Literature DB >> 25290037

Do different circadian typology measures modulate their relationship with personality? A test using the Alternative Five Factor Model.

Christoph Randler1, Montserrat Gomà-i-Freixanet, Anna Muro, Christina Knauber, Ana Adan.   

Abstract

The relationship between personality and circadian typology shows some inconsistent results and it has been hypothesized that the model used to measure personality might have a moderating effect on this relationship. However, it has never been explored if this inconsistency was dependent on the questionnaire used to measure differences in circadian rhythms as well. We explored this issue in a sample of 564 university students (32% men; 19-40 years) using the Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire, which is based on an evolutionary-biological approach, in combination with the Composite Scale of Morningness (CSM) and the reduced Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (rMEQ). Both questionnaires detected differences between circadian typologies in Sociability (highest in evening types; ET) and Impulsive Sensation-Seeking scales (highest in ET), while the CSM also detected differences in Activity (lowest in ET) and Aggression-Hostility (highest in ET). Further, both questionnaires detected differences between circadian typologies in the subscales General Activity (morning types [MT] higher than ET), Impulsivity (ET highest) and Sensation-Seeking (highest in ET). Differences between circadian typologies/groups in the subscales Parties (highest in ET) and Isolation Intolerance (lowest in MT) were only detected by the rMEQ. The CSM clearly separated evening types from neither and morning types while the rMEQ showed that neither types are not intermediate but closer to evening types in General Activity and Isolation Intolerance, and closer to morning types in Impulsive Sensation-Seeking, Parties, Impulsivity and Sensation Seeking. The obtained results indicate that the relationship between circadian typology and personality may be dependent on the instrument used to assess circadian typology. This fact may help to explain some of the conflicting data available on the relationship between these two concepts.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Circadian typology; ZKPQ; composite scale of morningness; personality; reduced morningness-eveningness questionnaire; sex

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25290037     DOI: 10.3109/07420528.2014.968282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chronobiol Int        ISSN: 0742-0528            Impact factor:   2.877


  5 in total

1.  Constraint is associated with earlier circadian phase and morningness: Confirmation of relationships between personality and circadian phase using a constant routine protocol.

Authors:  B Bullock; G Murray; J L Anderson; T Cooper-O'Neill; J J Gooley; S W Cain; S W Lockley
Journal:  Pers Individ Dif       Date:  2016-07-31

2.  Validation of the Italian Version of the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire for Adolescents by A. Lancry and Th. Arbault.

Authors:  Guido Maria Cavallera; Giuseppe Boari
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2015-09-10

3.  SARS-CoV2 (COVID-19) Pandemic Lockdown Influences Nature-Based Recreational Activity: The Case of Birders.

Authors:  Christoph Randler; Piotr Tryjanowski; Jukka Jokimäki; Marja-Liisa Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki; Naomi Staller
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Young adults' perspective of global environmental risks: A study on Polish university students.

Authors:  Błażej Przybylski; Emilia Janeczko; Marcin Studnicki; Ernest Bielinis; Lidia Bielinis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Personality and affections in university students: implications of circadian typology.

Authors:  Giovanna de Almeida Santos; Juliana Oliveira Moreira; Ana Maria Mazon Araujo; Gabriela Correia Teixeira; Nicolle Helena Carvalho Vaz; Júlia Gabriela Antunes Fonseca; Michael J O Andrade
Journal:  Sleep Sci       Date:  2022 Jul-Sep
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.