Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allows investigators and clinicians to observe the anatomy and injuries of the cerebral white matter (CWM) in dogs. However, dynamic images based on the diffusion tensor (DT) technique are required to assess fiber tract integrity of the CWM. Diffusion tensor tractography (DTT) produces a three-dimensional representation in which data are displayed on a colored map obtained from the anisotropy of water molecules in the CWM tracts. Fractional anisotropy (FA) is a value that measures changes in water diffusion, which can occur if the CWM tracts are displaced, disrupted, or infiltrated. The goal of this study was to determine the feasibility of DTT for in vivo examination of the normal appearance of CWM in dogs through visual and quantitative analysis of the most representative CWM tracts. Nine tractographies were performed on healthy dogs using a 3T MRI scanner. T1- and T2-weighted images and DTI were acquired at different planes. Using DTT, three-dimensional reconstructions were obtained. Fractional ansisotropy and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of the right and left corticospinal tracts, corpus callosum, cingulum, and right and left fronto-occipital fasciculus were determined. Tract reconstructions were similar in 8/9 healthy dogs. Values for FA and ADC were similar in all the dogs. In one dog, tract reconstructions were inhomogeneous; these were displaced because it had larger lateral ventricles. Findings indicated that DTT is a feasible technique for in vivo study of CWM in dogs and that it complements information from conventional MRI.
Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allows investigators and clinicians to observe the anatomy and injuries of the cerebral white matter (CWM) in dogs. However, dynamic images based on the diffusion tensor (DT) technique are required to assess fiber tract integrity of the CWM. Diffusion tensor tractography (DTT) produces a three-dimensional representation in which data are displayed on a colored map obtained from the anisotropy of water molecules in the CWM tracts. Fractional anisotropy (FA) is a value that measures changes in water diffusion, which can occur if the CWM tracts are displaced, disrupted, or infiltrated. The goal of this study was to determine the feasibility of DTT for in vivo examination of the normal appearance of CWM in dogs through visual and quantitative analysis of the most representative CWM tracts. Nine tractographies were performed on healthy dogs using a 3T MRI scanner. T1- and T2-weighted images and DTI were acquired at different planes. Using DTT, three-dimensional reconstructions were obtained. Fractional ansisotropy and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of the right and left corticospinal tracts, corpus callosum, cingulum, and right and left fronto-occipital fasciculus were determined. Tract reconstructions were similar in 8/9 healthy dogs. Values for FA and ADC were similar in all the dogs. In one dog, tract reconstructions were inhomogeneous; these were displaced because it had larger lateral ventricles. Findings indicated that DTT is a feasible technique for in vivo study of CWM in dogs and that it complements information from conventional MRI.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly considered to be the tool of choice for
diagnosing central nervous system diseases in both humans and animals, especially diseases affecting
cerebral white matter.1–3 However, a disadvantage of conventional MRI is that it does not allow visualization of
cerebral white matter constituent fiber tracts and their connectivity.4 Previously, the anatomy of cerebral white matter tracts could be studied only through
invasive methods, and such methods could reveal only a few tracts in vivo
(neurosurgery) or in anatomical specimens; none could be observed with imaging studies.1,5,6 Diffusion tensor tractography (DTT) is a widely used imaging technique that is
effective for several human central nervous system disorders, and the images generated with this
technique surpass those generated by structural imaging.7
However, there are no reports on DTT use in veterinary medicine for either diagnostic imaging or for
studying cerebral white matter in dogs in vivo. The objective of this study was to
establish the feasibility of DTT for in vivo visualization and evaluation of the
normal appearance of canine cerebral white matter using visual and quantitative analyses of the most
representative tracts in this species. Diffusion tensor tractography is a noninvasive technique that
can identify and represent fibers of the cerebral white matter, and their connections in the brain
in vivo. In addition to displaying specific cerebral white matter fibers, this
technique can also improve the quantification of diffusion characteristics within these fibers.8 This technique provides a three-dimensional representation of
diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and data can be displayed on a colored map obtained from information
on the directionality of the movement of water molecules along the main fiber tracts of cerebral
white matter. In DTT, colors are assigned to nerve fiber tracts depending on the direction of water
displacement. The colors represent the predominant orientation of the fibers in a three-dimensional
coordinate system in the three axes of space (x, y, and z); where red indicates a right-left
direction, green indicates a dorsoventral direction, and blue indicates a rostrocaudal direction.
