Literature DB >> 25294828

Explicit DNase sequence bias modeling enables high-resolution transcription factor footprint detection.

Galip Gürkan Yardımcı1, Christopher L Frank2, Gregory E Crawford3, Uwe Ohler4.   

Abstract

DNaseI footprinting is an established assay for identifying transcription factor (TF)-DNA interactions with single base pair resolution. High-throughput DNase-seq assays have recently been used to detect in vivo DNase footprints across the genome. Multiple computational approaches have been developed to identify DNase-seq footprints as predictors of TF binding. However, recent studies have pointed to a substantial cleavage bias of DNase and its negative impact on predictive performance of footprinting. To assess the potential for using DNase-seq to identify individual binding sites, we performed DNase-seq on deproteinized genomic DNA and determined sequence cleavage bias. This allowed us to build bias corrected and TF-specific footprint models. The predictive performance of these models demonstrated that predicted footprints corresponded to high-confidence TF-DNA interactions. DNase-seq footprints were absent under a fraction of ChIP-seq peaks, which we show to be indicative of weaker binding, indirect TF-DNA interactions or possible ChIP artifacts. The modeling approach was also able to detect variation in the consensus motifs that TFs bind to. Finally, cell type specific footprints were detected within DNase hypersensitive sites that are present in multiple cell types, further supporting that footprints can identify changes in TF binding that are not detectable using other strategies.
© The Author(s) 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25294828      PMCID: PMC4231734          DOI: 10.1093/nar/gku810

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  52 in total

1.  Highly expressed loci are vulnerable to misleading ChIP localization of multiple unrelated proteins.

Authors:  Leonid Teytelman; Deborah M Thurtle; Jasper Rine; Alexander van Oudenaarden
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Distinguishing direct versus indirect transcription factor-DNA interactions.

Authors:  Raluca Gordân; Alexander J Hartemink; Martha L Bulyk
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Systematic localization of common disease-associated variation in regulatory DNA.

Authors:  Matthew T Maurano; Richard Humbert; Eric Rynes; Robert E Thurman; Eric Haugen; Hao Wang; Alex P Reynolds; Richard Sandstrom; Hongzhu Qu; Jennifer Brody; Anthony Shafer; Fidencio Neri; Kristen Lee; Tanya Kutyavin; Sandra Stehling-Sun; Audra K Johnson; Theresa K Canfield; Erika Giste; Morgan Diegel; Daniel Bates; R Scott Hansen; Shane Neph; Peter J Sabo; Shelly Heimfeld; Antony Raubitschek; Steven Ziegler; Chris Cotsapas; Nona Sotoodehnia; Ian Glass; Shamil R Sunyaev; Rajinder Kaul; John A Stamatoyannopoulos
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  B-lineage transcription factors and cooperating gene lesions required for leukemia development.

Authors:  E Tijchon; J Havinga; F N van Leeuwen; B Scheijen
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 11.528

5.  Probing DNA shape and methylation state on a genomic scale with DNase I.

Authors:  Allan Lazarovici; Tianyin Zhou; Anthony Shafer; Ana Carolina Dantas Machado; Todd R Riley; Richard Sandstrom; Peter J Sabo; Yan Lu; Remo Rohs; John A Stamatoyannopoulos; Harmen J Bussemaker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  DNase I-hypersensitive exons colocalize with promoters and distal regulatory elements.

Authors:  Tim R Mercer; Stacey L Edwards; Michael B Clark; Shane J Neph; Hao Wang; Andrew B Stergachis; Sam John; Richard Sandstrom; Guoliang Li; Kuljeet S Sandhu; Yijun Ruan; Lars K Nielsen; John S Mattick; John A Stamatoyannopoulos
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2013-06-23       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Extensive variation in chromatin states across humans.

Authors:  Maya Kasowski; Sofia Kyriazopoulou-Panagiotopoulou; Fabian Grubert; Judith B Zaugg; Anshul Kundaje; Yuling Liu; Alan P Boyle; Qiangfeng Cliff Zhang; Fouad Zakharia; Damek V Spacek; Jingjing Li; Dan Xie; Anthony Olarerin-George; Lars M Steinmetz; John B Hogenesch; Manolis Kellis; Serafim Batzoglou; Michael Snyder
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Patterns of regulatory activity across diverse human cell types predict tissue identity, transcription factor binding, and long-range interactions.

