Literature DB >> 25294498

Postural adjustments to support surface perturbations during reaching depend upon body-target reference frame.

Alicia J Hilderley1, Julia A Leonard, Andrea Green, Ryan Ouckama, Paul J Stapley.   

Abstract

We investigated whether target position relative to the body modifies the postural adjustments produced when reaching movements are perturbed by unexpected displacements of the support surface. Eleven healthy participants reached to a target located at their midline, acromion height and at 130% their outstretched arm length. They stood on two force plates mounted on a moveable platform, capable of delivering horizontal forward ramp-and-hold perturbations. Three types of trial were given: reach only (R), perturbations only (P) and reaching movements during which a perturbation was given at a random delay after reach onset (RP). The target could be mounted either on a frame suspended from the ceiling such that it remained world-fixed (exocentric target, RP/X) or at an equivalent position on the moving platform so that it moved with the body (egocentric target, RP/E). Arm and body 3D kinematics and muscle activity from the right tibialis anterior (rTA) and soleus (rSOL) muscles were recorded. Normalised rTA activity was significantly lower in RP than in P trials. Furthermore, long-latency rTA muscle activity was lower in RP/E than in RP/X conditions when perturbations were given during either the arm deceleration phase of reaching. The rSOL muscle activity was lowest for the RP/E (arm deceleration) condition. When balance is perturbed during reaching, the manner in which the target moves relative to the body determines the muscle activity produced in the lower-limb muscles. Furthermore, a target that moves with the body requires a different regulation of muscle activity compared with one that moves independently of the body.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25294498     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-4113-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  42 in total

1.  Anticipatory postural adjustments in a bimanual, whole-body lifting task seem not only aimed at minimising anterior--posterior centre of mass displacements.

Authors:  D A Commissaris; H M Toussaint; H Hirschfeld
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.840

2.  The interplay between posture control and memory for spatial locations.

Authors:  Michael A Riley; Suvobrata Mitra; Nichole Saunders; Adam W Kiefer; Sebastian Wallot
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Is lower leg proprioception essential for triggering human automatic postural responses?

Authors:  B R Bloem; J H Allum; M G Carpenter; F Honegger
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Goal-directed reaching: movement strategies influence the weighting of allocentric and egocentric visual cues.

Authors:  Kristina A Neely; Ayla Tessmer; Gordon Binsted; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Is balance or posture at the end of a voluntary movement programmed?

Authors:  M C Do; P Nouillot; S Bouisset
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1991-09-02       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  The role of anticipatory postural adjustments during whole body forward reaching movements.

Authors:  P Stapley; T Pozzo; A Grishin
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1998-02-16       Impact factor: 1.837

7.  Postural adjustments associated with rapid voluntary arm movements 1. Electromyographic data.

Authors:  W G Friedli; M Hallett; S R Simon
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 10.154

8.  Triggering of balance corrections and compensatory strategies in a patient with total leg proprioceptive loss.

Authors:  B R Bloem; J H J Allum; M G Carpenter; J J G M Verschuuren; F Honegger
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-11-14       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Adapting reflexes controlling the human posture.

Authors:  L M Nashner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1976-08-27       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Keeping your balance while balancing a cylinder: interaction between postural and voluntary goals.

Authors:  Selma Papegaaij; Andrea C de Lima-Pardini; Beth A Smith; Egbert Otten; Rajal G Cohen; Fay B Horak
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.