Literature DB >> 25288147

Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta versus darbepoetin alfa for anemia in non-dialysis-dependent CKD: a systematic review.

Noor Alsalimy1, Ahmed Awaisu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anemia management in non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients is associated with cardiovascular and cost benefits, slows decline in renal function, and prevents mortality. Different reviews have focused on evaluating the safety and efficacy of methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta (MPG-EPO), a continuous erythropoietin receptor activator, in CKD patients regardless of dialysis dependency and others have studied this novel agent exclusively in CKD patients receiving dialysis. AIM OF THE REVIEW: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of MPG-EPO compared with other erythropoiesis stimulating agents (in particular darbepoetin alfa) for the treatment of anemia in non-dialysis-dependent CKD patients.
METHODS: A systematic review of original studies published mainly in MEDLINE, Cochrane Database, ScienceDirect, ProQuest, clinical trials registries, and Google Scholar was carried out to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing MPG-EPO with other erythropoiesis stimulating agents or placebo among patients with anemia of CKD who were not yet receiving dialysis. Data were independently extracted by two reviewers using standardized data abstraction tool.
RESULTS: Four trials involving 1,155 patients were included in the review. The changes in hemoglobin level from the baseline reported by the reviewed studies demonstrate that MPG-EPO was clinically non-inferior to darbepoetin alfa. In addition, the studies documented that MPG-EPO-treated patients experienced a lower rate of hemoglobin level above the target range of 12-13 g/dL than darbepoetin-treated patients. The proportion of patients requiring RBC transfusion was higher among patients who received darbepoetin alfa than those who received MPG-EPO. However, the time to hemoglobin response was longer with MPG-EPO than with darbepoetin. Finally, the incidences of serious adverse events were similar between the two therapeutic agents.
CONCLUSION: There are currently only few well-designed head-to-head RCTs investigating the efficacy and safety of MPG-EPO compared with other ESAs in non-dialysis-dependent patients. MPG-EPO therapy compared with darbepoetin alfa has demonstrated favorable effects of increasing and maintaining hemoglobin concentrations to recommended target levels. This mini-review is not conclusive due to limited number of studies. Therefore, the beneficial effects and tolerability of MPG-EPO among non-dialysis-dependent CKD patients should be further investigated, given the economic and clinical benefits of managing anemia in this population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25288147     DOI: 10.1007/s11096-014-0023-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm


  50 in total

Review 1.  Darbepoetin alfa: its use in anemia associated with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Dean M Robinson; Stephanie E Easthope
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.807

Review 2.  External and internal validity of open label or double-blind trials in oral anticoagulation: better, worse or just different?

Authors:  J Beyer-Westendorf; H Büller
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 5.824

3.  The prevalence of anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  William McClellan; Stephen L Aronoff; W Kline Bolton; Sally Hood; Daniel L Lorber; K Linda Tang; Thomas F Tse; Brian Wasserman; Marc Leiserowitz
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.580

4.  Treating anemia early in renal failure patients slows the decline of renal function: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Chariclia Gouva; Petros Nikolopoulos; John P A Ioannidis; Kostas C Siamopoulos
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 10.612

5.  Intravenous methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta for haemoglobin control in patients with chronic kidney disease who are on dialysis: a randomised non-inferiority trial (MAXIMA).

Authors:  Nathan W Levin; Steven Fishbane; Francisco Valdés Cañedo; Steven Zeig; George M Nassar; John E Moran; Giuseppe Villa; Ulrich Beyer; Delphine Oguey
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-10-20       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  A trial of darbepoetin alfa in type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Marc A Pfeffer; Emmanuel A Burdmann; Chao-Yin Chen; Mark E Cooper; Dick de Zeeuw; Kai-Uwe Eckardt; Jan M Feyzi; Peter Ivanovich; Reshma Kewalramani; Andrew S Levey; Eldrin F Lewis; Janet B McGill; John J V McMurray; Patrick Parfrey; Hans-Henrik Parving; Giuseppe Remuzzi; Ajay K Singh; Scott D Solomon; Robert Toto
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Comparative pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of epoetin alfa and epoetin beta.

Authors:  C E Halstenson; M Macres; S A Katz; J R Schnieders; M Watanabe; J T Sobota; P A Abraham
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 6.875

8.  Renoprotection by continuous erythropoietin receptor activator in puromycin aminonucleoside-induced nephrotic syndrome.

Authors:  Ken Aizawa; Satoshi Takeda; Yoshihito Tashiro; Keigo Yorozu; Michinori Hirata; Hirotaka Kanada; Yoshiyuki Moriguchi; Koichi Endo
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 3.754

Review 9.  Extended dosing intervals with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in chronic kidney disease: a review of clinical data.

Authors:  Fernando Carrera; Alex Disney; Manuel Molina
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.992

10.  Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta for anemia with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Naro Ohashi; Yukitoshi Sakao; Hideo Yasuda; Akihiko Kato; Yoshihide Fujigaki
Journal:  Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis       Date:  2012-03-30
View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparative efficacy and safety in ESA biosimilars vs. originators in adults with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Laura Amato; Antonio Addis; Rosella Saulle; Francesco Trotta; Zuzana Mitrova; Marina Davoli
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 3.902

Review 2.  Reviewing the literature, how systematic is systematic?

Authors:  Katie MacLure; Vibhu Paudyal; Derek Stewart
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2016-04-05
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.