Trichothiodystrophy (TTD) is a rare multisystem disorder, characterized by sulfur-deficient hair with alternating dark and light "tiger tail" banding on polarized light microscopy. TTD is caused by mutations in DNA repair/transcription genes XPD, XPB or TTDA, and in TTDN1, a gene of unknown function. Although most of the TTD patients are photosensitive, patients with TTDN1 mutations were reported to be nonphotosensitive. We followed a cohort of 36 TTD patients from 2001 to 2013. We describe five patients from four families with defects in the TTDN1 gene: four had no photosensitivity, and one patient exhibited cutaneous burning. Deep phenotyping of our cohort revealed differences between the patients with and without TTDN1 mutations. Delayed bone age and seizure disorders were overrepresented in the TTDN1 group (P=0.009 and P=0.024, respectively), whereas some characteristic TTD clinical, laboratory, and imaging findings were absent. The three oldest TTDN1 patients displayed autistic behaviors in contrast to the characteristic friendly, socially interactive personality in the other patients. DNA sequencing revealed deletion mutations in TTDN1 ranging in size from a single base pair to over 120 kb. These data identify a distinct phenotype relationship in TTD caused by TTDN1 mutations and suggest a different mechanism of disease.
Trichothiodystrophy (TTD) is a rare multisystem disorder, characterized by sulfur-deficient hair with alternating dark and light "tiger tail" banding on polarized light microscopy. TTD is caused by mutations in DNA repair/transcription genes XPD, XPB or TTDA, and in TTDN1, a gene of unknown function. Although most of the TTDpatients are photosensitive, patients with TTDN1 mutations were reported to be nonphotosensitive. We followed a cohort of 36 TTDpatients from 2001 to 2013. We describe five patients from four families with defects in the TTDN1 gene: four had no photosensitivity, and one patient exhibited cutaneous burning. Deep phenotyping of our cohort revealed differences between the patients with and without TTDN1 mutations. Delayed bone age and seizure disorders were overrepresented in the TTDN1 group (P=0.009 and P=0.024, respectively), whereas some characteristic TTD clinical, laboratory, and imaging findings were absent. The three oldest TTDN1 patients displayed autistic behaviors in contrast to the characteristic friendly, socially interactive personality in the other patients. DNA sequencing revealed deletion mutations in TTDN1 ranging in size from a single base pair to over 120 kb. These data identify a distinct phenotype relationship in TTD caused by TTDN1 mutations and suggest a different mechanism of disease.
Trichothiodystrophy (TTD) is a rare, autosomal recessive disorder associated with defects in DNA repair/transcription genes. Diagnostic features include short, brittle, sulfur-deficient hair with a pattern of alternating light and dark “tiger-tail” bands under polarized light microscopy (Baden et al. 1976; Price et al. 1980; Liang et al. 2005; Liang et al. 2006). Additional features include photosensitivity in approximately half of these patients, ichthyosis, developmental delay, short stature, congenital dysmorphism, maternal pregnancy complications, collodian membrane at birth, and hematologic, ophthalmologic, and skeletal abnormalities. TTD is also associated with early mortality; affected patients have a 20-fold increased risk of death before age 10 (Faghri et al. 2008).Causative mutations are found in the DNA repair/ transcription genes, XPD, XPB or TTDA (DiGiovanna and Kraemer 2012). TTDN1 (Trichothiodystrophy nonphotosensitive 1; C7ORF11, MPLKIP), a gene of unknown function, is a cause of the non-photosensitive TTD phenotype (Nakabayashi et al. 2005; Stefanini et al. 2010). Previous reports of TTDN1-associated TTD have identified several heterogeneous deletions in the gene, ranging from one base pair to 11-31 kb in size (Nakabayashi et al. 2005; Botta et al. 2007). Patients reported in the literature have been uniformly non-photosensitive, however no genotype-phenotype correlations have been found beyond these observations (Nakabayashi et al. 2005; Botta et al. 2007).Our study employed deep phenotyping, a comprehensive analysis of phenotypic abnormalities using a detailed database (Boland et al. 2013), to more precisely describe a subgroup of patients with this rare genetic disorder. We sought a genotype-phenotype correlation in order to gain better insight both into the function of the underlying gene and the overall pathogenicity of the disorder. This may also serve as a model for future phenotyping studies given burgeoning interest in this methodology [reviewed in (Robinson 2012)]. In the following study, we report 5 additional TTDpatients with confirmed defects in TTDN1 from our cohort and suggest that there is a distinct phenotype in TTDN1 patients.
