Literature DB >> 25294624

Response to Lilienfield.

Bruce N Cuthbert1.   

Abstract

The article by Lillienfeld in this issue comprises a thoughtful critique of the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) project initiated by the National Institute of Mental Health, and includes four specific theoretical and methodological challenges along with recommendations to address each one. In this commentary, I briefly consider each of the four challenges in turn, noting points of agreement and also clarifying selected points from the NIMH RDoC perspective. Overall, Lillienfeld's paper represents a valuable contribution to the RDoC literature as research conducted with the new framework continues to accelerate. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endophenotypes; Intermediate phenotypes; Psychopathology; RDoC; Research Domain Criteria

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25294624      PMCID: PMC5677190          DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2014.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Ther        ISSN: 0005-7967


  4 in total

Review 1.  Constructing constructs for psychopathology: the NIMH research domain criteria.

Authors:  Bruce N Cuthbert; Michael J Kozak
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2013-08

2.  Endophenotypes: bridging genomic complexity and disorder heterogeneity.

Authors:  Thomas R Insel; Bruce N Cuthbert
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 13.382

3.  The Research Domain Criteria (RDoC): an analysis of methodological and conceptual challenges.

Authors:  Scott O Lilienfeld
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2014-08-06

4.  Clinical, functional, and intertask correlations of measures developed by the Cognitive Neuroscience Test Reliability and Clinical Applications for Schizophrenia Consortium.

Authors:  James M Gold; Deanna M Barch; Cameron S Carter; Steven Dakin; Steven J Luck; Angus W MacDonald; J Daniel Ragland; Charan Ranganath; Ilona Kovacs; Steven M Silverstein; Milton Strauss
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 9.306

  4 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Clashing Diagnostic Approaches: DSM-ICD Versus RDoC.

Authors:  Scott O Lilienfeld; Michael T Treadway
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 18.561

2.  Psychometric properties of startle and corrugator response in NPU, affective picture viewing, and resting state tasks.

Authors:  Jesse T Kaye; Daniel E Bradford; John J Curtin
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Enhancing Psychosis-Spectrum Nosology Through an International Data Sharing Initiative.

Authors:  Anna R Docherty; Eduardo Fonseca-Pedrero; Martin Debbané; Raymond C K Chan; Richard J Linscott; Katherine G Jonas; David C Cicero; Melissa J Green; Leonard J Simms; Oliver Mason; David Watson; Ulrich Ettinger; Monika Waszczuk; Alexander Rapp; Phillip Grant; Roman Kotov; Colin G DeYoung; Camilo J Ruggero; Nicolas R Eaton; Robert F Krueger; Christopher Patrick; Christopher Hopwood; F Anthony O'Neill; David H Zald; Christopher C Conway; Daniel E Adkins; Irwin D Waldman; Jim van Os; Patrick F Sullivan; John S Anderson; Andrey A Shabalin; Scott R Sponheim; Stephan F Taylor; Rachel G Grazioplene; Silviu A Bacanu; Tim B Bigdeli; Corinna Haenschel; Dolores Malaspina; Diane C Gooding; Kristin Nicodemus; Frauke Schultze-Lutter; Neus Barrantes-Vidal; Christine Mohr; William T Carpenter; Alex S Cohen
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 9.306

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.