Mayienne Bakkers1, Catharina G Faber1, Jos P H Reulen2, Janneke G J Hoeijmakers1, Els K Vanhoutte1, Ingemar S J Merkies3. 1. Department of Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Neurology, Spaarne Hospital, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: We examined optimization of a temperature threshold testing (TTT) protocol for patients with suspected small-fiber neuropathy (SFN) to lessen the burden for both patients and technicians, without sacrificing accuracy. METHODS: Data from 81 patients with SFN (skin biopsy and TTT abnormal) and 81 without SFN (skin biopsy and TTT normal) were used. Warm, cold, and heat pain sensation thresholds were determined bilaterally on the thenar eminence and foot dorsum by methods of limits and levels. Diagnostic accuracy was determined for various sensory modality combinations through comparative corresponding area under the receiver-operator characteristic curves. RESULTS: Assessment of warm and cold thresholds in all extremities by the method of levels showed the best discriminatory ability (area under the curve 0.95, sensitivity 84.2%, specificity 93.8%). CONCLUSIONS: These assessments are suggested for TTT examination in possible SFN patients. By applying this combination, the time needed for TTT can be reduced, maintaining diagnostic accuracy.
INTRODUCTION: We examined optimization of a temperature threshold testing (TTT) protocol for patients with suspected small-fiber neuropathy (SFN) to lessen the burden for both patients and technicians, without sacrificing accuracy. METHODS: Data from 81 patients with SFN (skin biopsy and TTT abnormal) and 81 without SFN (skin biopsy and TTT normal) were used. Warm, cold, and heat pain sensation thresholds were determined bilaterally on the thenar eminence and foot dorsum by methods of limits and levels. Diagnostic accuracy was determined for various sensory modality combinations through comparative corresponding area under the receiver-operator characteristic curves. RESULTS: Assessment of warm and cold thresholds in all extremities by the method of levels showed the best discriminatory ability (area under the curve 0.95, sensitivity 84.2%, specificity 93.8%). CONCLUSIONS: These assessments are suggested for TTT examination in possible SFNpatients. By applying this combination, the time needed for TTT can be reduced, maintaining diagnostic accuracy.
Authors: Bianca T A de Greef; Janneke G J Hoeijmakers; Emma E Wolters; Hubertus J M Smeets; Arthur van den Wijngaard; Ingemar S J Merkies; Catharina G Faber; Monique M Gerrits Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-02-11 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: B T A de Greef; J G J Hoeijmakers; C M L Gorissen-Brouwers; M Geerts; C G Faber; I S J Merkies Journal: Eur J Neurol Date: 2017-12-18 Impact factor: 6.089