| Literature DB >> 25289016 |
Mohamed A A Seleim1, Kamal A M Abo-Elyousr2, Kenawy M Abd-El-Moneem2, Farag A Saead2.
Abstract
This study aims to isolate and identify the causal pathogen of tomato bacterial wilt in Egypt. In 2008, tomato plants showing typical symptoms of bacterial wilt disease with no foliar yellowing were observed in Minia, Assiut and Sohag governorates, Egypt. When cut stems of symptomatic plants were submerged in water, whitish ooze was evident and longitudinal sections showed a brown discoloration in the vascular tissues. Bacteria were isolated on triphenyl tetrazolium chloride medium and fifteen isolates shown typical morphological and cultural characteristics were confirmed as Ralstonia solanacearum biovar 2 race 1. Pathogenicity tests showed that all isolates proved to be pathogenic to tomato plants, varied from 52 to 97% wilting. This is the first report of R. solanacearum biovar 2 race 1 causing bacterial wilt in tomato crop in Egypt.Entities:
Keywords: Ralstonia solanacearum; bacterial wilt; tomato
Year: 2014 PMID: 25289016 PMCID: PMC4181112 DOI: 10.5423/PPJ.NT.10.2013.0101
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plant Pathol J ISSN: 1598-2254 Impact factor: 1.795
Pathogenicity tests for Ralstonia solanacearum isolates on seedlings under greenhouse condition
| No. of isolate | Sources of isolate | Disease index (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||
| District | Crop | 3 week | 4 week | |
| R1 | Minia | Tomato | 52gh | 81b |
| R2 | Tomato | 76a | 97a | |
| R3 | Tomato | 65c | 74cd | |
| R4 | Tomato | 60d | 66ef | |
| R5 | Water | 48i | 52h | |
| R6 | Water | 53fg | 55h | |
| R7 | Tomato | 70b | 70cde | |
|
| ||||
| R8 | Assiut | Tomato | 67c | 73cd |
| R9 | Tomato | 74.5a | 76bc | |
| R10 | Tomato | 54.5ef | 55h | |
| R11 | Tomato | 56e | 68def | |
| R12 | Tomato | 56.75e | 72cde | |
| R13 | Soil | 53fg | 53h | |
|
| ||||
| R14 | Sohag | Tomato | 50hi | 62fg |
| R15 | Tomato | 53fg | 56.25gh | |
|
| ||||
| Control | 0j | 0i | ||
|
| ||||
| LSD (P = 0.05) | 2.46 | 6.29 | ||
Values in the column followed by the same letter within a column are not significantly different as determined by the LSD test (P = 0.05).
Morphological and Biochemical characteristics of Ralstonia solanacearum isolates from different locations
| Tests | Isolates (R1–R5) | |
|---|---|---|
| Morphological | Shape of cells | Rod |
| Gram stain | ||
| Spore formation | ||
| Motility | + | |
| Yellow pigmentation on KB | ||
|
| ||
| Biochemical | Oxidase test | + |
| Catalase test | + | |
| Gelatin hydrolysis | ||
| Arginine dihydrolase | ||
| Tolerance of NaCl | ||
| 0.5% | + | |
| 1% | + | |
| 1.5% | + | |
| 2% | ||
| H2S production | + | |
| Indole formation | ||
| Starch hydrolysis | ||
| Aesculin hydrolysis | ||
| Levan production | ||
| Growth at | ||
| 37°C | + | |
| 41°C | ||
| Acid from Hexose alcohols | ||
| Mannitol | ||
| Sorbitol | ||
| Dulcitol | ||
| Cellobiose | + | |
| Disaccharides | ||
| Lactose | + | |
| Maltose | + | |
all isolates gave the same reaction
+ Positive
− Negative
Reaction of tobacco leaves to infiltration with isolates of Ralstonia solanacearum
| No. of isolate | Hours after infiltration | Race | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| 48 h | 72 h | ||
| R1 | HR | HR | 1 |
| R2 | HR | HR | 1 |
| R3 | HR | HR | 1 |
| R4 | HR | HR | 1 |
| R5 | C | C | 3 |
| R6 | C | C | 3 |
| R7 | C | C | 1 |
| R8 | HR | HR | 1 |
| R9 | HR | HR | 1 |
| R10 | N | HR | 1 |
| R11 | HR | HR | 1 |
| R12 | HR | HR | 1 |
| R13 | C | C | 3 |
| R14 | C | C | 3 |
| R15 | C | C | 3 |
N = No reaction, HR = hypersensitivity reaction and C = collapse of infiltrating area.