Deep-ultraviolet surface-enhanced Raman scattering (UV-SERS) is a promising technique for bioimaging and detection because many biological molecules possess UV absorption lines leading to strongly resonant Raman scattering. Here, Al nanovoid substrates are developed by combining nanoimprint lithography of etched polymer/silica opal films with electron beam evaporation, to give a high-performance sensing platform for UV-SERS. Enhancement by more than 3 orders of magnitude in the UV-SERS performance was obtained from the DNA base adenine, matching well the UV plasmonic optical signatures and simulations, demonstrating its suitability for biodetection.
Deep-ultraviolet surface-enhanced Raman scattering (UV-SERS) is a promising technique for bioimaging and detection because many biological molecules possess UV absorption lines leading to strongly resonant Raman scattering. Here, Al nanovoid substrates are developed by combining nanoimprint lithography of etched polymer/silica opal films with electron beam evaporation, to give a high-performance sensing platform for UV-SERS. Enhancement by more than 3 orders of magnitude in the UV-SERS performance was obtained from the DNA base adenine, matching well the UV plasmonic optical signatures and simulations, demonstrating its suitability for biodetection.
Surface-enhanced Raman scattering is a powerful technique to probe
small traces of substances via the strong concentration of electric
fields on plasmonic substrates. Since its discovery in 1970,[1−3] this technique has improved greatly and various plasmonic sensing
platforms, ranging from colloidal nanocrystal aggregates[4] to nanostructured surfaces[5] have demonstrated its usability. To improve the sensitivity
further, the most common route is to increase the electromagnetic
field intensity in the plasmonic “hot spots”. However,
fundamental constraints exist as a result of quantum tunnelling,[6] besides the fabrication difficulties at this
nanoscale. Another strategy is to identify electronic transitions
in the analyte. Tuning the Raman excitation laser to an electronic
absorption line increases the Raman scattering cross-section dramatically
and leads to resonant Raman scattering, which can be amplified by
thousands of times over the nonresonant scattering.[7]Existing plasmonic substrates are, so far, mostly
limited to the visible spectral range as the typical materials, gold
and silver, absorb light at UV frequencies due to interband transitions.
However, numerous molecules in biology and chemistry have absorption
lines in the UV.[8,9] Despite no commercial availability,
a reliable sensing platform for this spectral range is highly desirable.
Moreover, because 266 nm solid-state sources are becoming widely available,
compact, and affordable, this will harness the growing interest in
UV SERS.Previous attempts for near UV-excitation (325 nm) used
rhodium (Rh) and ruthenium (Ru)[10] with
limited success, whereas attempts in the deep-UV (244 nm) are rare.
Palladium (Pd)[11−13] and aluminum (Al)[14−19] have effective plasmonic response in the UV. In particular, Al supports
strong plasmons across a broad spectrum ranging from the deep-UV (244
nm) to the NIR, making it a rather universal plasmonic material, as
recently demonstrated by Mogensen et al.[20] So far, it remains challenging to fabricate colloidal Al nanoparticles
(NPs).[21−24] Although Al NPs can be formed by annealing Al films, their size
distribution is very broad with irregular spacing.[25] Using interference lithography, well-defined Al NP patterns
can be generated on a developed substrate, which have been utilized
as UV SERS substrates.[18] However, such
methods are expensive and are not scalable. Recently, however, we
developed a nanovoid geometry that has been proved to be an excellent
SERS substrate due to its effective plasmonic confinement,[26,27] and have further shown that Al can be used in nanovoids to get strong
enhancement (up to 100-fold) of Raman signals in the UV.[16] The fabrication of the nanovoids is however
complicated and involves colloidal self-assembly and electrochemical
deposition methods. In this case the fabrication of well-ordered colloidal
monolayers is particularly challenging as the optimal spheres are
<200 nm diameter,[28] which requires proper
control of the assembly conditions at the air–water interface.[16,29,30] It has been difficult to assemble
spheres with sizes below 400 nm, as the capillary surface forces between
the particles are too weak compared to Brownian motion to form an
ordered monolayer at the air–water interface,[31,32] and many defects are generated.