This type of representation is called an anisotropic map.9,10 In human medicine, this technique has great
potential for studying numerous diseases because the results of DTT and clinical symptoms can be
compared directly. This technique is commonly used to study the anatomy and maturation of the
normal, aging brain, but it also can be used to help diagnose neurological conditions, including
brain ischemia, multiple sclerosis, diffuse axonal injury, epilepsy, metabolic disorders, certain
mental illnesses, and brain tumors, as well as establish a prognosis for patients with these
conditions.11,12
Though DTI has been extensively used to investigate brains of the dogs ex
vivo,13–15 there are no reports on the in vivo use of DTT to study cerebral white
matter in dogs. The ability to trace cerebral white matter fibers in the dog generates a number of
opportunities for potential clinical applications, and has both diagnostic and prognostic utility
for various central nervous system pathologies6 affecting the
canine species.
Principle of DTI
It is possible to study global cerebral white matter connections in vivo through
diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). The images generated by this technique are obtained by measuring
the restricted diffusion of water molecules in brain tissue. Diffusion-weighted imaging assumes that
water diffusivity is represented by an ellipsoid tensor in each voxel, that determines the main
direction of diffusion, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and fractional anisotropy (FA); this
method is known as DTI.3,4,16 Diffusion tensor imaging is a relatively new MRI
method that has been used successfully in human medicine and in some animal species.9,10,12,17 Diffusion tensor imaging is a
mathematical model of three-dimensional diffusion consisting of a matrix of numbers from diffusion
measurements in at least six different directions, but can be up to 128 directions; from these, the
diffusion in any arbitrary direction or the direction of maximum diffusivity can be determined in
any plane. Diffusion tensor imaging can map the degree of anisotropy and the direction of a local
fiber, voxel-by-voxel, thus providing a new and unique opportunity to study cerebral white matter
architecture in vivo.11,18 Diffusion tensor imaging uses the anisotropy of water diffusion
in the brain and can be used to analyze and monitor cerebral white matter fibers, provide useful
anatomical and microstructural information of major brain regions in animal models both in
vivo and ex vivo, and assess brain damage.3,11,13
Anisotropy is a property of normal brain tissue that depends on the directionality of water
molecules and the integrity of white matter fibers. Fractional anisotropy is the most commonly used
parameter to detect alterations in water diffusion, which can occur if the cerebral white matter
tracts are displaced, disrupted, or infiltrated. It is a numeric variable with values ranging from 0
to 1. A value of 0 corresponds to maximum isotropy; such a value can be observed in subarachnoid
spaces and in normal ventricles where water is mobilized freely (a process known as isotropic
diffusion). A value of one corresponds to maximum anisotropy or restriction in the movement of
tissue water; such a value can be found in the brain parenchyma and is known as anisotropic
diffusion.9,10,19 The average diffusivity is represented by the ADC for isotropic
diffusion. The apparent diffusion coefficient is usually used to characterize the overall
displacement of water molecules. It is not susceptible to diffusion gradient applied directions;
therefore, the ADC contrast is insensitive to the anisotropy effect.13 Because the ADC value does not sufficiently describe anisotropic diffusion the DTI must
also be used.11
Material and Methods
Experimental Animals
Nine healthy caninepatients of varying breeds and genders from Hospital Imagen were
prospectively recruited. All dogs were 3–5 years old with an average weight of 12 kg. The
dogs received a general physical and neurological exam, and blood samples were taken for a
preanesthetic profile. The dogs were fasted for 8 h prior to the imaging procedure. During the
imaging procedure, the dogs were anesthetized with diazepam (2 mg/kg IV, valium, Roche, Nutley, New
Jersey) and propofol (4 mg/kg IV, recofol, Bayer, Turku, Finland). Animals were handled according to
the Technical Specifications for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the Official Mexican
Standards.20 None of the animals were euthanized.
