Oh Jeong1, Mi Ran Jung, Young Kyu Park, Seong Yeop Ryu. 1. Department of Surgery, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, 160, Ilsim-ri, Hwasun-eup, Hwasun-gun, Jeollanam-Do, South Korea, surgeonjeong@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Intracorporeal Billroth I (ICBI) (delta-shaped) anastomosis is being increasingly used for laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. However, few studies have focused on the safety and feasibility of adopting this new technique. The present study aimed to review the surgical outcomes after the initial experience of performing ICBI anastomosis and to evaluate whether this technique can be safely adopted without increasing operative risk during the early learning process. METHODS: Forty-two consecutive patients who underwent ICBI anastomosis with laparoscopic distal gastrectomy by a single surgeon were enrolled, and their operative outcomes and hospital course were compared with those of 179 patients who underwent conventional extracorporeal Billroth I (ECBI) anastomosis by the same operator. The learning curve was assessed by evaluating the moving average of anastomosis time. RESULTS: The operating time in the ICBI group was significantly longer than that in the ECBI group (142 vs. 116 min, p < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences in the postoperative hospital course such as gas passage, diet initiation, postoperative fever, and hospital stay between the two groups. Postoperative morbidity did not significantly differ between the ICBI and ECBI groups (7.1 vs. 12.3 %, p = 0.428). No anastomosis-related complications occurred in the ICBI group. The mean anastomosis time for ICBI anastomosis was 24 ± 5 min, and the anastomosis average time curve showed that it reached a plateau approximately after the 14th case. CONCLUSIONS: ICBI anastomosis has a steep learning curve without increasing operative risk in the early learning process, when performed by experienced laparoscopic surgeons. The technical feasibility and clinical advantages of intracorporeal anastomosis need to be proven in future clinical trials.
BACKGROUND: Intracorporeal Billroth I (ICBI) (delta-shaped) anastomosis is being increasingly used for laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. However, few studies have focused on the safety and feasibility of adopting this new technique. The present study aimed to review the surgical outcomes after the initial experience of performing ICBI anastomosis and to evaluate whether this technique can be safely adopted without increasing operative risk during the early learning process. METHODS: Forty-two consecutive patients who underwent ICBI anastomosis with laparoscopic distal gastrectomy by a single surgeon were enrolled, and their operative outcomes and hospital course were compared with those of 179 patients who underwent conventional extracorporeal Billroth I (ECBI) anastomosis by the same operator. The learning curve was assessed by evaluating the moving average of anastomosis time. RESULTS: The operating time in the ICBI group was significantly longer than that in the ECBI group (142 vs. 116 min, p < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences in the postoperative hospital course such as gas passage, diet initiation, postoperative fever, and hospital stay between the two groups. Postoperative morbidity did not significantly differ between the ICBI and ECBI groups (7.1 vs. 12.3 %, p = 0.428). No anastomosis-related complications occurred in the ICBI group. The mean anastomosis time for ICBI anastomosis was 24 ± 5 min, and the anastomosis average time curve showed that it reached a plateau approximately after the 14th case. CONCLUSIONS:ICBI anastomosis has a steep learning curve without increasing operative risk in the early learning process, when performed by experienced laparoscopic surgeons. The technical feasibility and clinical advantages of intracorporeal anastomosis need to be proven in future clinical trials.
Authors: Deok Gie Kim; Yoon Young Choi; Ji Yeong An; In Gyu Kwon; In Cho; Yoo Min Kim; Jung Min Bae; Myung Gyu Song; Sung Hoon Noh Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2013-03-14 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Young-Woo Kim; Yong Hae Baik; Young Ho Yun; Byung Ho Nam; Dae Hyun Kim; Il Ju Choi; Jae-Moon Bae Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Won Ho Han; Amir Ben Yehuda; Deok-Hee Kim; Seung Geun Yang; Bang Wool Eom; Hong Man Yoon; Young-Woo Kim; Keun Won Ryu Journal: Chin J Cancer Res Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 5.087
Authors: Piotr Małczak; Grzegorz Torbicz; Mateusz Rubinkiewicz; Natalia Gajewska; Nadia Sajuk; Kamil Rozmus; Michał Wysocki; Piotr Major; Andrzej Budzyński; Michał Pędziwiatr Journal: Cancer Manag Res Date: 2018-12-06 Impact factor: 3.989
Authors: You Na Kim; Ji Yeong An; Yoon Young Choi; Min-Gew Choi; Jun Ho Lee; Tae Sung Sohn; Jae Moon Bae; Sung Kim Journal: J Gastric Cancer Date: 2019-03-27 Impact factor: 3.720
Authors: Chang In Choi; Chang Min Lee; Ji Ho Park; Ye Seob Jee; Han Hong Lee; Oh Jeong; Sungsoo Park Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2019-10-03 Impact factor: 6.244