Fabrication Procedure of Al Nanovoids
The preformed SiO2@PMMA@PEA opal films were ion-milled, followed by imprinting onto
PS films. Al was consequently evaporated on the surface to form Al
nanovoids.In this letter, we propose a facile
and cost-effective route, which is suitable for the large scale fabrication
of an Al sensing platform for UV-SERS. Large areas of Al nanovoids
were fabricated via nanoimprint lithography. Rather than using the
traditional self-assembled monolayer as a mask for colloidal lithography,
our method starts from the fabrication of the colloidal stamp from
polymer opal films (POFs) as shown in Scheme 1. We initially use silica core poly(methyl methacrylate-ethyl acrylate)
shell particles (SiO2@PMMA@PEA) to fabricate the POFs using
a custom-built roll-and-shear rig.[33] Because
of the soft and plastic polymeric shells, the hard silica cores rearrange
into highly ordered arrays with the assistance of shearing while the
polymer shells melt to form a PMMA/PEA matrix. Because the SiO2 sphere arrays are embedded inside this matrix, an additional
milling process applied to the POFs can etch away the surface polymer
layers to partially reveal the hard silica nanospheres. This highly
ordered array of silica spheres in the surface layer is then used
as a stamp for imprint lithography. The stamp is here imprinted onto
a thin 50 nm film of polystyrene (PS), which is spin-coated on a Si
wafer. A layer of 50 nm Al is evaporated onto the nanovoids via E-beam
evaporation (Lesker) to form the film of Al nanovoids, which are then
ready for further characterization and UV SERS measurement. The skin
depth of aluminum in the UV range is <10 nm, so film thicknesses
>10 nm support plasmonic activity without attenuation. Larger film
thicknesses do not change the plasmonic properties.
Scheme 1
Fabrication Procedure of Al Nanovoids
The preformed SiO2@PMMA@PEA opal films were ion-milled, followed by imprinting onto
PS films. Al was consequently evaporated on the surface to form Al
nanovoids.
Surface morphology characterization
of POFs (a–c) before and (d–f) after ion milling. (a)
SEM image of SiO2@PMMA@PEA POFs, scale bar is 1 μm;
and (b) the corresponding reflection spectra, inset is the optical
image of the POFs, scale bar is 100 μm. (c) AFM characterization
of the surface profile of the POFs with AFM image showing in the inset.
Scale bar is 2 μm. Right Inset is zoomed region of the surface
profile. (d, e) Top and tilted views (0°,30°) of the POFs
after 3 min ion milling. Scale bars are 200 nm. (f) Corresponding
AFM characterization as c after 3 min ion milling.When embedded in the POFs, the morphology of the
arrays of silica nanospheres can only be identified with difficulty
(Figure 1a). The POFs presents a blue structural
color (resonant at 480 nm) with maximum reflectivity of 35% (Figure 1b), which indicates very good ordering of the silica
spheres throughout the 3D array. The AFM image (inset of Figure 1c) shows very low contrast because the surface of
the POF remains covered with PMMA/PEA although ordered arrays can
still be recognized. The height profile of the POF at this stage is
very flat with a feature height of only 1–2 nm (right inset
of Figure 1c).
Figure 1
Surface morphology characterization
of POFs (a–c) before and (d–f) after ion milling. (a)
SEM image of SiO2@PMMA@PEA POFs, scale bar is 1 μm;
and (b) the corresponding reflection spectra, inset is the optical
image of the POFs, scale bar is 100 μm. (c) AFM characterization
of the surface profile of the POFs with AFM image showing in the inset.
Scale bar is 2 μm. Right Inset is zoomed region of the surface
profile. (d, e) Top and tilted views (0°,30°) of the POFs
after 3 min ion milling. Scale bars are 200 nm. (f) Corresponding
AFM characterization as c after 3 min ion milling.
There are several routes
to remove the polymer layers to reveal the surface profile of the
silica spheres. Oxygen plasma cleaning was tested as a convenient
way to remove the upper polymer layers on the surface. However, due
to heating,[34−36] the silica nanospheres were also disordered by the
melting and deformation of the polymer as shown in the Supporting Information, Figure S1. Another surface
etching technique is ion milling[37] where
Ar+ ions bombard and decompose the polymers. As this generates
less heat the ordering of silica nanospheres is maintained. We therefore
chose ion milling to etch away sufficient polymer to enhance the surface
profile enough for imprinting. As ion milling also leads to the simultaneous
etching of silica nanospheres, we limited the milling time to <4
min at a beam voltage of 500 V, for which the etching of polymer is
faster than of silica. The resulted POFs after ion-milling are shown
in Figure 1d (top view) and Figure 1e (30° tilted view). The surface morphology
of the POFs was composed of partially embedded silica nanospheres
with regular spacing, over very larger areas (>1 cm2). The AFM image in the inset of Figure 1f
shows much higher image contrast compared to before etching (Figure 1c) and the surface profile shows the expected periodic
corrugations of the surface height. The exposed face of the silica
nanospheres is around 15 nm in height and 200 nm in diameter (right
inset of Figure 1f).The silica sphere
arrays now form a rigid stamp suitable for nanoimprinting, despite
their support on the underlying flexible polymer films. Compared to
typical nanoimprinting with silica bead arrays in which transfer of
the nanoparticles to the imprinted films is often seen, it is not
observed here. The sticky
layer of PMMA/PEA thus plays a key role in retaining the integrity
of silica nanospheres within the POFs during imprinting, and thus
the imprinting stamp can be used many times.(a) SEM and (b) AFM images
of Al nanovoids. Scale bars are 1 and 2 μm, respectively. The
inset in a shows the cm-sized imprinted nanovoid, scale bar is 5 mm.
