Literature DB >> 25288200

To what extent psychiatric patients feel involved in decision making about their mental health care? Relationships with socio-demographic, clinical, and psychological variables.

Carlos De las Cuevas1, Wenceslao Peñate2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Shared decision making (SDM) is an essential component of patient-centered care, but there is little information about its use in the psychiatric care.
OBJECTIVE: To measure to what extent psychiatric patients feel they were involved in the process and steps of decision making about treatment choice and to analyse the influence of socio-demographic, clinical, and psychological processes on this perception.
METHODS: Cross-sectional survey involving 1100 consecutive psychiatric outpatients invited to complete the nine-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9), health locus of control and control preferences, self-efficacy and drug attitude scales, as well as a questionnaire including socio-demographic and clinical variables.
RESULTS: A high response rate of 77% was registered, resulting in a sample of 846 psychiatric outpatients. SDM-Q-9 total score indicate a moderately low degree of perceived participation, with differing perceived implementation of the individual the SDM process steps. Patient diagnosis evidenced significant differences in SDM perception. Patients' perception of SDM was explained by four main variables: the older the patient, the lower self-reported SDM; having a diagnosis of schizophrenia increases the likelihood of lower SDM; a positive attitude towards psychiatric drugs favors greater SDM, as well as a higher level of self-efficacy.
CONCLUSION: The result of this study suggests that SDM is currently not widely practiced in psychiatric care. Further research is needed to examine if the low level of participation self-reported is justified by psychiatric patients' decisional capacity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25288200     DOI: 10.1017/neu.2014.21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neuropsychiatr        ISSN: 0924-2708            Impact factor:   3.403


  11 in total

1.  How are patient-related characteristics associated with shared decision-making about treatment? A scoping review of quantitative studies.

Authors:  Sascha M Keij; Joyce E de Boer; Anne M Stiggelbout; Wändi Bruine de Bruin; Ellen Peters; Saïda Moaddine; Marleen Kunneman; Arwen H Pieterse
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 3.006

2.  Assessment of shared decision-making in community mental health care: Validation of the CollaboRATE.

Authors:  Carlos De Las Cuevas; Ingunn Mundal; Moisés Betancort; Mariela L Lara-Cabrera
Journal:  Int J Clin Health Psychol       Date:  2020-08-01

3.  Treatment engagement of individuals experiencing mental illness: review and update.

Authors:  Lisa B Dixon; Yael Holoshitz; Ilana Nossel
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 49.548

4.  Treatment-related decisional conflict in patients with depressive and anxious disorders.

Authors:  Carlos De Las Cuevas; Ramsés Marrero; Casimiro Cabrera
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 2.711

5.  Treatment alliance and adherence in bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Subho Chakrabarti
Journal:  World J Psychiatry       Date:  2018-11-09

6.  Socio-economic differences in patient participation behaviours in doctor-patient interactions-A systematic mapping review of the literature.

Authors:  Sarah Allen; Simon N Rogers; Rebecca V Harris
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Experiences of shared decision making among patients with psychotic disorders in Norway: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Espen W Haugom; Bjørn Stensrud; Gro Beston; Torleif Ruud; Anne S Landheim
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 3.630

8.  Exploring goal planning in mental health service delivery: a systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Victoria Stewart; Sara Sinclair McMillan; Helena Roennfeldt; Sarira El-Den; Ricki Ng; Amanda J Wheeler
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  A thematic analysis assessing clinical decision-making in antipsychotic prescribing for schizophrenia.

Authors:  Rossela Roberts; Abigail Neasham; Chania Lambrinudi; Afshan Khan
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 3.630

10.  Mental health professionals' experiences with shared decision-making for patients with psychotic disorders: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Espen W Haugom; Bjørn Stensrud; Gro Beston; Torleif Ruud; Anne S Landheim
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.