| Literature DB >> 25292360 |
P F S Rosa1, C Adriano2, T M Garitezi2, T Grant3, Z Fisk3, R R Urbano2, P G Pagliuso2.
Abstract
The role of orbital differentiation on the emergence of superconductivity in the Fe-based superconductors remains an open question to the scientific community. In this investigation, we employ a suitable microscopic spin probe technique, namely Electron Spin Resonance (ESR), to investigate this issue on selected chemically substituted BaFe2As2 single crystals. As the spin-density wave (SDW) phase is suppressed, we observe a clear increase of the Fe 3d bands anisotropy along with their localization at the FeAs plane. Such an increase of the planar orbital content is interestingly independent of the chemical substitution responsible for suppressing the SDW phase. As a consequence, the magnetic fluctuations in combination with this particular symmetry of the Fe 3d bands are propitious ingredients for the emergence of superconductivity in this class of materials.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25292360 PMCID: PMC4189021 DOI: 10.1038/srep06543
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Thermodynamic properties of the Ba1−EuFe2−MAs2 single crystals.
The insets show a) the zero electrical resistivity at the superconducting transition and, b) zero-field cooling/field cooling magnetic susceptibilities.
Figure 2X-Band (~ 9.5 GHz) ESR spectra of Ba1−EuFe2−MAs2 single crystals at room temperature.
Figure 3T-dependence of a-b) the ESR linewidth ΔH and c) the g-values measured for Ba1−EuFe2−MAs2 compounds.
Experimental ESR Korringa rate b, the g-values, the g-shift Δg, the exchange interaction J(0) and calculated for all samples studied in this work. As defined in Eq. 2, Δg ≡ g − g. For Eu2+, g is well known to be 1.993(1)13. For Mn2+, an average of g value in similar insulating compounds leads to 2.00(5)13. For Cu2+, we assume that the magnetic moment is entirely due to the spin and the g ~ 2. Although this assumption leads to a significant error in J(0), it does not affect the Korringa-like analysis (Eq. 1)161718
| Sample | Δ | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ba0.8Eu0.2Fe2As2 (ref. compound) | 4.3(2) | 2.04(4) | 0.05(3) | 2(1) | 1.4(8) |
| BaFe1.9Cu0.1As2 | 3.5(2) | 2.08(4) | 0.08(3) | 2(1) | 1.2(6) |
| Ba0.78Eu0.22Fe1.91Cu0.09As2 | 2.8(2) | 2.05(4) | 0.06(4) | 2(1) | 1.1(8) |
| Ba0.8Eu0.2Fe1.89Ni0.11As2 | 2.5(2) | 2.04(4) | 0.05(3) | 2(1) | 1.0(8) |
| Ba0.8Eu0.2Fe1.88Co0.12As2 | 1.7(2) | 2.05(3) | 0.06(3) | 2(1) | 0.9(7) |
| Ba0.75Eu0.25Fe1.99Ru0.01As2 | 1.5(2) | 2.04(3) | 0.05(3) | 2(1) | 0.8(7) |
| BaFe1.88Mn0.12As2 | 1.1(2) | 2.04(3) | 0.05(3) | 2(1) | 0.7(6) |
Figure 4Spin-density wave transition temperature TSDW and Korringa rate b as a function of transition metal substitution M when the ESR spin probe is a) out of the Fe-As plane and, b) in the Fe-As plane.
Figure 5Squared overlap between the Eu 4f isotropic wavefunction and the t2 Fe 3d wavefunctions xy (B = 1.0) and xz/yz (B = 0.0) when a) the probe is at the Fe-As plane; b) the probe is out of the Fe-As plane.