Results and Discussion
Clinical features and mutations in 5 TTDN1 patients
We evaluated 36 patients with features consistent with TTD at the NIH (Liang et al. 2005; Liang et al. 2006; Schlucker et al. 2006; Boyle et al. 2008; Moslehi et al. 2010; Zhou et al. 2010; Brooks et al. 2011; Tamura et al. 2011; Tamura et al. 2012; Zhou et al. 2013; Atkinson et al. 2014). Of the 36 patients enrolled in our protocol, 20 were identified with mutations in XPD, 3 with TTDA mutations, 8 with unknown mutations, and 5 with mutations in TTDN1. The TTDN1 patients ranged in age from 1 to 14 years at last NIH evaluation, and came from 4 different families (Fig. 1a-f). Two patients (TTD487BE and TTD488BE) are affected siblings (Figure 1 c and d).
Fig. 1
Characteristics of 5 TTDN1 patients
All patients have coarse hair with characteristic “tiger-tail” banding and hair shaft abnormalities under polarized light microscopy. a) Patient TTD402BE, 14 year old boy. b) Patient TTD480BE, 4 year old girl. c) Patient TTD487BE, 2 year old girl. d) Patient TTD488BE, age 1(brother of patient TTD487BE). e) Patient TTD343BE, 14 year old boy. f) Alternating light and dark (“tiger-tail”) banding (red arrow), and hair shaft abnormalities (black arrow) in TTD402BE under polarized light microscopy. g and h) Patient TTD343BE is exquisitely sensitive to UV, g)burning (red arrows) on brief exposure to an uncovered fluorescent light fixture in an area of the face that was not completely shielded by a hat with brim and sideshield (h) compared to his appearance before exposure (e).. The other TTDN1 patients are non-photosensitive. Parents of these 5 patients gave permission to publish these images of their children and their clinical information.
Patient Cases and TTDN1 Mutations
PatientTTD402BE, a Caucasian male (Fig 1 a), was born at 36 weeks gestation following a pregnancy complicated by preterm labor. He was hypotonic at birth, but neither collodian membrane nor cataracts were present. In early childhood his scalp hair was sparse and brittle, but improved in texture and length by age 6. He was mildly photophobic, but his skin did not burn on exposure to UV. He developed recurrent otitis media, requiring 2 sets of PE (pressure equalizing) tubes. All developmental milestones were delayed; he walked at 19 months and continued to display poor expressive speech and articulation as well as intellectual impairment. He was diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder at age 10 based on repetitive and obsessive behaviors, poor expressive speech, and difficulty in socialization. At age 14, he was 50th percentile for height and 75th for weight. He exhibited hair findings typical of TTD, including coarse, sulfur-deficient hair (sulfur content 2.9%, normal = 5.0%) with tiger-tail banding on polarized light microscopy and sparse lateral eyebrows. Minimal facial freckling, beaked nails, and xerosis (but not ichthyosis) were noted on skin exam. Other features included high-arched palate, retrognathia, mild pectus excavatum, mild genu valgus, pes planus, scoliosis, myopia, nystagmus, and sialorrhea. Skeletal imaging at age 10 years revealed generalized osteopenia without central osteosclerosis, spina bifida occulta at C7/T1, and normal bone age. CT bone densitometry found his average bone mineral density to be 128.7 mg/cc which is 2.72 standard deviations below age matched control (z-score). A unilateral left kidney was found on abdominal ultrasound. There was no evidence of dysmyelination on brain MRI at age 10 years despite his developmental delay. Blood results including hemoglobin, hematocrit, MCV, and RBC, neutrophil and lymphocyte counts, as well as hemoglobin electrophoresis, were normal. DNA sequencing of TTD402BE's cells revealed two different heterozygous mutations in the initiation codon of TTDN1. The first allele contained the maternally inherited mutation c.2T>G; a paternally inherited mutation c.2T>C was identified in the second allele (Table 1, Figs. 2 and S1). This likely results in the loss of translation initiation and thus no protein production.
