Literature DB >> 25290092

Seasonal variation in the month of birth in patients with skin cancer.

F La Rosa1, A Liso2, F Bianconi1, E Duca3, F Stracci1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Month of birth influences the risk of developing several diseases. We investigated the influence of date of birth on melanoma skin cancer (MSC) and non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) incidence.
METHODS: Enhanced cancer registry data were analysed including 1751 MSC and 15 200 NMSC.
RESULTS: People born in February to April showed significantly elevated risks of NMSC compared with those born in summertime.
CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated seasonality by date of birth for skin cancer incidence. Neonatal UV exposure may explain this finding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25290092      PMCID: PMC4453742          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2014.522

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


Date of birth has been associated with health outcomes, including multiple sclerosis, autism, schizophrenia, and life expectancy (Davies ; Zerbo ; Dobson ; Ueda ). The seasonality of birth and cancer risk was reported among teenagers and young adults for haematological or brain cancers and, in adults, for breast or central nervous system cancers (Yuen ; Kristoffersen and Hartveit, 2000; Koch ; Schmidt ; Staykov ; Parodi ; Van Laar ; Crump ) The reason for the association remains unclear. However, seasonal variation of exposure to environmental factors has been often proposed to explain the observed risk patterns (Currie and Schwandt, 2013). In the Umbria region of Italy, non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is the most frequent cancer site. The standardized skin cancer incidence rates were increasing in the study period (1994–2010; Data are available at http://www.rtup.unipg.it/). Similar trends were reported for many western countries (Erdmann ; Nikolaou and Stratigos, 2014). Explanations proposed for the observed trend include increased exposure to risk factors (for example, sun exposure) and increasing skin examination for the early diagnosis of melanoma (Bataille and de Vries, 2008). Seasonal effects can contribute to define the role of risk factor exposures in determining actual incidence patterns and trends. The goal of this paper is to investigate the influence of date of birth on skin cancer incidence.

Materials and methods

The Umbrian Cancer Registry (RTUP) covers all residents of Umbria, Italy (that is, ∼900 000 inhabitants). Cases were collected in accordance with standard methods for cancer registries. RTUP is a member of the International Association of Cancer Registries and contributor of the international publication of incidence data (Forman ). RTUP has a high data quality standard. Very low percentages of incomplete cases known only from causes of death certification are achieved through extensive search in the data sources and trace-back including search of information by family physicians. Cancer type and site were coded using the ICD10 (WHO, 1992). Cancer registry data were managed according to Italian laws and rules for cancer registries. We performed an additional search for cases among all regional dermatologists and dermatopathologists to ensure completeness. The information system of the Umbria Cancer Registry (S.G.RTUP) was used for data management (Bianconi ). The incidence rate was calculated per 100 000 residents per year. Because of the relatively small number of cases, the incidence of melanoma was examined for both sexes on the whole. The statistical evaluation of seasonality on monthly data, adjusted for varying population at risk, was carried out by the Walter and Elwood test (Walter and Elwood, 1975). The χ2 test was used to compare distributions by gender. To investigate the association between incidence and diagnosis or birth month, we used negative binomial regression. Nested models were compared using the likelihood ratio test. A spline was used to describe the correlation between birth and skin cancer incidence. We used weekly data to obtain a better approximation of the function to the observed risks (Royston and Sauerbrei, 2007). All tests were two-sided and results with P<0.05 were considered significant.

Results

In the study period, 1745 cases of melanoma (50% females) and 15 992 of carcinoma (41% females, 66% basal-cell cancers) were registered. The NMSC monthly distribution of incidence showed a clear seasonality (see Supplementary Figure 1). The risk shape for melanoma skin cancer (MSC) cases was similar to NMSC with the exception of the high incidence rate for those born in June. Seasonal trends were statically significant for NMSC (see Supplementary Table 1) and nonsignificant for MSC patients (P=0.09). The monthly distribution by gender for NMSC patients was not statistically different (χ2 P=0.4). We fitted separate negative binomial regression models by cancer type (that is, melanoma of the skin, NMSCs) for the month of birth (Table 1). This allows inspection and comparison of relative risks without constraint on seasonal pattern. NMSC was also divided into basal cell- and squamous-cell cancers, and separate analyses were performed for these morphologies (see Supplementary Materials). Monthly distribution by skin cancer type was not significantly different.
Table 1