Image Acquisition Technique
The MRI protocol was carried out in the same 3 Tesla scanner for all dogs using an 8-channel
cranial antenna (Achieva system, Philips Medical Systems, Best, The Netherlands). Diffusion tensor
imaging was performed on each patient (spin echo EPI, TR = 6000 ms, TE = 80 ms, matrix
= 72 × 68, slice thickness = 1.5 mm); diffusion gradients were used in 32
nonparallel directions (b = 800 s/mm2) for duration of 16 min. Moreover, T1- and
T2-enhanced images were acquired to obtain a high-resolution anatomical reference
(three-dimensional-fast field echo, TE = 3.6 ms, TR = 7.5 ms, matrix = 220
× 218, slice thickness = 2 mm).
Diffusion Tensor Imaging Acquisition and Assignment of Direction
T1- and T2-weighted images and DTI were obtained in different planes (transverse, dorsal, and
sagittal). Three-dimensional reconstructions, FA, and ADC values were obtained for the left and
right corticospinal tracts, the corpus callosum, the cingulum, and the right and left
fronto-occipital fasciculus to visually, evaluate, and quantify these fiber tracts.
Diffusion Tensor Imaging Tractographies
Diffusion tensor tractography was performed by importing DTI into image analysis software that
was provided by the scanner manufacturer (FiberTrak, ®Philips Medical Systems Inc.; Best, The
Netherlands). Cerebral white matter tracts were identified using regions of interest (ROIs) that
were manually placed by Hernández Jael Sarahí with the advice of Marrufo Oscar. The
software identified tracts based on finding the most favorable path between two manually placed
ROIs. Regions of interest were positioned where trajectories of the cerebral white matter fiber
tracts were estimated to be, based on veterinary anatomy guides and a human DTI atlas.11,21, 22 High-resolution T1-images were placed on top of the colored map to identify
connections between anatomical structures. The different tracts were identified, delineated, and
reconstructed at different points along their trajectory using the color map in the sagittal,
dorsal, and transverse planes, which were reconstructed using a fiber-tracking algorithm. The
propagation ended when the tract trajectory reached a voxel with a FA value less than 0.15 mm, when
the tract was less than 10 mm long, or when the angle between two consecutive steps was greater than
45°. Data were coded in red to indicate a right-left direction, green to indicate a
dorsoventral direction, and blue to indicate a rostrocaudal direction. The cerebral white matter
tracts were assigned to three groups of fibers: projection, commissural, and association
fibers.11
Data Analysis
Statistical analyses were selected and performed by authors MSAG and JSHA with the advice of
Hernández Jaime Alonso using a commercially available statistical software package (SSPS,
version 19, Microsoft, Chicago, IL).Mean tract FA and ADC values, their standard errors, and standard deviation were calculated by
authors MSAG and JSHA with the advice of Hernández Jaime Alonso. A confidence interval of
95% or a significance value of P < 0.05 was used for the mean.A quantitative assessment of ventricular volume (VV) in relation to the brain volume (BV) was
also performed by author JSHA with the advice of author OMM using manual segmentation in regions of
interest (ROIs) on the image analysis freeware (OsiriX v.3.9.4) in the nine healthy dogs. The means,
standard errors, standard deviations, and 95% confidence intervals for the means of the VV in
relation to the BV of the right and the left side were obtained.
