.476 | 110 | 57 | 0.510 | 139 | 28 | 0.811 |
| Positive | 14 | 11 | 3 | 8 | 6 | 12 | 2 | |||
| Venous invasion | ||||||||||
| Negative | 178 | 151 | 27 | 0.465 | 116 | 62 | 0.957 | 148 | 30 | 0.436 |
| Positive | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | |||
Statistically significant (P<0.05).
TNM, tumor, node, metastasis; Mod, moderately differentiated; muc, mucinous adenocarcinoma; por, poorly differentiated and undifferentiated.
Figure 3Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. (A) β-catenin membranous expression at the tumor center; preserved membranous expression vs. reduced membranous expression (P=0.028). (B) β-catenin nuclear expression at the tumor invasive front; low vs. high expression levels (P=0.020).
Univariate and multivariate analyses of survival rates in colorectal cancer patients.
| Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||
| Variable | Patients (n) | Five-year survival rate (%) | P-value | HR | 95% CI | P-value |
| Age (years) | ||||||
| ≤60 | 65 | 69.7 | 0.254 | |||
| >60 | 116 | 66.0 | ||||
| Gender | ||||||
| Male | 105 | 69.9 | 0.151 | |||
| Female | 76 | 64.0 | ||||
| Tumor size (cm) | ||||||
| ≤5 | 94 | 64.2 | 0.814 | |||
| >5 | 87 | 70.6 | ||||
| Tumor site | ||||||
| Colon | 72 | 65.2 | 0.266 | |||
| Rectum | 109 | 68.3 | ||||
| T stage | ||||||
| pT1–pT2 | 61 | 85.7 | <0.001 | |||
| pT3–pT4 | 120 | 58.5 | ||||
| N stage | ||||||
| pN0 | 108 | 92.5 | <0.001 | 10.729 | 1.336–86.14 | 0.026 |
| pN1–pN2 | 73 | 32.3 | ||||
| TNM stage | ||||||
| I–II | 107 | 93.4 | <0.001 | 0.009 | 0.001–0.082 | <0.001 |
| III–IV | 74 | 31.8 | ||||
| Tumor deposit | ||||||
| Absent | 152 | 76.8 | <0.001 | 0.368 | 0.208–0.651 | 0.001 |
| Present | 29 | 17.2 | ||||
| Differentiation | ||||||
| Well, mod | 132 | 68.7 | 0.984 | |||
| Por, muc | 49 | 62.8 | ||||
| Lymph invasion | ||||||
| Negative | 167 | 70.1 | <0.001 | |||
| Positive | 14 | 35.7 | ||||
| Venous invasion | ||||||
| Negative | 178 | 67.9 | 0.086 | |||
| Positive | 3 | 33.3 | ||||
| Tumor center membranous β-catenin | ||||||
| Preserved | 74 | 78.1 | 0.028 | 1.132 | 0.627–2.046 | 0.681 |
| Reduced | 107 | 58.5 | ||||
| Tumor front nuclear β-catenin | ||||||
| Low-grade | 151 | 70.1 | 0.020 | 0.708 | 0.384–1.705 | 0.268 |
| High-grade | 30 | 52.6 | ||||
Statistically significant (P<0.05). The forward stepwise Cox regression approach was performed for the statistical analyses and the non-significant variables are not presented in the final table.
CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; TNM, tumor, node, metastasis; mod, moderately differentiated; muc, mucinous adenocarcinoma; por, poorly differentiated and undifferentiated.