Literature DB >> 25291380

Structural heterogeneity modulates effective refractory period: a mechanism of focal arrhythmia initiation.

Martin J Bishop1, Adam Connolly1, Gernot Plank2.   

Abstract

Reductions in electrotonic loading around regions of structural and electrophysiological heterogeneity may facilitate capture of focal triggered activity, initiating reentrant arrhythmias. How electrotonic loading, refractoriness and capture of focal ectopics depend upon the intricate nature of physiological structural anatomy, as well as pathological tissue remodelling, however, is not well understood. In this study, we performed computational bidomain simulations with anatomically-detailed models representing the rabbit left ventricle. We used these models to quantify the relationship between local structural anatomy and spatial heterogeneity in action potential (AP) characteristics, electrotonic currents and effective refractory periods (ERPs) under pacing and restitution protocols. Regions surrounding vessel cavities, in addition to tissue surfaces, had significantly lower peak downstream electrotonic currents than well coupled myocardium (72.6 vs 220.4 μA/cm2), with faster maximum AP upstroke velocities (257.3 vs 147.3 mV/ms), although noticeably very similar APDs (167.7 vs 168.4 ms) and AP restitution properties. Despite similarities in APDs, ERPs in regions of low electrotonic load in the vicinity of surfaces, intramural vessel cavities and endocardial structures were up to 40 ms shorter compared to neighbouring well-coupled tissue, leading to regions of sharp ERP gradients. Consequently, focal extra-stimuli timed within this window of ERP heterogeneity between neighbouring regions readily induced uni-directional block, inducing reentry. Most effective induction sites were within channels of low ERPs between large vessels and epicardium. Significant differences in ERP driven by reductions in electrotonic loading due to fine-scale physiological structural heterogeneity provides an important mechanism of capture of focal activity and reentry induction. Application to pathological ventricles, particularly myocardial infarction, will have important implications in anti-arrhythmia therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25291380      PMCID: PMC4188572          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109754

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  29 in total

1.  Effect of activation sequence on transmural patterns of repolarization and action potential duration in rabbit ventricular myocardium.

Authors:  Rachel C Myles; Olivier Bernus; Francis L Burton; Stuart M Cobbe; Godfrey L Smith
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 4.733

2.  A rabbit ventricular action potential model replicating cardiac dynamics at rapid heart rates.

Authors:  Aman Mahajan; Yohannes Shiferaw; Daisuke Sato; Ali Baher; Riccardo Olcese; Lai-Hua Xie; Ming-Jim Yang; Peng-Sheng Chen; Juan G Restrepo; Alain Karma; Alan Garfinkel; Zhilin Qu; James N Weiss
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Cardiac tissue geometry as a determinant of unidirectional conduction block: assessment of microscopic excitation spread by optical mapping in patterned cell cultures and in a computer model.

Authors:  V G Fast; A G Kléber
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 10.787

4.  Electrotonic influences on action potential duration dispersion in small hearts: a simulation study.

Authors:  Kevin J Sampson; Craig S Henriquez
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2005-02-25       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 5.  Atrial fibrillation pathophysiology: implications for management.

Authors:  Yu-ki Iwasaki; Kunihiro Nishida; Takeshi Kato; Stanley Nattel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Generation of histo-anatomically representative models of the individual heart: tools and application.

Authors:  Gernot Plank; Rebecca A B Burton; Patrick Hales; Martin Bishop; Tahir Mansoori; Miguel O Bernabeu; Alan Garny; Anton J Prassl; Christian Bollensdorff; Fleur Mason; Fahd Mahmood; Blanca Rodriguez; Vicente Grau; Jürgen E Schneider; David Gavaghan; Peter Kohl
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2009-06-13       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  Basic mechanisms of cardiac impulse propagation and associated arrhythmias.

Authors:  André G Kléber; Yoram Rudy
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 37.312

8.  Representing cardiac bidomain bath-loading effects by an augmented monodomain approach: application to complex ventricular models.

Authors:  Martin J Bishop; Gernot Plank
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Electrophysiological and structural determinants of electrotonic modulation of repolarization by the activation sequence.

Authors:  Richard D Walton; Alan P Benson; Matthew E L Hardy; Ed White; Olivier Bernus
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Development of an anatomically detailed MRI-derived rabbit ventricular model and assessment of its impact on simulations of electrophysiological function.

Authors:  Martin J Bishop; Gernot Plank; Rebecca A B Burton; Jürgen E Schneider; David J Gavaghan; Vicente Grau; Peter Kohl
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 4.733

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  From Incidental, Mechanically-Induced Arrhythmias to Reflex-Defined Arrhythmogenicity: On The Track of The Ternary Reflex System Resemblance to The "Infancy" of New Era or Rediscovery.

Authors:  Petras Stirbys
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2016-02-29

2.  Local Gradients in Electrotonic Loading Modulate the Local Effective Refractory Period: Implications for Arrhythmogenesis in the Infarct Border Zone.

Authors:  Adam Connolly; Mark L Trew; Bruce H Smaill; Gernot Plank; Martin J Bishop
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Right ventricular insertion promotes reinitiation of ventricular fibrillation in defibrillation failure.

Authors:  Kenichi Iijima; Hanyu Zhang; Matthew T Strachan; Jian Huang; Gregory P Walcott; Jack M Rogers
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 6.779

4.  Myocardial electrotonic response to submaximal exercise in dogs with healed myocardial infarctions: evidence for β-adrenoceptor mediated enhanced coupling during exercise testing.

Authors:  Carlos L Del Rio; Bradley D Clymer; George E Billman
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 5.  Cardiac dynamics: Alternans and arrhythmogenesis.

Authors:  Gary Tse; Sheung Ting Wong; Vivian Tse; Yee Ting Lee; Hiu Yu Lin; Jie Ming Yeo
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2016-03-28

Review 6.  Computational Representations of Myocardial Infarct Scars and Implications for Arrhythmogenesis.

Authors:  Adam J Connolly; Martin J Bishop
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Cardiol       Date:  2016-07-26

7.  Bidomain Predictions of Virtual Electrode-Induced Make and Break Excitations around Blood Vessels.

Authors:  Adam J Connolly; Edward Vigmond; Martin J Bishop
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2017-03-27

8.  Arrhythmogenic effects of ultra-long and bistable cardiac action potentials.

Authors:  Stewart Heitmann; Anton Shpak; Jamie I Vandenberg; Adam P Hill
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Calibrating cardiac electrophysiology models using latent Gaussian processes on atrial manifolds.

Authors:  Sam Coveney; Caroline H Roney; Cesare Corrado; Richard D Wilkinson; Jeremy E Oakley; Steven A Niederer; Richard H Clayton
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 4.996

10.  Ventricular Endocardial Tissue Geometry Affects Stimulus Threshold and Effective Refractory Period.

Authors:  Adam Connolly; Allen Kelly; Fernando O Campos; Rachel Myles; Godfrey Smith; Martin J Bishop
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 4.033

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.