Results
Three-dimensional reconstructions of the corticospinal tract, corpus callosum, cingulum, and
fronto-occipital fasciculus were generated for each of the nine dogs. Fibers in the corticospinal
tract component of the projection fiber group were displayed in blue and green (Fig.1A, B, C). Blue fibers connected cortical areas in the cerebral
cortex, the brain stem, and spinal cord. Green fibers connected the corona radiate, internal
capsule, and cerebral peduncle. Fibers in the corpus callosum component of the commissural fiber
group were displayed in red and connected the two cerebral hemispheres (Fig.2A, B, C). The cingulum component of the association fiber group appeared as long
fibers, and these were displayed in blue (Fig.3A, B, C).
These fibers had a rostrocaudal orientation and connected cortical areas in each hemisphere. Fibers
in the superior and inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus component of the association fiber group
were long and displayed in blue (Fig.4A, B, C). These fibers
had a rostrocaudal orientation and connected cortical areas in each hemisphere and in the frontal
and occipital lobes. Three-dimensional reconstructions of the tracts were homogeneous and uniform in
geometry and spatial orientation in eight of the nine healthy dogs. In one dog, tract
reconstructions were not homogeneous or uniform because the fibers were displaced, most evident in
the corticospinal tract and corpus callosum (Fig.5). There
was a significant difference in the VV in relation to the BV in this dog (Table 1).
Fig 1
Images illustrating the corticospinal tract in a healthy dog. (A) Diffusion tensor tractography
(DTT) image, side view. (B) T1-Weighted image and DTT image, sagittal view. (C) Diffusion tensor
tractography (DTT) image on the colored map, transverse sectional view.
Fig 2
Images illustrating the corpus callosum in a healthy dog. (A) Diffusion tensor tractography (DTT)
image, side view. (B) T1-weighted image and DTT image, dorsal view. (C) Diffusion tensor
tractography image on the colored map, dorsal view.
Fig 3
Images illustrating the cingulum in a healthy dog. (A) Diffusion tensor tractography (DTT) image,
dorsal view. (B) T1-weighted image and DTT image, dorsal view. (C) Diffusion tensor tractography
image on the colored map, dorsal view.
Fig 4
Images illustrating the fronto-temporo-occipital tract in a healthy dog. (A) Diffusion tensor
tractography (DTT), side view. (B) T1-weighted image and DTT image, sagittal view. (C) Diffusion
tensor tractography image on the colored map, dorsal view.
Fig 5
Comparison between a healthy dog with large lateral ventricles and a healthy dog with normal
ventricles. (A) Diffusion tensor tractography (DTT) image, corticospinal tract with altered
topography and corpus callosum due to large lateral ventricles, dorsal view. (B) Diffusion tensor
tractography image, corticospinal tract with normal downward topography of the fibers, dorsal view.
(C) T1-weighted image and DTT image, corticospinal tract with anterior and lateral displacement of
the fibers and of the corpus callosum due to large lateral ventricles, dorsal view. (D) T1-weighted
image and DTT image, corticospinal tract with normal downward topography of the fibers, dorsal view.
(E) Diffusion tensor tractography image of the corticospinal tract on the colored map with anterior
and lateral displacement of the fibers and of the corpus callosum due to large lateral ventricles,
dorsal view. (F) Diffusion tensor tractography image, corticospinal tract on the colored map with
normal topography of the fibers, dorsal view.
Table 1
Ventricular Volume in Relation to the Brain Volume in Nine Healthy Dogs
Relation
Healthy dogs (n = 9)
Ventricle volume/ Brain volume (cm3)
X
SE
SD
CI 95%
RVV/BV Left
0.051
0.019
±0.057
(O.007, 0.095)
RVV/BV Right
0.044
0.016
±0.047
(0.007, 0.080)
R, relation; VV, ventricle volume; BV, brain volume; X, mean; SE, standard error; SD, standard
deviation; CI, 95% confidence interval for the mean.