Negative binomial regression models for NMSC and MSC cancers by month of birth

 NMSC (C44)
MSC (C43)
VariableIRR95% CIPIRR95% CIP
Months
January1.181.091.28<0.0011.411.121.770.003
February1.291.191.39<0.0011.150.901.470.25
March1.301.201.40<0.0011.361.091.710.007
April1.311.211.41<0.0011.150.901.450.26
May1.141.051.230.0021.150.901.460.26
June1.020.931.110.701.411.111.770.004
JulyaRef.   Ref.   
August1.040.961.130.321.120.881.430.36
September1.091.001.180.041.140.901.460.28
October1.081.001.170.061.100.861.400.45
November1.201.111.31<0.0011.120.871.430.37
December1.111.021.210.010.930.721.210.61
Gender
MalesRef.   Ref.   
Females0.660.640.68<0.0010.950.861.040.25

Abbreviations: CI=confidence interval; IRR=incidence rate ratio; MSC=melanoma skin cancer; NMSC=non-melanoma skin cancer; Ref.=reference category.

reference category is the month with the lowest date of birth.

A flexible model (that is, restricted cubic spline) was fitted to further illustrate skin cancer risk as a continuous function of date of birth (Figure 1). A single spline was used for MSC and NMSC, assuming a common underling risk function. Observed MSC and NMSC rates were plotted together with splines to provide a visual comparison of the continuous risk function to observed data. The curve gave evidence of a clear excess risk for people born in the first months of the year. Indeed the curves for melanoma, squamous cell, and basal cell cancers were very similar (Figure 2). The curve for melanoma was not significant and was shown only to illustrate the marked similarity with the other skin cancer morphologies.
Figure 1

Weekly skin cancer risk. Curves represent skin cancer risk adjusted by gender, site and population at risk (dashed lines 95% confidence interval). Bars are MSC (solid) and NMSC (hollow) crude incidence rates.

Figure 2

Weekly skin cancer risk by morphology (top: Basal cells cancer, middle: squamous cells cancer and bottom: melanoma).

Discussion

We observed a strong seasonal effect of the date of birth that influenced incidence of skin cancers. Our study is based on a homogeneous population that has been remarkably stable for decades and, thereby, has a common genetic background and widespread social habits. Two studies demonstrated the influence of birth date on MSC risk (Basta , Crump ) and none is available for NMSC. In our study, the influence of month of birth was clear for NMSC and was borderline nonsignificant for MSC cancer. However, the MSC incidence pattern did not differ significantly from that of NMSC so that we can assume and discuss a common risk shape. A recent cohort study found evidence of high risk of adult MSC for persons born during spring (Crump ). We observed highest risks for people born in March–April as in the study by Crump et al. The small difference in the curves shape depends on the use of a less-flexible model (that is, sinusoidal logistic regression) in the study by Crump et al. The curves by morphology showed a marked similarity. However, squamous-cell cancer has been linked with a different UV exposure pattern with respect to basal-cell skin cancer and melanoma (English ). Our result is compatible with a role of very early exposures in determining an increased susceptibility to all skin cancers. Subsequent UV exposures influence the development of MSC, basal cell, or squamous cell cancers. The seasonal pattern for NMSC could be explained with UV exposure in utero or in the first months of life. Several authors have examined the influence of UV exposure both on human lifespan and on the frequency of diseases such as diabetes, multiple sclerosis, and so on (Menni ; Davis and Lowell, 2013). Lowell and Davis (2010) wrote that ‘the hypothesis that specific wavelengths of UVR, experienced at critical times in development as at conception or early gestation, and with specific intensity or rate of change, modulates the expression of human diseases'. In addition, very early-life UV exposure could increase the risk of skin cancer occurrence many years later, if we assume that direct sun exposure in summertime is avoided in newborns (0–3 months) and that children 4–6 months old are exposed more than younger ones. Indeed, the study by Stanton ) gave evidence of increasing sun exposure with age, comparing infants (that is, <1 year of age) with toddlers (2- to 4-year-old children). UV skin exposure is widely accepted to be a risk factor for MSC and NMSC (D'Orazio ) and early exposure has been associated with incidence of melanoma in the young (Basta ). Neonatal skin is immature and still developing through the first year of life (Nikolovski ). Biological mechanisms have been proposed to explain the relationship between neonatal UV exposure and adult cancer risk. Exposures of the immature skin occurring in the first weeks after birth tend to induce tolerance and have a lasting influence on the immune system in mice (McGee ). Other possible explanations include in utero or early exposures to nutritional, infective, or environmental factors other than UV. Vitamin D levels depend on both dietary intake and UV exposure and have been proposed as an explanation for the association between season of birth and risk of adult disease (Bersani ; Crump ). Skin cancers pose a problem of completeness to cancer registries. Surgical treatment can be performed without hospitalisation, and histological verification can be carried out by a dermatopathologist, thereby not resulting in any cancer registry data sources (Cockburn ). Many cancer registries do not collect NMSC data at all because additional data sources are needed to ensure completeness of registration (Lomas ). We performed an additional active search for cases among all regional dermatologists and regularly acquire archives from dermatopathologists to avoid incompleteness of registration. In conclusion, our study provides evidence of a seasonal influence of month of birth on skin cancer incidence. UV exposure of the neonatal skin or in utero may increase susceptibility to both MSC and NMSC during adulthood. Therefore, studies to further (Stanton ) characterise the pattern of sun exposure during pregnancy and in the first months of life would be important in order to investigate the possible role of UV exposure on the risk of skin cancer in adulthood.
  30 in total

