Mark R Perry1, Eric M Benson2, Jonathon W Kohne2, Jennifer L Plahovinsak2, Michael C Babin2, Gennady E Platoff3, David T Yeung4. 1. Battelle Biomedical Research Center, Columbus, OH 43201, USA. Electronic address: perrym@battelle.org. 2. Battelle Biomedical Research Center, Columbus, OH 43201, USA. 3. National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. 4. National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: A custom designed HD exposure system was used to deliver controlled inhaled doses to an animal model through an endotracheal tube. METHODS: Target HD vapor challenges were generated by a temperature controlled bubbler/aerosol trap, while concentration was monitored near real-time by gas chromatography. Animal breathing parameters were monitored real-time by an in-line pneumotach, pressure transducer, and Buxco pulmonary analysis computer/software. For each exposure, the challenge atmosphere was allowed to stabilize at the desired concentration while the anesthetized animal was provided humidity controlled clean air. Once the target concentration was achieved and stable, a portion of the challenge atmosphere was drawn past the endotracheal tube, where the animal inhaled the exposure ad libitum. During the exposure, HD vapor concentration and animal weight were used to calculate the needed inhaled volume to achieve the target inhaled dose (μg/kg). The exposures were halted when the inhaled volume was achieved. RESULTS: The exposure system successfully controlled HD concentrations from 22.2 to 278mg/m(3) and accurately delivered inhaled doses between 49.3 and 1120μg/kg with actual administered doses being within 4% of the target level. DISCUSSION: This exposure system administers specific HD inhaled doses to evaluate physiological effects and for evaluation of potential medical countermeasure treatments.
INTRODUCTION: A custom designed HD exposure system was used to deliver controlled inhaled doses to an animal model through an endotracheal tube. METHODS: Target HD vapor challenges were generated by a temperature controlled bubbler/aerosol trap, while concentration was monitored near real-time by gas chromatography. Animal breathing parameters were monitored real-time by an in-line pneumotach, pressure transducer, and Buxco pulmonary analysis computer/software. For each exposure, the challenge atmosphere was allowed to stabilize at the desired concentration while the anesthetized animal was provided humidity controlled clean air. Once the target concentration was achieved and stable, a portion of the challenge atmosphere was drawn past the endotracheal tube, where the animal inhaled the exposure ad libitum. During the exposure, HD vapor concentration and animal weight were used to calculate the needed inhaled volume to achieve the target inhaled dose (μg/kg). The exposures were halted when the inhaled volume was achieved. RESULTS: The exposure system successfully controlled HD concentrations from 22.2 to 278mg/m(3) and accurately delivered inhaled doses between 49.3 and 1120μg/kg with actual administered doses being within 4% of the target level. DISCUSSION: This exposure system administers specific HD inhaled doses to evaluate physiological effects and for evaluation of potential medical countermeasure treatments.
Authors: Heidi C O'Neill; David J Orlicky; Tara B Hendry-Hofer; Joan E Loader; Brian J Day; Carl W White Journal: Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol Date: 2011-06-03 Impact factor: 6.914
Authors: B Jugg; S Fairhall; A Smith; S Rutter; T Mann; R Perrott; J Jenner; J Salguero; J Shute; A M Sciuto Journal: Clin Toxicol (Phila) Date: 2013-04-02 Impact factor: 4.467
Authors: Raymond C Rancourt; Livia A Veress; Xiaoling Guo; Tara N Jones; Tara B Hendry-Hofer; Carl W White Journal: Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol Date: 2011-09-30 Impact factor: 5.464
Authors: S J Fairhall; B J A Jugg; R W Read; S J Stubbs; S J Rutter; A J Smith; T M Mann; J Jenner; A M Sciuto Journal: Inhal Toxicol Date: 2010-11-18 Impact factor: 2.724
Authors: Livia A Veress; Tara B Hendry-Hofer; Joan E Loader; Jacqueline S Rioux; Rhonda B Garlick; Carl W White Journal: Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 6.914