Inset in b is the fast Fourier transfer (FFT) of the AFM image, showing
well-defined order. (c) Surface height profile of the nanovoids, inset
is zoomed view. (d) Dark field scattering spectra of the Al nanovoids,
showing experimental data (red line), simulation (blue dashed), and
control for flat Al films (black solid line). Insets are the electric
field profile of the Al nanovoids at the spectral peak.Regular arrays of Al nanovoids are generated after
the imprinting and metal coating process (Figure 2a). The AFM image in Figure 2b confirms
the ordered arrays of nanovoids with honeycomb-like arrangement, which
is the negative print of the silica array on the POF stamp. The height
profile in Figure 2c shows a 20 nm maximum
depth across the 180 nm diameter of the nanovoids, which almost exactly
matches (see the Supporting Information, Figure S3) the feature sizes of the original POF stamp (diameter
200 nm, 15 nm height in crest). Although the short-range order is
very good with domain sizes of several microns, the long rang order
is interspersed with occasional defects. These defects observable
in the AFM image (Figure 2b) are of height
∼30 nm and occur on only <8% of sites introduced during
the imprinting process. They originate both from flakes of PMMA/PEA
detaching after etching the silica nanospheres in the POF stamps,
and from defects of the stamps.
Figure 2
(a) SEM and (b) AFM images
of Al nanovoids. Scale bars are 1 and 2 μm, respectively. The
inset in a shows the cm-sized imprinted nanovoid, scale bar is 5 mm.
Inset in b is the fast Fourier transfer (FFT) of the AFM image, showing
well-defined order. (c) Surface height profile of the nanovoids, inset
is zoomed view. (d) Dark field scattering spectra of the Al nanovoids,
showing experimental data (red line), simulation (blue dashed), and
control for flat Al films (black solid line). Insets are the electric
field profile of the Al nanovoids at the spectral peak.
To investigate the plasmonic
scattering of the Al nanovoids in the UV spectral range, a dark field
scattering measurement rig was constructed (see the Supporting Information, Figure S2). A UV light source is focused
through an UV-transparent lens onto the surface of the sample and
a 40× reflecting objective (NA = 0.5) collects the scattered
light which is directed either to a camera for dark field imaging
or to a spectrometer to record the scattering spectra (Figure 2d). A plasmonic-enhanced scattering peak is clearly
seen around 290 nm for the films of Al nanovoids (red line), whereas
no plasmonic scattering was seen from flat Al films (black line, a
zoom-in figure is shown in Figure S4 in the Supporting
Information). The simulated spectra (Lumerical FDTD) of Al
nanovoids (blue dashed line) shows their first order resonance at
282 nm, which matches well with the experimental data. The additional
shoulder around 330 nm in the experimental data likely stems from
voids which are closer and plasmonically couple, red-shifting their
modes. The optical field distribution on the patterned surface (TE
and TM modes in inset of Figure 2d) both show
strong electric fields concentrated within the nanovoids, which thus
provides an ideal environment for UV-SERS measurements.UV Raman spectra
of adenine: (a) 1 mM of adenine aqueous solution on Al nanovoids (red
line) and flat Al films (black line), (b) bulk adenine powders.To investigate the potential for
UV-SERS, we used adenine as a test molecule. An aqueous solution (1
mM) of adenine was drop-cast onto the nanovoid substrate which was
subsequently covered by a quartz coverslip for UV-SERS measurements,
forming a thin film of analyte solution on the substrate. The measurements
were performed in the solution phase to reduce any molecular degradation,
and simulate biochemical sensor conditions. The Raman signal was collected
by a Raman system with an excitation laser at 244 nm with total integration
time of 30 s (Renishaw). Since higher laser powers induce some photodegradation
of the substrate, laser powers below 0.3 mW were used. The UV laser
spot diameter was 5 μm. Given the lattice parameter of our array
(∼200 nm), we estimate that a typical spectrum contains ∼500
nanovoids. At the pump wavelength (244 nm), both SERS and conventional
Raman measurements are in the resonant Raman condition. The SERS enhancement
factors quoted below are therefore stated on top of the electronic
resonant enhancement. The adenine SERS and Raman spectra (Figure 3a) clearly show the four Raman peaks of adenine
(1248, 1332, 1497, and 1620 cm–1) with intensity
around 5 counts/mW/s for the 1332 cm–1 peak, while
for the flat Al film these peaks are barely seen. Moreover, the UV-SERS
signal is highly reproducible across the entire Al nanovoid substrate
(see the Supporting Information, Figure
S5), which reflects the uniformity of Al nanovoid arrays across the
substrate. The relatively larger noise for UV SERS compared with our
previous report[16] is mainly due to the
shorter accumulation time needed to avoid photodegradation of this
molecular sample. To further confirm the key contribution from UV
resonant plasmons, we checked with excitation wavelengths of 633 nm,
and no SERS peaks were observed at all due to excitation far off resonance.
