Cynthia Y Y Chan1, Helen H L Tsang2, C S Lau2,3, H Y Chung2. 1. Department of Psychiatry, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong, China. 2. Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China. 3. Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of anxiety and depression in axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) patients by a psychiatrist using the Chinese-bilingual Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition patient research version (CB-SCID-I/P), and to examine the effectiveness of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) as a screening tool. METHODS: We recruited 160 Chinese axial-SpA patients to determine the prevalence of anxiety and depression using the CB-SCID-I/P. Recruited subjects were asked to complete the HADS. HADS, HADS-depression (HADS-D) subscale and HADS-anxiety (HADS-A) subscale were analyzed to determine their effectiveness in screening for depressive and anxiety disorders. RESULTS: The prevalence of current major depressive disorder (MDD) and anxiety disorder were 10.6% and 15.6%, respectively. The full-scale HADS outperformed the HADS-D subscale in screening for current MDD (area under the curve [AUC] 0.889; 0.844) and all depressive disorders (AUC 0.885; 0.862) while the HADS-A subscale outperformed the full scale HADS in screening for anxiety disorders (AUC 0.894; 0.846). The optimal cut-off point of the full scale HADS for screening current MDD and all depressive disorders were 7/8 and 6/7, yielding a sensitivity of 82.4% and 83.9%, specificity of 78.7% and 74.8%, respectively. The optimal cut-off point of HADS-A subscale for screening anxiety disorders was 6/7, yielding a sensitivity of 88.0% and specificity of 74.4%. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of MDD and anxiety disorder in SpA patients were 10.6% and 15.6%, respectively. We recommend using the full-scale HADS in screening for depressive disorders and HADS-A subscale for anxiety disorders.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of anxiety and depression in axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) patients by a psychiatrist using the Chinese-bilingual Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition patient research version (CB-SCID-I/P), and to examine the effectiveness of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) as a screening tool. METHODS: We recruited 160 Chinese axial-SpA patients to determine the prevalence of anxiety and depression using the CB-SCID-I/P. Recruited subjects were asked to complete the HADS. HADS, HADS-depression (HADS-D) subscale and HADS-anxiety (HADS-A) subscale were analyzed to determine their effectiveness in screening for depressive and anxiety disorders. RESULTS: The prevalence of current major depressive disorder (MDD) and anxiety disorder were 10.6% and 15.6%, respectively. The full-scale HADS outperformed the HADS-D subscale in screening for current MDD (area under the curve [AUC] 0.889; 0.844) and all depressive disorders (AUC 0.885; 0.862) while the HADS-A subscale outperformed the full scale HADS in screening for anxiety disorders (AUC 0.894; 0.846). The optimal cut-off point of the full scale HADS for screening current MDD and all depressive disorders were 7/8 and 6/7, yielding a sensitivity of 82.4% and 83.9%, specificity of 78.7% and 74.8%, respectively. The optimal cut-off point of HADS-A subscale for screening anxiety disorders was 6/7, yielding a sensitivity of 88.0% and specificity of 74.4%. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of MDD and anxiety disorder in SpA patients were 10.6% and 15.6%, respectively. We recommend using the full-scale HADS in screening for depressive disorders and HADS-A subscale for anxiety disorders.
Authors: Helen Hoi Lun Tsang; Jason Pui Yin Cheung; Carlos King Ho Wong; Prudence Wing Hang Cheung; Chak Sing Lau; Ho Yin Chung Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2021-05-14 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Chiu Wai Shirley Chan; Helen Hoi Lun Tsang; Philip Hei Li; Kam Ho Lee; Chak Sing Lau; Pui Yan Stella Wong; Ho Yin Chung Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-08-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Sizheng Zhao; Daniel Thong; Natasha Miller; Stephen J Duffield; David M Hughes; Laura Chadwick; Nicola J Goodson Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2018-07-11 Impact factor: 5.156
Authors: Helen Hoi Lun Tsang; Jason Pui Yin Cheung; Carlos King Ho Wong; Prudence Wing Hang Cheung; Chak Sing Lau; Ho Yin Chung Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2019-01-30 Impact factor: 5.156