Authors:  Nathan C Sheffield; Robert E Thurman; Lingyun Song; Alexias Safi; John A Stamatoyannopoulos; Boris Lenhard; Gregory E Crawford; Terrence S Furey
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Chromatin accessibility data sets show bias due to sequence specificity of the DNase I enzyme.

Authors:  Hashem Koohy; Thomas A Down; Tim J Hubbard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Transcriptome and genome sequencing uncovers functional variation in humans.

Authors:  Tuuli Lappalainen; Michael Sammeth; Marc R Friedländer; Peter A C 't Hoen; Jean Monlong; Manuel A Rivas; Mar Gonzàlez-Porta; Natalja Kurbatova; Thasso Griebel; Pedro G Ferreira; Matthias Barann; Thomas Wieland; Liliana Greger; Maarten van Iterson; Jonas Almlöf; Paolo Ribeca; Irina Pulyakhina; Daniela Esser; Thomas Giger; Andrew Tikhonov; Marc Sultan; Gabrielle Bertier; Daniel G MacArthur; Monkol Lek; Esther Lizano; Henk P J Buermans; Ismael Padioleau; Thomas Schwarzmayr; Olof Karlberg; Halit Ongen; Helena Kilpinen; Sergi Beltran; Marta Gut; Katja Kahlem; Vyacheslav Amstislavskiy; Oliver Stegle; Matti Pirinen; Stephen B Montgomery; Peter Donnelly; Mark I McCarthy; Paul Flicek; Tim M Strom; Hans Lehrach; Stefan Schreiber; Ralf Sudbrak; Angel Carracedo; Stylianos E Antonarakis; Robert Häsler; Ann-Christine Syvänen; Gert-Jan van Ommen; Alvis Brazma; Thomas Meitinger; Philip Rosenstiel; Roderic Guigó; Ivo G Gut; Xavier Estivill; Emmanouil T Dermitzakis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-09-15       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  29 in total

1.  Genome-wide footprinting: ready for prime time?

Authors:  Myong-Hee Sung; Songjoon Baek; Gordon L Hager
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 28.547

2.  Genome-Wide Transcription Factor Binding in Leaves from C3 and C4 Grasses.

Authors:  Steven J Burgess; Ivan Reyna-Llorens; Sean R Stevenson; Pallavi Singh; Katja Jaeger; Julian M Hibberd
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 3.  Protein-DNA binding in high-resolution.

Authors:  Shaun Mahony; B Franklin Pugh
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 8.250

Review 4.  Next generation sequencing technology and genomewide data analysis: Perspectives for retinal research.

Authors:  Vijender Chaitankar; Gökhan Karakülah; Rinki Ratnapriya; Felipe O Giuste; Matthew J Brooks; Anand Swaroop
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2016-06-11       Impact factor: 21.198

5.  Analysis of computational footprinting methods for DNase sequencing experiments.

Authors:  Eduardo G Gusmao; Manuel Allhoff; Martin Zenke; Ivan G Costa
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 6.  Genomic footprinting.

Authors:  Jeff Vierstra; John A Stamatoyannopoulos
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 28.547

7.  Discovery and validation of information theory-based transcription factor and cofactor binding site motifs.

Authors:  Ruipeng Lu; Eliseos J Mucaki; Peter K Rogan
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Combining transcription factor binding affinities with open-chromatin data for accurate gene expression prediction.

Authors:  Florian Schmidt; Nina Gasparoni; Gilles Gasparoni; Kathrin Gianmoena; Cristina Cadenas; Julia K Polansky; Peter Ebert; Karl Nordström; Matthias Barann; Anupam Sinha; Sebastian Fröhler; Jieyi Xiong; Azim Dehghani Amirabad; Fatemeh Behjati Ardakani; Barbara Hutter; Gideon Zipprich; Bärbel Felder; Jürgen Eils; Benedikt Brors; Wei Chen; Jan G Hengstler; Alf Hamann; Thomas Lengauer; Philip Rosenstiel; Jörn Walter; Marcel H Schulz
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Universal correction of enzymatic sequence bias reveals molecular signatures of protein/DNA interactions.

Authors:  André L Martins; Ninad M Walavalkar; Warren D Anderson; Chongzhi Zang; Michael J Guertin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Bivariate Genomic Footprinting Detects Changes in Transcription Factor Activity.

Authors:  Songjoon Baek; Ido Goldstein; Gordon L Hager
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 9.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.