| Literature DB >> 25289079 |
Michael Mohr1, Christoph Schliemann1, Christoph Biermann1, Lars-Henning Schmidt1, Torsten Kessler1, Joachim Schmidt2, Karsten Wiebe2, Klaus-Michael Müller3, Thomas K Hoffmann4, Andreas H Groll5, Claudius Werner6, Christina Kessler6, Rainer Wiewrodt1, Claudia Rudack7, Wolfgang E Berdel1.
Abstract
Recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP) is a primary benign disease, which is characterized by papillomatous growth in the respiratory tract. Malignant transformation occurs in only 3-5% of cases, however, local growth of the benign papillomas is interpreted as clinically malignant in a markedly higher proportion of patients. Local surgical or endoscopic interventional debulking or excision is currently the commonly selected treatment method and antiviral therapy is a potential adjuvant approach. However, the long-term management of RRP patients, who commonly require multiple procedures over numerous years, is challenging and the overall therapeutic armamentarium remains unsatisfactory. The administration of systemic bevacizumab treatment in a series of five patients with long histories of RRP, who required repeated local interventions to control papilloma growth is evaluated. Treatment with the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibody bevacizumab was administered at a dose of 5 mg/kg (n=1), 10 mg/kg (n=3) or 15 mg/kg (n=1) intravenously to the five RRP patients, who were clinically classified as exhibiting progressive disease. Endoscopic evaluations were performed prior to the first infusion of bevacizumab and intermittently at variable time points during the course of therapy. Histopathological analyses were performed using pre- and post-treatment papilloma biopsies, including immunohistochemical analyses of VEGF and phosphorylated VEGF receptor (VEGFR)-2 expression. The patients received between three and 16 courses of bevacizumab (median, six courses). The first course was initiated when progression following the previous intervention was observed. An immediate response to bevacizumab treatment was demonstrated in all five RRP patients. While the cumulative number of interventions in the five patients was 18 throughout the 12 months prior to the initiation of bevacizumab treatment, only one patient required interventional treatment due to a malignant transformation during the 12 months following treatment with bevacizumab (18 vs. 1 interventions, P=0.042). Histopathological analyses revealed regressive perivascular edema and normalization of the vascular structure, however, immunohistochemical analyses of the VEGF and phosphorylated VEGFR-2 expression did not demonstrate any changes following therapy. Due to the limited number of alternative treatments, VEGF-targeted therapies may represent a promising novel strategy in the treatment of RRP, which may have the potential to modify the current treatment standards, particularly in patients with poorly accessible papilloma lesions, however, this requires further investigation in clinical trials.Entities:
Keywords: anti-angiogenesis; bevacizumab; papillomatosis
Year: 2014 PMID: 25289079 PMCID: PMC4186578 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2014.2486
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncol Lett ISSN: 1792-1074 Impact factor: 2.967
Patient characteristics.
| Patient | Age at initial diagnosis (years) | Gender (M/F) | Total debulking interventions pre-bevacizumab | Age at treatment initiation (years) | Cycles (n) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | M | >30 | 43 | 16 |
| 2 | 49 | M | 2 | 49 | 3 |
| 3 | 53 | F | 16 | 56 | 6 |
| 4 | 2 | F | >30 | 8 | 9 |
| 5 | 32 | M | 6 | 34 | 6 |
M, male; F, female.
Figure 1Representative bronchoscopic images of the laryngeal (first row) and tracheal (second row) papilloma manifestations in Patient 1. Images in the first column demonstrate the pre-therapeutic condition. On day three, following the first dose of bevacizumab, a significant regression of papilloma lesions was observed (second column) and a very good partial remission with only minimal papilloma residues was documented under continuous bevacizumab treatment on day 139 (third column).
Figure 2(A) Patient 1: Computed tomography (CT) scannings of a pulmonary mass in the left lower lobe prior to and one year after initiation of bevacizumab treatment. (B) Patient 5: CT of the (a) left maxillary sinus and (b) left frontal sinus that were initially obstructed by inverted papilloma and were cleared following three cycles of bevacizumab therapy.
Figure 3Bronchoscopic images of papilloma manifestations. (A) Patient 2: Laryngeal papilloma manifestations prior to bevacizumab (left), on day four following administration of bevacizumab (middle) and on day 20 under continuation of systemic bevacizumab treatment (right). (B) Patient 3: Supraglottic papilloma lesion prior to administration of bevacizumab (left) and on day 158 (right). (C) Patient 4: Papilloma manifestations in the right main bronchus prior to (left) and on day 180 following initiation of bevacizumab therapy (right). (D) Patient 5: Papilloma located on the velum prior to (left), on day four (middle) and on day 20 following the first administration of bevacizumab (right).
Figure 4Histopathological changes following bevacizumab therapy. Biopsies obtained (A) prior to and (B) following bevacizumab therapy (four cycles) reveal a marked decrease of perivascular edema (stain, hematoxilin and eosin; magnification, ×200).
Summary of the clinical efficacy of systemic bevacizumab treatment.
| Case | Best response | Freedom from progression following treatment discontinuation (months) | Second response following treatment discontinuation and progression | No. of interventions in 12 months | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Prior to bevacizumab | Following bevacizumab | ||||
| 1 | VGPR | >4 | N.a. | 3 | 0 |
| 2 | PR | N.a. | N.a. | 2 | 1 |
| 3 | VGPR | 9 | Yes | 6 | 0 |
| 4 | VGPR | 5 | Yes | 3 | 0 |
| 5 | PR | 2 | Yes | 4 | 0 |
| All | - | - | - | 18 | 1 |
Laryngectomy for malignant transformation.
P=0.042.
VGPR, very good partial remission; PR, partial response; N.a., not applicable.