Literature DB >> 25294727

Does the economy affect functional restoration outcomes for patients with chronic disabling occupational musculoskeletal disorders?

Meredith M Hartzell1, Tom G Mayer, Randy Neblett, Dennis J Marquardt, Robert J Gatchel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine how the economy affects psychosocial and socioeconomic treatment outcomes in a cohort of chronic disabling occupational musculoskeletal disorder (CDOMD) patients who completed a functional restoration program (FRP).
METHODS: A cohort of 969 CDOMD patients with active workers' compensation claims completed an FRP (a medically-supervised, quantitatively-directed exercise progression program, with multi-modal disability management). A good economy (GE) group (n = 532) was released to work during a low unemployment period (2005-2007), and a poor economy (PE) group (n = 437) was released during a higher unemployment period (2008-2010). Patients were evaluated upon admission for demographic and psychosocial variables, and were reassessed at discharge. Socioeconomic outcomes, including work return and work retention 1 year post-discharge, were collected.
RESULTS: Some significant differences in psychosocial self-report data were found, but most of the effect sizes were small, so caution should be made when interpreting the data. Compared to the PE group, the GE group reported more depressive symptoms and disability at admission, but demonstrated a larger decrease in depressive symptoms and disability and increase in self-reported quality of life at discharge. The PE group had lower rates of work return and retention 1-year after discharge, even after controlling for other factors such as length of disability and admission work status.
CONCLUSIONS: CDOMD patients who completed an FRP in a PE year were less likely to return to, or retain, work 1-year after discharge, demonstrating that a PE can be an additional barrier to post-discharge work outcomes. A difference in State unemployment rates of <3% (7 vs. 5%) had a disproportionate effect on patients' failure to return to (19 vs. 6%) or retain (28 vs. 15%) work.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25294727     DOI: 10.1007/s10926-014-9546-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  34 in total

1.  Effects of age, gender, and socio-economic status on the incidence of spinal cord injury: an assessment using the eleven-year comprehensive nationwide database of Taiwan.

Authors:  Jau-Ching Wu; Yu-Chun Chen; Laura Liu; Tzeng-Ji Chen; Wen-Cheng Huang; Henrich Cheng; Tung-Ping Su
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 5.269

2.  The pain disability questionnaire: relationship to one-year functional and psychosocial rehabilitation outcomes.

Authors:  Robert J Gatchel; Tom G Mayer; Brian R Theodore
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2006-03

3.  Exploring incentives for RNs to return to practice: a partial solution to the nursing shortage.

Authors:  Joanne C Langan; Rita A Tadych; Chia-Chan Kao
Journal:  J Prof Nurs       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.104

4.  Disability pensions due to spinal disorders: nationwide Finnish register-based study, 1990-2010.

Authors:  Tom Asklöf; Hannu Kautiainen; Salme Järvenpää; Maija Haanpää; Ilkka Kiviranta; Timo Pohjolainen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Prognostic factors for return to work after a first compensated episode of back pain.

Authors:  C Infante-Rivard; M Lortie
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.402

6.  Work status as a predictor of surgical outcome of discogenic low back pain.

Authors:  Paul A Anderson; Paul E Schwaegler; Deborah Cizek; Glen Leverson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Symptoms of depression and stress mediate the effect of pain on disability.

Authors:  Amanda M Hall; Steven J Kamper; Chris G Maher; Jane Latimer; Manuela L Ferreira; Michael K Nicholas
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 6.961

8.  Work retention and nonspecific low back pain.

Authors:  Marco A Campello; Sherri R Weiser; Margareta Nordin; Rudi Hiebert
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  The pain disability questionnaire: a new psychometrically sound measure for chronic musculoskeletal disorders.

Authors:  Christopher Anagnostis; Robert J Gatchel; Tom G Mayer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Relationships of clinical, psychologic, and individual factors with the functional status of neck pain patients.

Authors:  Xuemei Luo; Christopher L Edwards; William Richardson; Lloyd Hey
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.