Ventricular Volume in Relation to the Brain Volume in Nine Healthy DogsR, relation; VV, ventricle volume; BV, brain volume; X, mean; SE, standard error; SD, standard
deviation; CI, 95% confidence interval for the mean.Images illustrating the corticospinal tract in a healthy dog. (A) Diffusion tensor tractography
(DTT) image, side view. (B) T1-Weighted image and DTT image, sagittal view. (C) Diffusion tensor
tractography (DTT) image on the colored map, transverse sectional view.Images illustrating the corpus callosum in a healthy dog. (A) Diffusion tensor tractography (DTT)
image, side view. (B) T1-weighted image and DTT image, dorsal view. (C) Diffusion tensor
tractography image on the colored map, dorsal view.Images illustrating the cingulum in a healthy dog. (A) Diffusion tensor tractography (DTT) image,
dorsal view. (B) T1-weighted image and DTT image, dorsal view. (C) Diffusion tensor tractography
image on the colored map, dorsal view.Images illustrating the fronto-temporo-occipital tract in a healthy dog. (A) Diffusion tensor
tractography (DTT), side view. (B) T1-weighted image and DTT image, sagittal view. (C) Diffusion
tensor tractography image on the colored map, dorsal view.Comparison between a healthy dog with large lateral ventricles and a healthy dog with normal
ventricles. (A) Diffusion tensor tractography (DTT) image, corticospinal tract with altered
topography and corpus callosum due to large lateral ventricles, dorsal view. (B) Diffusion tensor
tractography image, corticospinal tract with normal downward topography of the fibers, dorsal view.
(C) T1-weighted image and DTT image, corticospinal tract with anterior and lateral displacement of
the fibers and of the corpus callosum due to large lateral ventricles, dorsal view. (D) T1-weighted
image and DTT image, corticospinal tract with normal downward topography of the fibers, dorsal view.
(E) Diffusion tensor tractography image of the corticospinal tract on the colored map with anterior
and lateral displacement of the fibers and of the corpus callosum due to large lateral ventricles,
dorsal view. (F) Diffusion tensor tractography image, corticospinal tract on the colored map with
normal topography of the fibers, dorsal view.The means, standard errors, standard deviations, and 95% confidence intervals for the
means of the FA and ADC values for the six tracts were obtained from all nine dogs (Table 2). Similarities in the FA and ADC values were identified in the
nine healthy dogs.
Table 2
Fractional Anisotropy and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values of Six Cerebral White Matter
Tracts in Healthy Dogs
Healthy dogs (n = 9)
FA
ADC(10−3 mm2 s−1)
Tracts
X
SE
SD
CI 95%
X
SE
SD
CI 95%
Corticospinal (Right)
0.391
0.009
±0.026
(O.371, 0.412)
1.154
0.063
±0.189
(1.009, 1.299)
Corticospinal (Left)
0.400
0.006
±0.018
(0.387, 0.414)
1.104
0.055
±0.164
(0.977, 1.230)
Corpus Callosum
0.365
0.007
±0.022
(0.348, 0.382)
0.975
0.033
±0.099
(0.899, 1.051)
Cingulum
0.336
0.011
±0.032
(0.311, 0.360)
0.847
0.053
±0.159
(0.725, 0.969)
Fronto-occipital (Right)
0.331
0.009
±0.026
(O.311, 0.350)
0.879
0.009
±0.028
(0.858, 0.901)
Fronto-occipital (Left)
0.331
0.010
±0.029
(0.308, 0.353)
0.913
0.010
±0.031
(0.888, 0.937)
FA, fractional anisotropy; ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient; X, mean; SE, standard error; SD,
standard deviation; CI, 95% confidence interval for the mean.
Fractional Anisotropy and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values of Six Cerebral White Matter
Tracts in Healthy DogsFA, fractional anisotropy; ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient; X, mean; SE, standard error; SD,
standard deviation; CI, 95% confidence interval for the mean.
