Literature DB >> 25290634

Documentation of sexual partner gender is low in electronic health records: observations, predictors, and recommendations to improve population health management in primary care.

Giang T Nguyen1,2,3,4,5, Baligh R Yehia2,3,4,5,6.   

Abstract

The 2011 Institute of Medicine report on LGBT health recommended that sexual orientation and gender identity (SO/GI) be documented in electronic health records (EHRs). Most EHRs cannot document all aspects of SO/GI, but some can record gender of sexual partners. This study sought to determine the proportion of patients who have the gender of sexual partners recorded in the EHR and to identify factors associated with documentation. A retrospective analysis was done of EHR data for 40 family medicine (FM) and general internal medicine (IM) practices, comprising 170,570 adult patients seen in 2012. The primary outcome was EHR documentation of sexual partner gender. Multivariate logistic regression assessed the impact of patient, provider, and practice factors on documentation. In all, 76,767 patients (45%) had the gender of sexual partners recorded, 4.3% of whom had same-gender partners (3.5% of females, 5.6% of males). Likelihood of documentation was independently higher for women; blacks; those with a preventive visit; those with a physician assistant, nurse practitioner, or resident primary care provider (vs. attending); those at urban practices; those at smaller practices; and those at a residency FM practice. Older age and Medicare insurance were associated with lower documentation. Sexual partner gender documentation is important to identify patients for targeted prevention and support, and holds great potential for population health management, yet documentation in the EHR currently is low. Primary care practices should routinely record the gender of sexual partners, and additional work is needed to identify best practices for collecting and using SO/GI data in this setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25290634      PMCID: PMC4532942          DOI: 10.1089/pop.2014.0075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Popul Health Manag        ISSN: 1942-7891            Impact factor:   2.459


  24 in total

1.  Views of health professionals on discussing sexual issues with patients.

Authors:  N H J Haboubi; N Lincoln
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2003-03-18       Impact factor: 3.033

2.  Direct observation of rates of preventive service delivery in community family practice.

Authors:  K C Stange; S A Flocke; M A Goodwin; R B Kelly; S J Zyzanski
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Receipt of preventive health care services by lesbians.

Authors:  A L Diamant; M A Schuster; J Lever
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 4.  The clinician's perspective on electronic health records and how they can affect patient care.

Authors:  Stephen H Walsh
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-05-15

5.  Primary care outcomes in patients treated by nurse practitioners or physicians: two-year follow-up.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Lenz; Mary O'Neil Mundinger; Robert L Kane; Sarah C Hopkins; Susan X Lin
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.929

6.  Do homosexual persons use health care services more frequently than heterosexual persons: findings from a Dutch population survey.

Authors:  Floor C Bakker; Theo G M Sandfort; Ine Vanwesenbeeck; Hanneke van Lindert; Gert P Westert
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2006-07-03       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Care activities and outcomes of patients cared for by acute care nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and resident physicians: a comparison.

Authors:  E B Rudy; L J Davidson; B Daly; J M Clochesy; S Sereika; M Baldisseri; M Hravnak; T Ross; C Ryan
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.228

8.  Barriers to seeking treatment for sexual problems in primary care: a qualitative study with older people.

Authors:  Merryn Gott; Sharron Hinchliff
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.267

9.  "Opening a can of worms": GP and practice nurse barriers to talking about sexual health in primary care.

Authors:  Merryn Gott; Elisabeth Galena; Sharron Hinchliff; Helen Elford
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.267

10.  General practitioner attitudes to discussing sexual health issues with older people.

Authors:  Merryn Gott; Sharron Hinchliff; Elisabeth Galena
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.634

View more
  4 in total

1.  Transforming Primary Care for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender People: A Collaborative Quality Improvement Initiative.

Authors:  Bruce W Furness; Hilary Goldhammer; Wanda Montalvo; Kelly Gagnon; Lauren Bifulco; Daniel Lentine; Daren Anderson
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 2.  The use of Electronic Health Records to Support Population Health: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Clemens Scott Kruse; Anna Stein; Heather Thomas; Harmander Kaur
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  Variation in Sexual Orientation Documentation in a National Electronic Health Record System.

Authors:  Kristine E Lynch; Benjamin Viernes; Karen C Schliep; Elise Gatsby; Patrick R Alba; Scott L DuVall; John R Blosnich
Journal:  LGBT Health       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 5.150

Review 4.  A rapid review of gender, sex, and sexual orientation documentation in electronic health records.

Authors:  Francis Lau; Marcy Antonio; Kelly Davison; Roz Queen; Aaron Devor
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 4.497

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.