Table 1
Mutations of all known TTD patients with defects in TTDN1
ALLELE 1 (maternal)
ALLELE 2 (paternal)
Patient
Photo-sensitive
Age/Sex
Genomic mutation
Protein change
Genomic mutation
Protein change
References
TTD5PV
No
8/F
Deletion of 11-31kb
No protein
Homozygous
Botta et al. 2007, Fois et al. 1988
TTD10RO
No
3/M
Deletion of at least 150 kb
No protein
Homozygous
Botta et al. 2007
TTD16PV
No
4/F
c.148_152delCACAC
p.His50Alafs*8
Homozygous
Botta et al. 2007
TTD31PV
No
3/F
c.148_152delCACAC
p.His50Alafs*8
c.277delT
p.Ser93Profs*60
Botta et al. 2007
TTD1MA
No
6/F
c.229delC
p.Arg77Glyfs*76
Homozygous
Botta et al. 2007
TTD11RO
No
3/F
c.277delT
p.Ser93Profs*60
Homozygous
Botta et al. 2007
Moroccan Siblings
No
16/M4/F13m/F
c.187_188delGG
57 residue truncated protein
Homozygous
Nakabayashi et al. 2005, Przedborski et al. 1990
Amish brittle-hair brain syndrome
No
20 Amish patients
c.480A>G
p.Met144Val
Homozygous
Nakabayashi et al. 2005, Jackson et al. 1974
TTD9PV
No
3/F
Partial deletion of exon 1 and entire exon 2
No protein (probable)
Homozygous
Nakabayashi et al. 2005, Rizzo et al. 1992
TTD402BE
No
14/M
c.2T>C (initiation codon)
No protein
c.2T>G (initiation codon)
No protein
This paper
TTD480BE
No
4/F
Deletion of ~120kb
No protein
c.227delG
p.Gly76Alafs*77
This paper
TTD487BETTD488BE
No
2/F1/M
c. 277delT
p.Ser93Profs*60
Deletion of ~92 kb
No protein
This paper
TTD343BE
Yes
14/M
4 bp insertion & deletion of ~5kb starting at c.279
No protein
Homozygous
This paper
Figure 2
Mutations in the TTDN1 protein
The 179 amino acid TTDN1 protein is shown. (Normal protein) Glycine/proline rich regions are colored, with low complexity regions shown in blue and purple and highly conserved C-terminal regions (CR1 and CR2) marked. Mutations reported in Nakabayashi et al. (2005) and reported in Botta et al. (2005) are shown with standard black lettering and mutations reported in this paper are in bold blue lettering (Table 1). The mutations above the normal protein are large deletions (indicated by dashed lines). Mutations below the normal protein are missense (indicated by an arrow) and one or two base frameshifts followed by an abnormal amino acid sequence (indicated by narrow lines ending at the site of the premature termination codon). Alleles are denoted by a 1 and/or 2 following the patient identification numbers. Mutation nomenclature and cDNA numbering follow standard formatting (Botta et al., 2007).
Patient TTD480BE, a Caucasian female (Figure 1b), was born at term after an uncomplicated pregnancy. The neonatal period was unremarkable and the patient did not have low birth weight, collodian membrane or congenital cataracts; feeding difficulties were noted in infancy. She was not photosensitive. She experienced recurrent otitis media necessitating 3 sets of PE tubes. All developmental milestones were delayed. She walked at age 3 and at her last NIH visit at age 4, she spoke few rudimentary words. At this visit, her height and weight were in the 10th and 5th percentiles respectively. She displayed sparse, brittle, sulfur-deficient hair (sulfur content 2.4%, normal = 5.0%) with tiger-tail banding under polarized light microscopy (Fig. 1f), and sparse eyebrows with broken eyelashes. Skin exam revealed generalized xerosis (not ichthyosis) with multiple freckle-like macules over the nose and cheeks, a periumbilical café au lait spot, and dystrophic, peeling fingernails and toenails. Other features included diffuse hypotonia, sialorrhea, strabismus, hyperopia, epicanthal folds with mild telecanthus, high nasal bridge, micrognathia, genu valgus, pes planus, and clinodactyly of the right hand. Imaging showed delayed bone age (estimated age 2 years, 3 months) with mild osteopenia, and right sided aortic arch with aberrant left subclavian artery. There was no evidence of dysmyelination on brain MRI. Hemoglobin, hematocrit, MCV, hemoglobin A2, and RBC, neutrophil, and lymphocyte counts were all normal. Three years later, she was undergoing evaluation for autism spectrum disorder due to new onset repetitive behaviors and verbal delay. Array comparative genome hybridization (aCGH) revealed a greater than 120 kb deletion in the maternally inherited allele, resulting in hemizygosity in TTDN1. A single base pair deletion was found at c.227 in the paternally inherited TTDN1 allele, leading to a frame shift and stop codon formation 77 residues downstream (Table 1, Figs. 2 and S2). It is unlikely that a functional protein would result from these mutations.Patients TTD487BE and TTD488BE are Caucasian siblings, a sister and brother respectively (Figure 1 c and d). They were each born at term following uncomplicated pregnancies. Both siblings were non-photosensitive, mildly hypotonic, and experienced