Literature DB >> 25294886

Prognostic value of KRAS mutations in stage III colon cancer: post hoc analysis of the PETACC8 phase III trial dataset.

H Blons1, J F Emile2, K Le Malicot3, C Julié4, A Zaanan5, J Tabernero6, E Mini7, G Folprecht8, J L Van Laethem9, J Thaler10, J Bridgewater11, L Nørgård-Petersen12, E Van Cutsem13, C Lepage14, M A Zawadi15, R Salazar16, P Laurent-Puig1, J Taieb17.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of KRAS mutations in colon adenocarcinoma is controversial. We examined this question as an ancillary study of the PETACC8 phase III trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed the prognostic impact of KRAS exon 2 mutations in stage III colon cancer patients (n = 1657) receiving adjuvant FOLFOX ± cetuximab therapy included in the PETACC8 trial. Patients with BRAF-mutated cancers were excluded and, as no difference was found for time to recurrence (TTR) and disease-free survival (DFS) between treatment arms, both were pooled for analysis. Associations with TTR and DFS were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model.
RESULTS: KRAS mutations were found in 638 of 1657 tumors and linked to shorter TTR (P < 0.001). However, when specific mutations were compared with wild-type, codon 12 mutations [hazard ratio (HR) 1.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.35-2.04; P < 0.001] but not codon 13 (HR 1.23, 95% CI 0.85-1.79; P = 0.26) were significantly associated with shorter TTR, independently of other covariates. The interaction test showed that, regarding tumor location (distal versus proximal), KRAS genotype affects differently on recurrence (P = 0.02) and DFS (P = 0.042). Subgroup analysis showed that KRAS only affected TTR and DFS in distal tumors (n = 1043; 692 wild type; 351 mutated), with an increased risk of relapse (HR 1.96, 95% CI 1.51-2.56; P < 0.0001) for KRAS codon 12 mutations and a borderline significance for codon 13 mutations (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.00-2.56; P = 0.051).
CONCLUSION: KRAS exon 2 mutations are independent predictors of shorter TTR in patients with resected stage III distal colon cancers receiving adjuvant therapy. Future clinical trials in the adjuvant setting should consider both the tumor location and KRAS mutations as important stratification factors. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: This is an ancillary study of the PETACC8 trial: EUDRACT 2005-003463-23.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  KRAS mutation; cetuximab; colorectal cancer; distal colon; prognosis; proximal colon

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25294886     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu464

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  42 in total

1.  Prognostic Value of BRAF and KRAS Mutations in MSI and MSS Stage III Colon Cancer.

Authors:  Julien Taieb; Karine Le Malicot; Qian Shi; Frédérique Penault-Llorca; Olivier Bouché; Josep Tabernero; Enrico Mini; Richard M Goldberg; Gunnar Folprecht; Jean Luc Van Laethem; Daniel J Sargent; Steven R Alberts; Jean Francois Emile; Pierre Laurent Puig; Frank A Sinicrope
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2016-12-31       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  KRAS Alleles: The Devil Is in the Detail.

Authors:  Kevin M Haigis
Journal:  Trends Cancer       Date:  2017-09-12

3.  Analysis of Molecular Markers by Anatomic Tumor Site in Stage III Colon Carcinomas from Adjuvant Chemotherapy Trial NCCTG N0147 (Alliance).

Authors:  Frank A Sinicrope; Michelle R Mahoney; Harry H Yoon; Thomas C Smyrk; Stephen N Thibodeau; Richard M Goldberg; Garth D Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; Steven R Alberts
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 4.  What We Know About Stage II and III Colon Cancer: It's Still Not Enough.

Authors:  Alberto Puccini; Martin D Berger; Wu Zhang; Heinz-Josef Lenz
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.493

Review 5.  From tumour heterogeneity to advances in precision treatment of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Cornelis J A Punt; Miriam Koopman; Louis Vermeulen
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 66.675

6.  Consensus Molecular Subtypes of Colorectal Cancer and their Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Ketan Thanki; Michael E Nicholls; Aakash Gajjar; Anthony J Senagore; Suimin Qiu; Csaba Szabo; Mark R Hellmich; Celia Chao
Journal:  Int Biol Biomed J       Date:  2017-06-13

Review 7.  Molecular Biomarkers in the Personalized Treatment of Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Frank A Sinicrope; Koichi Okamoto; Pashtoon M Kasi; Hisato Kawakami
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 8.  RAS signaling and anti-RAS therapy: lessons learned from genetically engineered mouse models, human cancer cells, and patient-related studies.

Authors:  Bingliang Fang
Journal:  Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai)       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 3.848

9.  Cetuximab treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer with KRAS p.G13D mutations improves progression-free survival.

Authors:  Hiroki Osumi; Eiji Shinozaki; Masahiko Osako; Yoshimasa Kawazoe; Masaru Oba; Takaharu Misaka; Takashi Goto; Hitomi Kamo; Mitsukuni Suenaga; Yosuke Kumekawa; Mariko Ogura; Masato Ozaka; Satoshi Matsusaka; Keisho Chin; Kiyohiko Hatake; Nobuyuki Mizunuma
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-07-09

Review 10.  Different treatment strategies and molecular features between right-sided and left-sided colon cancers.

Authors:  Hong Shen; Jiao Yang; Qing Huang; Meng-Jie Jiang; Yi-Nuo Tan; Jian-Fei Fu; Li-Zhen Zhu; Xue-Feng Fang; Ying Yuan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-06-07       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.