| Literature DB >> 25289090 |
Ying Zhu1, Changfei Mao1, Jianzhong Wu2, Shuchun Li3, Rong Ma2, Haixia Cao2, Minghua Ji4, Changwen Jing2, Jinhai Tang5.
Abstract
It has previously been reported that KU60019, as a highly effective radiosensitizer, inhibits the DNA damage response and blocks radiation-induced phosphorylation of key ataxia telangiectasia mutated targets in human glioma cells. The present study investigated whether KU60019 affects cell physiological activities and strengthens the efficacy of doxorubicin-induced DNA damage. It was demonstrated that the compound suppressed the proliferation of MCF-7 cells and significantly increased chemosensitization. In addition, KU60019 (without doxorubicin) inhibited MCF-7 cell motility and invasion, potentially by acting on the phosphorylated-Akt and E-cadherin signaling pathways. Although the majority of MCF-7 cells were arrested at the G1/S phase following treatment with KU60019, the combination of the two compounds did not result in such a marked effect on the cell cycle. In conclusion, KU60019 is a potent chemosensitizer in combination with doxorubicin, therefore, it may provide a promising strategy for non-invasive breast cancer.Entities:
Keywords: KU60019; ataxia telangiectasia mutated; chemosensitivity; doxorubicin; p-p53 (Ser15)
Year: 2014 PMID: 25289090 PMCID: PMC4186532 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2014.2444
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncol Lett ISSN: 1792-1074 Impact factor: 2.967
Figure 1Survival rates of MCF-7 cells treated with different concentrations of (A) KU60019 and (B) doxorubicin for 24 h were tested using a Cell Counting Kit-8 assay. DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide.
Figure 2Apoptotic rate of MCF-7 cells induced by different compounds. (A,B and D) No marked difference was identified among the cells treated with KU60019 at a concentration of 3 μM and the control groups. (C) At a concentration of 0.25 mg/l, Dox induced 9.6±0.83% cell apoptosis. (E) Combining the two inhibitors significantly increased the chemosensitization of MCF-7 cells. (F) Apoptotic rate of MCF-7 cells induced by different compounds. *P<0.05 vs. the blank control. DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide; Dox, doxorubicin.
Cell cycle distribution in MCF-7 cells.
| Phase | Blank, % | DMSO, % | Dox, % | KU60019, % | Dox and KU60019, % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G0G1 | 44.3±0.96 | 43.8±2.12 | 48.4±2.07 | 69.2±0.93 | 54.8±1.08 |
| S | 34.0±0.33 | 34.2±0.54 | 21.1±0.76 | 8.7±0.22 | 13.5±0.93 |
| G2/M | 21.9±1.07 | 21.7±1.82 | 30.4±1.03 | 21.6±0.94 | 30.1±1.02 |
P<0.05 vs. blank control. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation.
DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide; Dox, doxorubicin.
Figure 3Effect of KU60019 and/or Dox on the migration and invasion ability of MCF-7 cells. (A) Images of representative crystal violet-stained membranes are shown from the migration and invasion assays. (B) Quantitative evaluation of cell migration ability (chambers without Matrigel); the migrating cells were counted in six predetermined fields. (C) Quantitative evaluation of cell invasion ability (chambers with Matrigel); the invading cells were counted in six predetermined fields. *P<0.05 vs. blank control. DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide; Dox, doxorubicin.
Figure 4Western blot analysis in MCF-7 cell lines. *P<0.05 vs. blank control. ATM, ataxia telangiectasia mutated; DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide; Dox, doxorubicin.