Literature DB >> 25288355

Improving care for patients with oesophageal and gastric cancer: impact of a statewide multidisciplinary team.

Eleanor E Wilson1, Sarah K Thompson2, Jeff Bull1, Bronwyn Jones2, Timothy Price3, Peter G Devitt2, David I Watson1, Tim Bright1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To standardize management of upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancer in South Australia, a statewide video linked multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting was established in late 2009. Although cancer MDTs are recognized as a standard of care, it is important to audit their impact.
METHODS: A retrospective audit of MDT outcomes and recommendations for patients reviewed by the upper GI MDT between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2011 was undertaken. The proportion of patients with new upper GI malignancies reviewed and the proportion reviewed within 2 weeks of diagnosis were determined. Recommendations from the MDT meetings regarding treatment intent, management, investigations and trial participation were audited.
RESULTS: From 2010 to 2011, the proportion of newly diagnosed upper GI malignancies in South Australia reviewed by the MDT increased from 43.2% to 54.3%. More oesophageal than gastric cancer cases were reviewed by the MDT. The proportion of patients reviewed within 2 weeks of diagnosis increased from 20% to 50%. The proportion of patients referred for neoadjuvant or definitive chemoradiotherapy increased from 2010 to 2011. Fifty per cent of all patients reviewed were recommended to have further investigations. Recommendations for clinical trial participation increased from 0% in 2010 to 11% in 2011.
CONCLUSION: A statewide upper GI cancer MDT is feasible. Implementation of the MDT was followed by an increase in the number of patients reviewed and the proportion reviewed within 2 weeks of diagnosis. Greater awareness of the MDT and access to it may be required to continue to increase the proportion of cancers reviewed.
© 2014 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  esophageal cancer; gastric cancer; multidisciplinary communication; upper gut

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25288355     DOI: 10.1111/ans.12869

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ANZ J Surg        ISSN: 1445-1433            Impact factor:   1.872


  4 in total

1.  Potential curability and perception of received information in esophageal cancer patients.

Authors:  Eleonora Pinto; Francesco Cavallin; Luca Maria Saadeh; Maria Cristina Bellissimo; Rita Alfieri; Silvia Mantoan; Matteo Cagol; Carlo Castoro; Marco Scarpa
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  The Effect of Multidisciplinary Team Discussion Intervention on the Prognosis of Advanced Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Huaqi Zhang; Jishang Yu; Zhewei Wei; Wenhui Wu; Changhua Zhang; Yulong He
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 4.207

3.  Health Professionals' Views on Key Enabling Factors and Barriers of National Multidisciplinary Team Meetings in Cancer Care: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Linn Rosell; Jessica Wihl; Mef Nilbert; Marlene Malmström
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2020-02-14

Review 4.  Benefits and drawbacks of videoconferencing for collaborating multidisciplinary teams in regional oncology networks: a scoping review.

Authors:  Lidia S van Huizen; Pieter U Dijkstra; Sjoukje van der Werf; Kees Ahaus; Jan Ln Roodenburg
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.