OBJECTIVES: Environmental exposures during military deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan may lead to higher rates of respiratory complaints and diagnoses. This study investigates whether there is a relationship between rates of asthma diagnosis and severity associated with military deployment. METHODS: Retrospective review of active duty Army personnel underwent fitness for duty evaluation (Medical Evaluation Board) for asthma. The electronic medical record was reviewed for onset of diagnosis (pre- or post-deployment), disease severity, screening spirometry, bronchodilator response and bronchoprovocation testing. We compared patients with and without a history of combat deployment to Operations Iraqi Freedom/Enduring Freedom. RESULTS: Four hundred consecutive Army personnel with a clinical diagnosis of asthma were evaluated. Equal numbers of patients had deployed (48.5%) versus never deployed (51.5%). Of those who deployed, 98 (24.5%) were diagnosed post-deployment. The diagnosis of asthma was objectively confirmed in 74.8% of patients by obstructive screening spirometry, bronchodilator response, and/or methacholine challenge testing. There were no significant differences in spirometry between deployers and non-deployers or based on pre- and post-deployment diagnosis. Similarly, asthma severity classification did not differ between deployed and non-deployed service members, or by pre- and post-deployment diagnosis status. CONCLUSIONS: Among active duty military personnel with career limiting asthma, there is no significant relationship between rates of diagnosis or severity based on history of deployment to Southwest Asia.
OBJECTIVES: Environmental exposures during military deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan may lead to higher rates of respiratory complaints and diagnoses. This study investigates whether there is a relationship between rates of asthma diagnosis and severity associated with military deployment. METHODS: Retrospective review of active duty Army personnel underwent fitness for duty evaluation (Medical Evaluation Board) for asthma. The electronic medical record was reviewed for onset of diagnosis (pre- or post-deployment), disease severity, screening spirometry, bronchodilator response and bronchoprovocation testing. We compared patients with and without a history of combat deployment to Operations Iraqi Freedom/Enduring Freedom. RESULTS: Four hundred consecutive Army personnel with a clinical diagnosis of asthma were evaluated. Equal numbers of patients had deployed (48.5%) versus never deployed (51.5%). Of those who deployed, 98 (24.5%) were diagnosed post-deployment. The diagnosis of asthma was objectively confirmed in 74.8% of patients by obstructive screening spirometry, bronchodilator response, and/or methacholine challenge testing. There were no significant differences in spirometry between deployers and non-deployers or based on pre- and post-deployment diagnosis. Similarly, asthma severity classification did not differ between deployed and non-deployed service members, or by pre- and post-deployment diagnosis status. CONCLUSIONS: Among active duty military personnel with career limiting asthma, there is no significant relationship between rates of diagnosis or severity based on history of deployment to Southwest Asia.
Entities:
Keywords:
Asthma; deployment; military personnel; pulmonary function testing
Authors: Cristian S Madar; Michael R Lewin-Smith; Teri J Franks; Russell A Harley; John S Klaric; Michael J Morris Journal: Lung Date: 2017-05-23 Impact factor: 2.584
Authors: Eric Garshick; Joseph H Abraham; Coleen P Baird; Paul Ciminera; Gregory P Downey; Michael J Falvo; Jaime E Hart; David A Jackson; Michael Jerrett; Ware Kuschner; Drew A Helmer; Kirk D Jones; Silpa D Krefft; Timothy Mallon; Robert F Miller; Michael J Morris; Susan P Proctor; Carrie A Redlich; Cecile S Rose; Rudolph P Rull; Johannes Saers; Aaron I Schneiderman; Nicholas L Smith; Panayiotis Yiallouros; Paul D Blanc Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2019-08
Authors: Anna C Rivera; Teresa M Powell; Edward J Boyko; Rachel U Lee; Dennis J Faix; David D Luxton; Rudolph P Rull Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 4.897