recurrent upper respiratory infections and otitis media. They were diagnosed with developmental delay at age 1 for TTD487BE, and 8 months for TTD488BE. Cardiac structural defects were found in both siblings - atrial septal defect in TTD487BE and pulmonic stenosis in TTD488BE. Atonic seizure disorder was diagnosed in TTD487BE at 2 years of age and in TTD488BE at 18 months. At NIH, TTD487BE was 10th percentile for height and 25th for weight at age 2, while TTD488BE was 97th percentile for height and 50th for weight at age 1. Both siblings exhibited characteristic sparse, brittle, and sulfur-deficient hair (sulfur content 2.6% for TTD487BE and 2.35% for TTD488BE, normal = 5.0%) with tiger-tail banding under polarized light. Eyebrows and eyelashes were also sparse. Additional features for TTD487BE included epicanthal folds with mild telecanthus, micrognathia, simplified ears, protruding umbilicus, bilateral 4th-5th digit clinodactyly with low placed thumbs, genu valgus, pes planus, and sialorrhea. Follicular papules along the extremities and hypoplastic toenails were noted on her skin exam. TTD488BE displayed left ear crease, and cyanosis of the bilateral feet in addition to epicanthal folds, protuberant umbilicus, simplified ears, low placed thumbs and sialorrhea. His skin exam revealed keratosis pilaris and peeling nails, but not ichthyosis. MRI of the brain did not show evidence of dysmyelination in either patient. Radiographic studies revealed delayed bone age for both (estimated age 1 year, 6 months for TTD487BE and newborn for TTD488BE), but no osteosclerosis. Blood work was normal in both patients, with the exception of a low neutrophil count in TTD487BE. DNA sequence analysis revealed a single base deletion at c.277 on the maternally inherited allele for both siblings, leading to a frame shift and stop codon formation 60 residues downstream. An aCGH revealed an approximately 92 kb deletion in the paternally inherited allele, resulting in hemizygosity in TTDN1 for both siblings (Table 1, Figs. 2 and S3).Patient TTD343BE, a Caucasian male (Figure 1e, 1g-h), was born at term following an uncomplicated pregnancy. However, he developed fetal distress during labor and was delivered via emergency Caesarian-section. His birth weight was low (2450 grams). His infancy was remarkable for hypotonia, difficulty feeding, and failure to thrive. He had a history of severe photosensitivity, with burning and blistering after brief exposure to the sun. His mother described that, as an infant, if his bassinette was placed near a window “he would scream and his skin would become raw”. Consequently, he wore sunscreen and a hat with visor, neck and ear shields and sunscreen even when indoors (Figure 1h). We observed this exquisite photosensitivity when he began to complain of discomfort during a brief exposure to an unshielded fluorescent light while waiting in a hallway at NIH. Shortly thereafter, he developed a burn in an uncovered area of his face (Fig 1g). He developed recurrent upper respiratory and GI infections, necessitating multiple hospitalizations. He did not meet his developmental milestones appropriately, walking independently at age 4 and first speaking at age 8. At age 10, he was diagnosed with autism based on his language delay, repetitive behaviors and difficulty in socialization. He consistently grew at or below the 5th percentile for height and weight; at the NIH, he was <3rd percentile for both height and weight at age 14 years. He displayed typical hair findings for TTD, including coarse, sulfur-deficient hair (sulfur content 2.4%, normal = 5.0%) with tiger-tail banding under polarized light with few shaft abnormalities. His hair grew long and thick, an unusual finding for TTDpatients. His eyebrows and eyelashes were sparse and broken. Generalized xerosis and spooned, peeling nails were noted on skin exam. Additional features included epicanthal folds, prominent nose tip and high nasal bridge, smooth philtrum, mild micrognathia, retrognathia, pectus excavatum, and genu valgus, as well as pes planus, bilateral 2nd-3rd toe syndactyly and sialorrhea. Imaging revealed delayed bone age (estimated age 12 years, 6 months), but no evidence of dysmyelination on brain MRI. At age 24 he developed epilepsy with grand mal seizures. DNA sequencing of TTD343BE revealed homozygosity for a 4 bp insertion in the TTDN1 gene, followed by a 5 kb deletion starting at c.279 (Table 1, Fig. 2 and S4). Both parents were found to be heterozygous for this mutation. Because the deletion spans both exons of TTDN1, PCR amplification of genomic DNA did not yield a band for TTD343BE (Fig. S5). Bands can be seen for the 4 remaining TTDN1 patients, all of whom have at least one copy of the gene.
