Literature DB >> 25289299

Mirror, mirror on the wall, which breast is bigger of them all.

Gal Moreira Dini1, Ricardo Gozzano1, Roberta Barros Ferreira1, Matthaeus Faria1, Mario Farinazzo1, Lydia Masako Ferreira1.   

Abstract

SUMMARY: Symmetry is a topic of utmost importance when interviewing a patient who comes asking for cosmetic surgery. We must warn that asymmetry is "the normal." There is no perfect symmetry in the human body, and this overstated search can be sign of psychological and psychiatric disorders. Sometimes multiple procedures are needed to improve a breast's symmetry and appearance. To give an extra intraoperative view, the authors have developed a new instrument to be used during the mammoplasty (reduction or augmentation) surgery.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 25289299      PMCID: PMC4173825          DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open        ISSN: 2169-7574


Aesthetically pleasing and symmetrical breasts are the one of the goals of any breast surgery. According to published data, which represented 60% of American physicians, there was a larger absolute number of malpractice claims arising from the operating room when compared with the emergency room.[1] Most malpractice claims in cosmetic plastic surgery are not consequences of technical faults but because of inadequate patient selection criteria and lack of adequate communication between patient and surgeon.[2] Despite differences among studies, the prevalence of body dysmorphic disorder ranges between 7% and 24% in patients seeking plastic surgery. It is characterized by an excessive preoccupation with an imagined or slight defect which takes huge proportions for affected patients.[3,4] The search for perfect symmetry is a utopia and delirium from patients psychologically unstable who focus their life in slight body asymmetries. This demand forces the surgeon to seek additional methods to give the patient the “best possible symmetry.” To date, breast assessment has been conducted mainly subjectively, but a validated objective 3-dimensional imaging was developed.[5] During the surgery, the surgeon cannot use this technology but has “to see” these 3-dimensions (the breasts symmetry in height, width, and depth). He or she also must take into account measurements between the positions and shape the areolas and the inverted “T” scars. We propose a new instrument that allows the surgeon to have a cranial view of the operated breasts, and so they can count on this additional point of view (the view that the patient will have when looking down). It is composed of a metallic arc to be fixed on the rail, which is attached the surgical table clamps (Fig. 1). On the middle of this arc, there is another lock that latches a flexible vertical metallic bar which enables the mirror to be placed in different heights and angles (Fig. 2). The bench top mirror (bought in regular bathroom products store) measured 24 cm (9.5") of wide by 10 cm (4") in height. These measurements proved to be optimal for viewing all the cranial and medial quadrants of the breasts (Fig. 3).
Fig. 1.

Metallic arc to be fixed on the rail attached the surgical table clamps.

Fig. 2.

Flexible vertical metallic bar which enables the mirror to be placed in different heights and angles.

Fig. 3.

The mirror in use in the intraoperative time.

Metallic arc to be fixed on the rail attached the surgical table clamps. Flexible vertical metallic bar which enables the mirror to be placed in different heights and angles. The mirror in use in the intraoperative time. Symmetry is a topic of utmost importance when interviewing a patient who comes asking for cosmetic surgery. We must warn that asymmetry is “the normal.” There is no perfect symmetry in the human body, and this overstated search can be sign of psychological and psychiatric disorders. Counseling in preoperative (and also in the postoperative time) is of extreme value once the discerning eye has repeatedly been demonstrated to be able to detect smaller asymmetries.[6] Sometimes multiple procedures are needed to improve a breast’s symmetry and appearance. To give an extra intraoperative view, the authors have developed a new instrument to be used during the mammoplasty (reduction or augmentation) surgery.
  6 in total

1.  Subjective versus objective assessment of breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Helga Henseler; Joanna Smith; Adrian Bowman; Balvinder S Khambay; Xiangyang Ju; Ashraf Ayoub; Arup K Ray
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2013-02-09       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  A reduction mammaplasty with legal implications.

Authors:  S Hoffman; A L Schiavetti
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 1.539

Review 3.  Medical litigation in cosmetic plastic surgery.

Authors:  Anna Mavroforou; Athanasios Giannoukas; Emmanuel Michalodimitrakis
Journal:  Med Law       Date:  2004

4.  Is the umbilicus truly midline? Clinical and medicolegal implications.

Authors:  Rod J Rohrich; Evan S Sorokin; Spencer A Brown; Diane L Gibby
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Support system for decision making in the identification of risk for body dysmorphic disorder: a fuzzy model.

Authors:  Maria José Azevedo de Brito; Fábio Xerfan Nahas; Neli Regina Siqueira Ortega; Táki Athanássios Cordás; Gal Moreira Dini; Miguel Sabino Neto; Lydia Masako Ferreira
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 4.046

6.  Lawsuits against plastic surgeons: Does locale affect incidence of claims?

Authors:  Jonathan L Kaplan; Warren C Hammert; James E Zin
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2007
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.