Discussion
To our knowledge, the current study was the first to visually and quantitatively describe the
trajectory of cerebral white matter fiber tracts in a group of live dogs using DTT for diagnostic
purpose. Diffusion tensor tractography imaging resolution allowed rapid display and identification
of the most representative cerebral white matter fiber tracts in this sample population of nine
healthy dogs of varying breeds and genders. This technique described anatomical, geometric, and
spatial properties of the fibers. In addition, the conduction properties of the fibers could be
estimated through FA and ADC quantification. There was homogeneity and uniformity in the
three-dimensional reconstructions in nearly all dogs. Quantification of the FA and ADC values of the
most representative tracts was similar in all nine dogs, thus demonstrating the feasibility of the
technique and the analysis of the normal appearance of the cerebral white matter (CWM) in dogs
in vivo. The analysis of the images in different planes and the three-dimensional
reconstructions of the fiber tracts revealed a visual difference in the normal cerebral white matter
appearance in one of the nine healthy dogs. This dog showed an altered topography of the
corticospinal tract and corpus callosum due to displacement of the fibers. Quantitative assessment
of ventricular volume in relation to the brain volume showed that this dog had larger lateral
ventricles in relation to the other dogs. Authors believe this was most likely a normal variant
because the dog exhibited no clinical neurological signs at the time of imaging. Other studies have
shown that some canine species may exhibit a broad range of normal cerebral ventricular sizes, as
assessed by neuroimaging, and that cerebral ventricular size is quite variable in a normal dog.23,24The only values quantified in the current study were those specific to the fiber tract and not to
the ROIs because our research focused on demonstrating the feasibility of DTT for displaying and the
normal appearance of the most representative cerebral white matter fiber tracts of healthy dogs
in vivo. The quantification of FA and ADC values, or the exact description of the
ROIs, were not used to visualize fiber tracts, as in our experience these values and descriptions
can be obtained at different points of the fiber tract trajectories using the colored map. Future
studies are needed to develop a method for preparing DTT templates and to reconstruct cerebral white
matter pathways in the healthy dog in vivo using an ROI approach. This method is
similar to the method used in humans and provides virtual representations of cerebral white matter
tracts that are faithful to the classical ex vivo descriptions that include a
detailed anatomical study of canines. The preparation of cerebral white matter templates for the
healthy dog in vivo will allow investigators to follow the trajectory of the fibers
delineating ROIs in DTI for DTT reconstruction. Improved knowledge of anatomy and the development of
a template as a guide for the placement of ROIs could be used in future applications such as
teaching and guiding virtual dissections of cerebral white matter tracts in healthy dogs in
vivo, and comparision with pathological cases where the anatomy is observed distorted by
the underlying disease process.5,21 Our findings are preliminary and future research will be needed to evaluate the
use of DTT in clinical cases. Indeed, the use of this technique as a diagnostic tool is currently
limited because templates and standardized FA and ADC values of the cerebral white matter of healthy
dogsin vivo (which are prerequisites for the use of this technique in pathological
cases) are lacking.3 Three previous canine DTI studies were
conducted ex vivo,11,13,25 and one was conducted in
vivo.26 In these studies, DTI was used to examine
the structure and microstructure of the cerebral white matter but not for diagnostic purposes in
canines. The findings of one study 11 supported our study in
that they also revealed the presence of association, commissural, and projection fibers in the dog.
These data and information are also available in humans,21
and this allowed us to identify, compare, and reconstruct different fiber tracts in our healthy dogs
in vivo.One of the limitations of the current study was that acquiring DTI data in dogs in
vivo required a longer scan time (16 min) than scan times reported in studies in dogs
ex vivo13 and that this resulted in
motion-related artifacts. Another limitation was the lack of a standardized canine template for
placing ROIs. Regions of interest in the current study were manually placed based on subjective
criteria and reproducibility was not measured. However, despite these limitations, the results of
our study showed that the DTT reconstructions allowed identification and differentiation of CWM
tracts in dogs in vivo, and that these reconstructions were comparable with those
obtained in ex vivo canine studies.11 These
preliminary technical aspects must be overcome before this technique can be routinely used in
clinical practice, and before this tool can be considered a complementary diagnostic method for
conventional MRI. As new MRI options become increasingly available for daily clinical veterinary
practice, novel diffusion techniques such as DTT warrant further exploration.In conclusion, findings from the current study indicated that DTT is a feasible noninvasive
technique for in vivo study of CWM fiber tracts in the dog. Authors believe that
the implementation of DTT as a noninvasive diagnostic method will complement conventional MRI, thus
allowing investigators to examine the microstructural characteristics of the brain in
vivo, and to obtain information on the anatomy, connectivity, and morphology of possible
damage to fiber tracts in dogs suffering intracranial pathology or injury. Future research is needed
to develop standardized ROI templates for in vivo canine studies and to compare DTT
findings with confirmed pathologic findings.