No increased sensitivity to UVC in TTDN1 cells
Defects in TTDN1 were believed to be a cause of the non-photosensitive TTD phenotype, as no reported cases in the literature were described to develop cutaneous burning on sun exposure (Nakabayashi et al. 2005; Botta et al. 2007). Similarly, 4 out of 5 TTDN1 patients in our cohort were non-photosensitive; however, 1 patient (TTD343BE) did exhibit exquisite photosensitivity. Of the 30 reported cases of TTDN1 [Table 1], no other patients were noted to be photosensitive.We performed UVC hypersensitivity studies on fibroblasts from each of the 4 TTDN1 families to measure their cellular sensitivity to UVC (Fig. 3). Fibroblasts from the photosensitive patient, TTD343BE, had a cellular response profile similar to those of the other, non-photosensitive, TTDN1 patients and the normal control. In contrast, fibroblasts from photosensitive XP and TTDpatients with mutations in XPD showed increased sensitivity to UV (Figure 3 and (Boyle et al. 2008)). By dissociating cell death from clinical photosensitivity, this result suggests that cell death is not required to stimulate inflammatory mediators which result in cutaneous burning. These findings also provide further evidence that TTDN1 does not play a role in transcription coupled - NER, unlike photosensitive TTD-associated genes XPD, TTDA and XPB (Nakabayashi et al. 2005; Stefanini et al. 2010). The TTDN1 protein has been reported to interact with Polo-like kinase 1 to help regulate cell cycle progression (Zhang et al. 2007), however this has not been confirmed.
Figure 3
Post-UV survival of TTDN1, XP and normal cell lines. Cell cultures were exposed to the indicated dose of UVC and post-UVC viability was assessed after 4 days using an MTS assay. One normal (FXP0223 [open circle]), four TTDN1 (TTD402BE [closed triangle], TTD480BE [closed circle], TTD487BE [open triangle] and TTD343BE [open square]), and one XP (XP29BE, open diamond) cells were used. Overlapping points were displaced for clarity. Interestingly, fibroblasts from photosensitive and non-photosensitive TTDN1 patients were not hypersensitive to UVC in contrast to cells from an XP patient with mutations in the XPD gene.