1.  The effect of solar cycles on human lifespan in the 50 United states: variation in light affects the human genome.

Authors:  Walter E Lowell; George E Davis
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 1.538

2.  Seasonal variation in the month of birth in teenagers and young adults with melanoma suggests the involvement of early-life UV exposure.

Authors:  Nermine O Basta; Peter W James; Alan W Craft; Richard J Q McNally
Journal:  Pigment Cell Melanoma Res       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 4.693

3.  Season of birth and other perinatal risk factors for melanoma.

Authors:  Casey Crump; Kristina Sundquist; Weiva Sieh; Marilyn A Winkleby; Jan Sundquist
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 7.196

4.  Season of birth and risk of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  Casey Crump; Jan Sundquist; Weiva Sieh; Marilyn A Winkleby; Kristina Sundquist
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 5.  A systematic review of worldwide incidence of nonmelanoma skin cancer.

Authors:  A Lomas; J Leonardi-Bee; F Bath-Hextall
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 9.302

6.  Barrier function and water-holding and transport properties of infant stratum corneum are different from adult and continue to develop through the first year of life.

Authors:  Janeta Nikolovski; Georgios N Stamatas; Nikiforos Kollias; Benjamin C Wiegand
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2008-01-17       Impact factor: 8.551

7.  Birth month and risk of glioma in adults: a registry-based study in Bavaria.

Authors:  Dimitre Staykov; Martin Radespiel-Tröger; Martin Meyer; Sabrina Petsch; Stefan Schwab; René Handschu
Journal:  Chronobiol Int       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.877

Review 8.  The month of birth effect in multiple sclerosis: systematic review, meta-analysis and effect of latitude.

Authors:  Ruth Dobson; Gavin Giovannoni; Sreeram Ramagopalan
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 10.154

9.  Variation in ultraviolet radiation and diabetes: evidence of an epigenetic effect that modulates diabetics' lifespan.

Authors:  George E Davis; Walter E Lowell
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 6.551

Review 10.  UV radiation and the skin.

Authors:  John D'Orazio; Stuart Jarrett; Alexandra Amaro-Ortiz; Timothy Scott
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 5.923

View more
  6 in total

1.  Seasonal variation in diagnosis of invasive cutaneous melanoma in Eastern England and Scotland.

Authors:  Fiona M Walter; Gary A Abel; Georgios Lyratzopoulos; Jane Melia; David Greenberg; David H Brewster; Helen Butler; Pippa G Corrie; Christine Campbell
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 2.984

2.  Is Month of Birth a Risk Factor for Colorectal Cancer?

Authors:  N K Francis; N J Curtis; E Noble; M Cortina-Borja; E Salib
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 2.260

3.  Birth month and risk of skin tumors-Follow up of six million Caucasians born from 1950 to 2014 in Sweden.

Authors:  Rickard Ljung; Mats Talbäck; Amal R Khanolkar; Maria Feychting
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 4.452

4.  Effect of Time (Season, Surgical Starting Time, Waiting Time) on Patients with Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Dong Peng; Ying-Ying Zou; Yu-Xi Cheng; Wei Tao; Wei Zhang
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2021-03-29

5.  Seasonal Variation in Skin Cancer Diagnosis.

Authors:  Fortunato Bianconi; Giuseppe M Masanotti; Arcangelo Liso; Francesco La Rosa; Emilio Duca; Fabrizio Stracci
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2016-04-28

6.  Multifactorial analysis of the stochastic epigenetic variability in cord blood confirmed an impact of common behavioral and environmental factors but not of in vitro conception.

Authors:  D Gentilini; E Somigliana; L Pagliardini; E Rabellotti; P Garagnani; L Bernardinelli; E Papaleo; M Candiani; A M Di Blasio; P Viganò
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 6.551

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.