Literature DB >> 2528826

A prospective, randomized, double-blind evaluation of trigger-point injection therapy for low-back pain.

T A Garvey1, M R Marks, S W Wiesel.   

Abstract

The efficacy of trigger-point injection therapy in treatment of low-back strain was evaluated in a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. The patient population consisted of 63 individuals with low-back strain. Patients with this diagnosis had nonradiating low-back pain, normal neurologic examination, absence of tension signs, and lumbosacral roentgenograms interpreted as being within normal limits. They were treated conservatively for 4 weeks before entering the study. Injection therapy was of four different types: lidocaine, lidocaine combined with a steroid, acupuncture, and vapocoolant spray with acupressure. Results indicated that therapy without injected medication (63% improvement rate) was at least as effective as therapy with drug injection (42% improvement rate), at a P value of 0.09. Trigger-point therapy seems to be a useful adjunct in treatment of low-back strain. The injected substance apparently is not the critical factor, since direct mechanical stimulus to the trigger-point seems to give symptomatic relief equal to that of treatment with various types of injected medication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2528826     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198909000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  26 in total

Review 1.  Muscle pain due to injury.

Authors:  A H Wheeler; G W Aaron
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2001-10

2.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and safety of selected complementary and alternative medicine for neck and low-back pain.

Authors:  Andrea D Furlan; Fatemeh Yazdi; Alexander Tsertsvadze; Anita Gross; Maurits Van Tulder; Lina Santaguida; Joel Gagnier; Carlo Ammendolia; Trish Dryden; Steve Doucette; Becky Skidmore; Raymond Daniel; Thomas Ostermann; Sophia Tsouros
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 2.629

Review 3.  Outcome of invasive treatment modalities on back pain and sciatica: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Maurits W van Tulder; Bart Koes; Seppo Seitsalo; Antti Malmivaara
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Mechanical low back pain--a rheumatologist's view.

Authors:  David Borenstein
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 20.543

5.  Effect of dry needling of gluteal muscles on straight leg raise: a randomised, placebo controlled, double blind trial.

Authors:  L Huguenin; P D Brukner; P McCrory; P Smith; H Wajswelner; K Bennell
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 6.  Non-Specific Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Jean-François Chenot; Bernhard Greitemann; Bernd Kladny; Frank Petzke; Michael Pfingsten; Susanne Gabriele Schorr
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2017-12-25       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 7.  Myofascial pain disorders: theory to therapy.

Authors:  Anthony H Wheeler
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 8.  Low back pain.

Authors:  A Frank
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-04-03

Review 9.  Injection therapy for subacute and chronic low-back pain.

Authors:  J Bart Staal; Rob de Bie; Henrica Cw de Vet; Jan Hildebrandt; Patty Nelemans
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-07-16

Review 10.  Myofascial low back pain.

Authors:  Ryan R Ramsook; Gerard A Malanga
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2012-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.