Deep phenotyping reveals a distinct TTDN1 genotype-phenotype relationship
Our detailed clinical analysis (Table S1) of a cohort of 36 patients exhibiting features of TTD uncovered a distinct genotype-phenotype relationship in patients with defects in TTDN1. As compared to patients with mutations in XPD, TTDA or unidentified genes, delayed bone age and seizure disorders were overrepresented in the TTDN1 group. There were 3 patients from 2 families with TTDN1 mutations (TTD343BE, and siblings TTD487BE and TTD488BE) diagnosed with seizure disorders, but only 3 out of the 31 other TTDpatients (p=0.024). Additionally, 4 patients from 3 families with TTDN1 defects had delayed bone age (TTD343BE, TTD480BE, and siblings TTD487BE and TTD488BE), as compared to 4 out of 23 TTDpatients with other mutations (p=0.009). These findings are consistent with earlier case reports (Table 1): seizure disorders were reported in two separate families with confirmed TTDN1 defects (Jackson et al. 1974; Przedborski et al. 1990), as was delayed bone age (Fois et al. 1988; Przedborski et al. 1990).Our TTDN1 patients had characteristic hair findings of tiger-tail banding and brittle, sulfur-deficient hair, recurrent infections, intellectual impairment, hypotonia, and osteopenia, as seen in TTD. However, other features consistent with TTD, including pregnancy complications, low birth weight, collodian membrane at birth, reduced height and weight, cataracts, thalassemia-like changes on blood work, and imaging findings of brain dysmyelination (Viprakasit et al. 2001; Kraemer et al. 2007; Faghri et al. 2008; Tamura et al. 2011; Brooks et al. 2011; DiGiovanna and Kraemer 2012) were underrepresented or absent. TTD is also associated with a strikingly sociable, outgoing, and friendly personality. In contrast, the 3 oldest TTDN1 patients within our cohort (TTD402BE, TTD343BE, and TTD480BE) displayed autistic features, including repetitive behaviors, obsessive interests, and difficulty socializing. Similar autistic features in TTDpatients with confirmed TTDN1 defects have been previously reported in case studies, reinforcing this genotype-phenotype correlation (Przedborski et al. 1990; Rizzo et al. 1992). Taken together, the overrepresentation of seizure disorders, delayed bone age, and autistic features in this subgroup, as well as the absence of other characteristic TTD features, represents a distinct phenotype and suggests a different mechanism of disease for patients with TTDN1 defects.Eight TTDN1 mutations were associated with a TTD phenotype in the literature (Table 1 and Figure 2). Seven of these mutations were deletions which involved a one or two base pairs, leading to a frame shift followed by a premature stop codon, or large deletions, preventing protein production. Most mutations were found in a single patient or family, however one cohort of 20 affected individuals of Amish background was reported with a common homozygous TTDN1 missense mutation (Jackson et al. 1974). DNA analysis of our cohort revealed large deletions in TTDN1 in 3 families leading to hemizygosity, a finding consistent with previous reports (Table 1 and Figure 2). These deletions would be expected to involve the adjacent (succinylCoA:glutarate-CoA transferase) gene on chromosome 7. Mutations in SUGCT have been reported to be associated with autosomal recessive glutaric aciduria type 3 (Sherman et al. 2008; Marlaire et al. 2014). However, our TTDN1 patients had deletions of only one SUGCT allele and the two patients tested had normal urinary organic acids. A single base pair deletion discovered in 1 family was also reported in two unrelated patients in the literature (Botta et al. 2007), indicating perhaps the location of a mutational hotspot. Other mutations in TTDN1 were found in 2 families; we report compound heterozygous missense mutations in the initiation codon in one family, and in the second, a single base pair deletion occurring near a previously reported mutation. The mutations uncovered in our cohort are expected to result in a null protein, which suggests that TTDN1 is not essential for life (Nakabayashi et al. 2005; Botta et al. 2007), in contrast to other TTD causing genes that are part of the basal transcription factor, TFIIH (XPB, XPD, and TTDA) (DiGiovanna and Kraemer 2012)..The identification of genotype-phenotype correlations in complex genetic diseases like TTD will allow clinicians to better predict the underlying genetic defect, providing more timely diagnosis and more specific prognostic information. This may be especially useful in patients for whom mutations could not be identified. For example, one previously reported TTDpatient described as having autism, mental retardation and seizures, was unable to be genotyped (Schepis et al. 1997). Based on additional findings of delayed bone age and normal laboratory blood values, our findings suggest that this patient may have had a defect in TTDN1. In the future, we seek to further clarify genotype-phenotype relationships for TTDpatients with XPD and TTDA mutations using the deep phenotyping methodology outlined in this study. With the information we collect, we also hope to identify features that may predict early mortality in these patients, identify causative mutations in patients with unknown defects, and further our understanding of disease pathogenesis in TTD.
