Theresa A Hastert1, Shirley A A Beresford2, Lianne Sheppard3, Emily White2. 1. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA University of Michigan Center for Social Epidemiology and Population Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. 2. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. 3. Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Disparities in cancer incidence and mortality have been observed by measures of area-level socioeconomic status (SES); however, the extent to which these disparities are explained by individual SES is unclear. METHODS: Participants included 60 756 men and women in the VITamins And Lifestyle (VITAL) study cohort, aged 50-76 years at baseline (2000-2002) and followed through 2010. We constructed a block group SES index using the 2000 US Census and fit Cox proportional hazards models to estimate the association between area-level SES (by quintile) and total and site-specific cancer incidence and total cancer mortality, with and without household income and individual education in the models. RESULTS: Lower area-level SES was weakly associated with higher total cancer incidence and lower prostate cancer risk, but was not associated with risk of breast cancer. Compared with the highest-SES areas, living in the lowest-SES areas was associated with higher lung (HR: 2.21, 95% CI 1.69 to 2.90) and colorectal cancer incidence (HR: 1.52, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.09) and total cancer mortality (HR: 1.68, 95% CI 1.47 to 1.93). Controlling for individual education and household income weakened the observed associations, but did not eliminate them (lung cancer HR: 1.43, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.91; colorectal cancer HR: 1.35, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.88; cancer mortality HR: 1.28, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.48). CONCLUSIONS: Area-level socioeconomic disparities exist for several cancer outcomes. These differences are not fully explained by individual SES, suggesting area-level factors may play a role. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
BACKGROUND: Disparities in cancer incidence and mortality have been observed by measures of area-level socioeconomic status (SES); however, the extent to which these disparities are explained by individual SES is unclear. METHODS:Participants included 60 756 men and women in the VITamins And Lifestyle (VITAL) study cohort, aged 50-76 years at baseline (2000-2002) and followed through 2010. We constructed a block group SES index using the 2000 US Census and fit Cox proportional hazards models to estimate the association between area-level SES (by quintile) and total and site-specific cancer incidence and total cancer mortality, with and without household income and individual education in the models. RESULTS: Lower area-level SES was weakly associated with higher total cancer incidence and lower prostate cancer risk, but was not associated with risk of breast cancer. Compared with the highest-SES areas, living in the lowest-SES areas was associated with higher lung (HR: 2.21, 95% CI 1.69 to 2.90) and colorectal cancer incidence (HR: 1.52, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.09) and total cancer mortality (HR: 1.68, 95% CI 1.47 to 1.93). Controlling for individual education and household income weakened the observed associations, but did not eliminate them (lung cancer HR: 1.43, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.91; colorectal cancer HR: 1.35, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.88; cancer mortality HR: 1.28, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.48). CONCLUSIONS: Area-level socioeconomic disparities exist for several cancer outcomes. These differences are not fully explained by individual SES, suggesting area-level factors may play a role. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Entities:
Keywords:
CANCER; Cohort studies; Health inequalities; Neighborhood/place; SOCIO-ECONOMIC
Authors: Shannon M Conroy; Christina A Clarke; Juan Yang; Salma Shariff-Marco; Yurii B Shvetsov; Song-Yi Park; Cheryl L Albright; Andrew Hertz; Kristine R Monroe; Laurence N Kolonel; Loïc Le Marchand; Lynne R Wilkens; Scarlett Lin Gomez; Iona Cheng Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2017-01-31 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Jens Klein; Daniel Lüdecke; Kerstin Hofreuter-Gätgens; Margit Fisch; Markus Graefen; Olaf von dem Knesebeck Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2017-04-25 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Catherine E Mosher; Joseph G Winger; Nasser Hanna; Shadia I Jalal; Lawrence H Einhorn; Thomas J Birdas; DuyKhanh P Ceppa; Kenneth A Kesler; Jordan Schmitt; Deborah A Kashy; Victoria L Champion Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2016-07-09 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Diana R Withrow; Amy Berrington de González; Susan Spillane; Neal D Freedman; Ana F Best; Yingxi Chen; Meredith S Shiels Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Shaneda Warren Andersen; William J Blot; Xiao-Ou Shu; Jennifer S Sonderman; Mark Steinwandel; Margaret K Hargreaves; Wei Zheng Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Susanne Singer; Michael Bartels; Susanne Briest; Jens Einenkel; Dietger Niederwieser; Kirsten Papsdorf; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Sophie Künstler; Sabine Taubenheim; Oliver Krauß Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-12-10 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Jennifer M Knight; Karen L Syrjala; Navneet S Majhail; Michael Martens; Jennifer Le-Rademacher; Brent R Logan; Stephanie J Lee; Paul B Jacobsen; William A Wood; Heather S L Jim; John R Wingard; Mary M Horowitz; Muneer H Abidi; Mingwei Fei; Laura Rawls; J Douglas Rizzo Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2016-08-23 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Theresa A Hastert; Julie J Ruterbusch; Shirley A A Beresford; Lianne Sheppard; Emily White Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2015-11-22 Impact factor: 4.634