Authors: Paula Martín-Vaquero; Ronaldo C Da Costa; Rita L Echandi; Christina L Tosti; Michael V Knopp; Steffen Sammet Journal: Vet Radiol Ultrasound Date: 2011 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 1.363
Authors: Yu-Chien Wu; Aaron S Field; Ian D Duncan; Alexey A Samsonov; Yoichi Kondo; Dana Tudorascu; Andrew L Alexander Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2011-07-12 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Maria Giulia Preti; Alessandro Di Marzio; Alfonso Mastropietro; Domenico Aquino; Giuseppe Baselli; Maria Marcella Laganà; Ileana Zucca; Carolina Frassoni; Roberto Spreafico Journal: Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Date: 2011
Authors: Peter T Wei; Dalun Leong; Evan Calabrese; Leonard White; Theodore Pierce; Simon Platt; James Provenzale Journal: Neuroradiol J Date: 2013-11-07
Authors: Olivier Jacqmot; Bert Van Thielen; Yves Fierens; Martha Hammond; Inneke Willekens; Peter Van Schuerbeek; Filip Verhelle; Peter Goossens; Filip De Ridder; Jan Pieter Clarys; Anne Vanbinst; Johan De Mey Journal: Anat Rec (Hoboken) Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 2.064
Authors: Theodore T Pierce; Evan Calabrese; Leonard E White; Steven D Chen; Simon R Platt; James M Provenzale Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Visish M Srinivasan; Joy Gumin; Kevin M Camstra; Dalis E Collins; Melissa M Chen; Elizabeth J Shpall; Brittany C Parker Kerrigan; Jeremiah N Johnson; Stephen R Chen; Juan Fueyo; Cande Gomez-Manzano; Frederick F Lang; Peter Kan Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2020-12-15 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Clare Rusbridge; Sam Long; Jelena Jovanovik; Marjorie Milne; Mette Berendt; Sofie F M Bhatti; Luisa De Risio; Robyn G Farqhuar; Andrea Fischer; Kaspar Matiasek; Karen Muñana; Edward E Patterson; Akos Pakozdy; Jacques Penderis; Simon Platt; Michael Podell; Heidrun Potschka; Veronika M Stein; Andrea Tipold; Holger A Volk Journal: BMC Vet Res Date: 2015-08-28 Impact factor: 2.741
Authors: Jennifer L Robinson; Madhura Baxi; Jeffrey S Katz; Paul Waggoner; Ronald Beyers; Edward Morrison; Nouha Salibi; Thomas S Denney; Vitaly Vodyanoy; Gopikrishna Deshpande Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-11-25 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Valentina Pieri; Marco Trovatelli; Marcello Cadioli; Davide Danilo Zani; Stefano Brizzola; Giuliano Ravasio; Fabio Acocella; Mauro Di Giancamillo; Luca Malfassi; Mario Dolera; Marco Riva; Lorenzo Bello; Andrea Falini; Antonella Castellano Journal: Front Vet Sci Date: 2019-10-16
Authors: Germain Arribarat; Benjamin Cartiaux; Samuel Boucher; Charles Montel; Hélène Gros-Dagnac; Yoann Fave; Patrice Péran; Giovanni Mogicato; Alexandra Deviers Journal: Front Neuroanat Date: 2022-09-02 Impact factor: 3.543