Materials and Methods
Patients with features consistent with TTD were enrolled in an NCI Institutional Review Board approved DNA repair disease natural history protocol 99-C-0099, which adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki Protocols. Informed consent was obtained, following which patients underwent thorough skin exam, skin biopsy for fibroblast culture and blood draw for both diagnostic and research purposes. Diagnostic blood tests for each patient included Chem 20, hepatic, lipid, mineral, and iron panels, complete blood count with differential, immunoglobulin A, E, G, and M levels, hemoglobin electrophoresis, thyroid function tests, vitamin D and vitamin B12 levels, and additional tests according to medical need. Hair samples were also collected from each patient for examination under polarized light microscopy (Liang et al. 2005) and amino acid analysis (Liang et al. 2006). Further assessments included ophthalmology (Brooks et al. 2011), audiology, neurology, radiology, and others as medically indicated (Atkinson et al. 2014).Clinical documentation, imaging and laboratory results were collected and reviewed for all TTDpatients utilizing the NIH Clinical Center Biomedical Translational Research Information System (BTRIS), in addition to records obtained from outside facilities. We extracted more than 160 features to build a large clinical database using Microsoft Excel (Table S1). These features were used to compare patients with defects in TTDN1 to those with other mutations within our cohort. Statistical analysis included Fisher's exact tests. Two-sided p-values were used with a cutoff of p<0.05.
Clinical protocol, cells, and culture conditions
Skin biopsies were obtained and sent to the Human Genetic Mutant Cell Repository (Camden, NJ) or Fisher BioServices, NCI Frederick Central Repository (Frederick, MD) for establishment of fibroblast cell cultures. Fibroblast cultures from five TTD (TTD402BE, FXP0109; TTD480BE, FXP0416; TTD487BE, FXP0390; TTD488BE, FXP0388; TTD343BE, JA1451) and 1 XP-D (XP29BE, GM11613) patients, and normal control (FXP0223) were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) containing 4mM glutamine and 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) (Atlanta Biologicals) in an 8% CO2 humidified incubator at 37°C as described previously (Zhou et al. 2013).
Post-UV Cell survival
The measurement of cell viability 4 days after UVC exposure was carried out as described previously using a 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-4 (-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium (MTS) (Promega, Madison, WI) (Imoto et al. 2002).
PCR Amplification and Nucleotide Sequence Analysis
To identify the genetic changes, entire coding region of the TTDN1 (C7orf11) gene including splice donor and acceptor sites of exon 1 and exon 2 were polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplified. The primers were designed on the basis of GenBank reference sequences (accession nos. NC_000007 for genomic sequence and NM_138701 for mRNA sequence). TTDN1 cDNA sequences were followed with numbering based on base 1 as the A of the ATG initiation codon. The following forward and reverse primer sequences were used to amplify entire exon 1 and exon 2 regions of the TTDN1 gene: exon 1- 5’-CGAGGTTTTCGGCTTTGGCTC-3’, 5’-TCTCTAAGCCTCAGTTCGCTC-3’ (PCR fragment: 510 bp); exon 2 – 5’-ACTTTTAAGCAGCAATGTGATTCC-3’, 5’-GTATTGTTGGCTTATATCCACTAC-3’ (PCR fragment: 252 bp). The PCR amplification was achieved using primer pairs, Advantage GC genomic PCR Kit (Clontech Laboratories, Inc.) and patients’ DNA separated either from cells or blood. The PCR steps were conducted as follows: 94°C for 1 min, then 35 cycles of amplification (94°C for 20 s and 62°C for 2 min), ending with 62°C for 3 min. The PCR products were resolved on a 2% agarose gel. The PCR bands in the gel were visualized with EZ-Vision (Amresco) and UV light and photographed. After agarose gel purification the PCR product was subcloned into pCR2.1-TOPO vector (TOPO TA cloning kit; Invitrogen) as per the vendor's protocol in order to separate both mutant alleles. Mutations were confirmed by nucleotide sequencing. PCR was used to map the homozygous large deletion in genomic DNA from patient TTD343BE. The forward primer (5’- TTTTGGTAAAGGACTA - 3’) in C7orf11 gene and the reverse primer (5’- ATTCACCAAAACTAAT - 3’) in GRCh38 Primary Assembly Sequence ID: NC_000007.14 that flanks the deletion gives a 441 bp PCR product using Advantage GC genomic PCR Kit. The PCR steps were 94°C for 1 min, then 35 cycles of amplification (94°C for 20 s and 52°C for 2 min), ending with 52°C for 3 min. Sequencing of direct PCR or cloned PCR products was performed by cycle sequencing employing dideoxy termination chemistry and a Prism Model 3700 Capillary Array Sequencer using PCR primers as described (Zhou et al. 2013). An aCGH was performed by the National Cancer Institute Clinical Molecular Profiling Core using a custom designed high density DNA repair gene array as previously described (Tan et al. 2013).
