Literature DB >> 25289253

Serratus branch as recipient vessel for microvascular tissue transfer in breast reconstruction.

Erin M Taylor1, Lauren M Patrick1, Maurice Y Nahabedian1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 25289253      PMCID: PMC4174060          DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0b013e3182aa8723

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open        ISSN: 2169-7574


× No keyword cloud information.
Although the internal mammary vessels remain the recipient vessels of choice in free flap breast reconstruction, the thoracodorsal vessels are still chosen for a variety of reasons. The use of the internal mammary artery as a recipient vessel is justified despite concern for future coronary revascularization.[1] The thoracodorsal vessels continue to be used because of surgeon preference and cases of suboptimal internal mammary vessels upon dissection. The potential disadvantages of the thoracodorsal artery and vein as recipient vessels include difficultly in achieving medial fullness in the final breast mound and the inability to use the latissimus flap for future breast reconstruction. We present a case in which the serratus branch is used as recipient vessels for microvascular tissue transfer, with the advantage of preserving the thoracodorsal vessels for future flap reconstruction. The patient is a 44-year-old woman with history of left breast cancer status post mastectomy, who presented for delayed autologous free flap reconstruction. After excision of the previous mastectomy scar, the prepectoral pocket was created. It was noted that the previous mastectomy scar went quite lateral, and therefore, the decision was made to dissect the thoracodorsal vessels. During the dissection, the serratus branch of the thoracodorsal vessels was noted to be quite large and suitable for microvascular anastomosis (Fig. 1). We chose to use the serratus branch as recipient vessels to spare the thoracodorsal vessels. This would allow for future use of her latissimus muscle for breast or general reconstruction.
Fig. 1.

Dissection of the thoracodorsal vessels. The serratus branch of the thoracodorsal vessels was found large and suitable for microvascular anastomosis.

Dissection of the thoracodorsal vessels. The serratus branch of the thoracodorsal vessels was found large and suitable for microvascular anastomosis. Few studies have described the use of the serratus branch as recipient vessels for microvascular transfer. Arnez et al[2] describe a case of a patient who underwent a free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap reconstruction with the serratus anterior branch as a recipient vessel, thus conserving the remainder of the thoracodorsal vessels in case they were needed in a secondary salvage surgery. In a study describing their experience with 50 free TRAM flap reconstructions, Arnez et al[3] describe 1 of 2 reconstructions using the serratus branch, citing the superior back flow of the serratus branch in comparison with the flow of the proximal pedicle. Another group describes their use of the serratus branch as recipient vessels in 4 patients undergoing partial breast reconstruction with mini-superficial inferior epigastric artery and mini-deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps to achieve the proper anatomic placement of miniflaps.[4] Most cases describe the use of the serratus branch and other distal branches of the thoracodorsal artery as a means to successfully salvage a deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap through retrograde flow anastomosis.[5] In conclusion, the serratus branch of the thoracodorsal vessels provides a viable recipient site for microvascular tissue transfer with the advantages of sparing the thoracodorsal vessels for future latissimus flap reconstruction.

DISCLOSURE

The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article. The Article Processing Charge was paid for by the authors.
  5 in total

1.  Salvage of a DIEP flap using a retrograde flow anastomosis.

Authors:  Robert H Caulfield; Atoussa Maleki-Tabrizi; Bhagwat Mathur; Venkat Ramakrishnan
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Breast reconstruction by the free lower transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap.

Authors:  Z M Arnez; R W Smith; E Eder; M Solinc; M Kersnic
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  1988-09

3.  Partial breast reconstruction with mini superficial inferior epigastric artery and mini deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps.

Authors:  Aldona J Spiegel; Liron Eldor
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.539

4.  The internal mammary artery and vein as recipient vessels for microvascular breast reconstruction: are we burning a future bridge?

Authors:  Maurice Y Nahabedian
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.539

5.  Experience with 50 free TRAM flap breast reconstructions.

Authors:  Z M Arnez; J Bajec; A F Bardsley; T Scamp; M H Webster
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.730

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.