The UV-SERS signal of 1 mM adenine obtained from these Al nanovoids
is almost of the same intensity as the signals obtained from bulk
adenine powder (Figure 3b). The powder form
allows the most accurate estimation of the enhancement factors which
are rarely stated in the literature in the deep-UV regime. Previous
reports for Pd, Rh, and Ru provide only 2 orders of magnitude enhancement
factors.[10,11] Sigle et al.[16] give enhancements of up to 6 orders of magnitude, but this is only
given for the hot-spot region rather than averaged over the entire
sample. A similar value inside a bow-tie antenna is given by Li et
al.[17] Here, we state a global enhancement
value over the entire sample which we believe is more relevant for
a sensing platform. Taking into account the adenine extinction coefficient
and the corresponding optical penetration depth in the adenine crystals
allows an estimate of the number of molecules in the probe volume.
From an adenine extinction coefficient of 1.5 × 104 M–1 cm–1 and molecule diameter
of ∼2 nm, we estimate that the number of molecules in the powder
form interacting with the laser is ∼4 × 1012. This can be compared to the number of molecules contributing to
the SERS signal (given by the molecular concentration of 1 mM, a void
volume of 2 × 106 nm3 and a total number
of ∼500 probed voids, which gives 5.9 × 108 molecules contributing to the SERS) and allows determination of
the SERS enhancement factor (on top of resonant electronic enhancements
always obtained at this wavelength). We estimate this enhancement
to be ∼5 × 103 averaged over the plasmonic
surface, which is much higher than previously reported values on such
large areas[16,18] and is attributed to the near-defect-free
fabrication of the surface. These results clearly demonstrate the
capability of using aluminum for plasmonic UV-sensing platforms on
a large scale.
Figure 3
UV Raman spectra
of adenine: (a) 1 mM of adenine aqueous solution on Al nanovoids (red
line) and flat Al films (black line), (b) bulk adenine powders.
In conclusion, we have developed a large scale
Al nanovoid-type substrate for UV-SERS detection based on simple nanofabricaton
techniques, combining nanoassembly, ion milling, nanoimprinting and
e-beam evaporation. The unique advantage of using nanoimprinting rather
than colloidal lithography to generate these nanovoids is the much
more facile and scalable fabrication, which produces stamps that can
be reused many times and thus are suited for integrating into large-scale
rollers in a roll-to-roll process. The well-developed polymer opal
system makes the preparation of the colloidal stamps straightforward,
enabled by the massive scalability and high quality of the POFs, as
well as the intrinsically sticky polymer matrix, which maintains the
integrity of the colloidal stamp. The nanovoid geometry is capable
of generating concentrated plasmonic fields localized at the edge
and interior of the nanovoids, which enhance the Raman signal of adenine
more than 3 orders of magnitude compared to planar metal substrates.
Such UV-SERS substrates are of great potential interest for the detection
of various biomolecules in assays, and flow processes, as well as
for environmental sensing and biomedical screening.
Authors: L Cui; S Mahajan; R M Cole; B Soares; P N Bartlett; J J Baumberg; I P Hayward; B Ren; A E Russell; Z Q Tian Journal: Phys Chem Chem Phys Date: 2008-12-18 Impact factor: 3.676
Authors: Kevin J Savage; Matthew M Hawkeye; Rubén Esteban; Andrei G Borisov; Javier Aizpurua; Jeremy J Baumberg Journal: Nature Date: 2012-11-07 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Evelyn Kämmer; Thomas Dörfer; Andrea Csáki; Wilm Schumacher; Paulo Augusto Da Costa Filho; Nicolae Tarcea; Wolfgang Fritzsche; Petra Rösch; Michael Schmitt; Jürgen Popp Journal: J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces Date: 2012-02-14 Impact factor: 4.126
Authors: Marcin Pisarek; Robert Ambroziak; Marcin Hołdyński; Agata Roguska; Anna Majchrowicz; Bartłomiej Wysocki; Andrzej Kudelski Journal: Materials (Basel) Date: 2022-04-25 Impact factor: 3.748