Authors: Brian P Brooks; Amy H Thompson; Janine A Clayton; Chi-Chao Chan; Deborah Tamura; Wadih M Zein; Delphine Blain; Casey Hadsall; John Rowan; Kristen E Bowles; Sikandar G Khan; Takahiro Ueda; Jennifer Boyle; Kyu-Seon Oh; John J DiGiovanna; Kenneth H Kraemer Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2011-09-28 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Mary Regina Boland; George Hripcsak; Yufeng Shen; Wendy K Chung; Chunhua Weng Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2013-09-03 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Xiaohui Tan; Sarah L Anzick; Sikandar G Khan; Takahiro Ueda; Gary Stone; John J Digiovanna; Deborah Tamura; Daniel Wattendorf; David Busch; Carmen C Brewer; Christopher Zalewski; John A Butman; Andrew J Griffith; Paul S Meltzer; Kenneth H Kraemer Journal: Hum Mutat Date: 2013-06-03 Impact factor: 4.878
Authors: Xiaolong Zhou; Sikandar G Khan; Deborah Tamura; Nicholas J Patronas; Wadih M Zein; Brian P Brooks; Kenneth H Kraemer; John J DiGiovanna Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Arjan F Theil; Elena Botta; Anja Raams; Desiree E C Smith; Marisa I Mendes; Giuseppina Caligiuri; Sarah Giachetti; Silvia Bione; Roberta Carriero; Giordano Liberi; Luca Zardoni; Sigrid M A Swagemakers; Gajja S Salomons; Alain Sarasin; Alan Lehmann; Peter J van der Spek; Tomoo Ogi; Jan H J Hoeijmakers; Wim Vermeulen; Donata Orioli Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Emily L Casanova; Julia L Sharp; Hrishikesh Chakraborty; Nahid Sultana Sumi; Manuel F Casanova Journal: Mol Autism Date: 2016-03-15 Impact factor: 7.509
Authors: Nicole J Van Bergen; Sean Massey; Anita Quigley; Ben Rollo; Alexander R Harris; Robert M I Kapsa; John Christodoulou Journal: Biochem Soc Trans Date: 2022-08-31 Impact factor: 4.919
Authors: Christiane Kuschal; Elena Botta; Donata Orioli; John J Digiovanna; Sara Seneca; Kathelijn Keymolen; Deborah Tamura; Elizabeth Heller; Sikandar G Khan; Giuseppina Caligiuri; Manuela Lanzafame; Tiziana Nardo; Roberta Ricotti; Fiorenzo A Peverali; Robert Stephens; Yongmei Zhao; Alan R Lehmann; Laura Baranello; David Levens; Kenneth H Kraemer; Miria Stefanini Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2016-03-17 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Khadim Shah; Raja Hussain Ali; Muhammad Ansar; Kwanghyuk Lee; Muhammad Salman Chishti; Izoduwa Abbe; Biao Li; Joshua D Smith; Deborah A Nickerson; Jay Shendure; Paul J Coucke; Wouter Steyaert; Michael J Bamshad; Regie Lyn P Santos-Cortez; Suzanne M Leal; Wasim Ahmad Journal: BMC Med Genet Date: 2016-02-16 Impact factor: 2.103
Authors: Arjan F Theil; Imke K Mandemaker; Emile van den Akker; Sigrid M A Swagemakers; Anja Raams; Tatjana Wüst; Jurgen A Marteijn; Jacques C Giltay; Richard M Colombijn; Ute Moog; Urania Kotzaeridou; Mehrnaz Ghazvini; Marieke von Lindern; Jan H J Hoeijmakers; Nicolaas G J Jaspers; Peter J van der Spek; Wim Vermeulen Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Taran Khanam; Ivan Muñoz; Florian Weiland; Thomas Carroll; Michael Morgan; Barbara N Borsos; Vasiliki Pantazi; Meghan Slean; Miroslav Novak; Rachel Toth; Paul Appleton; Tibor Pankotai; Houjiang Zhou; John Rouse Journal: EMBO J Date: 2021-10-04 Impact factor: 11.598