Literature DB >> 25287950

Infections and exposures: reported incidents associated with unsuccessful decontamination of reusable surgical instruments.

P M Southworth1.   

Abstract

Reusable surgical instruments provide a potential route for the transmission of pathogenic agents between patients in healthcare facilities. As such, the decontamination process between uses is a vital component in the prevention of healthcare-associated infections. This article reviews reported outbreaks and incidents associated with inappropriate, inadequate, or unsuccessful decontamination of surgical instruments, indicating potential pitfalls of decontamination practices worldwide. To the author's knowledge, this is the first review of surgical instrument decontamination failures. Databases of medical literature, Medline and Embase, were searched systematically. Articles detailing incidents associated with unsuccessful decontamination of surgical instruments were identified. Twenty-one articles were identified reporting incidents associated with failures in decontamination. A large proportion of incidents involved the attempted disinfection, rather than sterilization, of surgical instruments (43% of articles), counter to a number of national guidelines. Instruments used in eye surgery were most frequently reported to be associated with decontamination failures (29% of articles). Of the few articles detailing potential or confirmed pathogenic transmission, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Mycobacterium spp. were most represented. One incident of possible variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease transmission was also identified. Limitations of analysing only published incidents mean that the likelihood of under-reporting (including reluctance to publish failure) must be considered. Despite these limitations, the small number of articles identified suggests a relatively low risk of cross-infection through reusable surgical instruments when cleaning/sterilization procedures are adhered to. The diverse nature of reported incidents also suggests that failures are not systemic.
Copyright © 2014 The Healthcare Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease; Mycobacterium; Ophthalmic instruments; Pseudomonas; Sterilization; Surgical instruments

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25287950     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2014.08.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hosp Infect        ISSN: 0195-6701            Impact factor:   3.926


  5 in total

1.  Reprocessing, CDC, and IPs: LEVERAGING PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICES AND RESOURCES FOR STERILIZATION AND HIGH-LEVEL DISINFECTION OF MEDICAL DEVICES.

Authors:  Matthew J Stuckey; Isaac Benowitz
Journal:  Prev Strateg       Date:  2019

2.  Slit lamps and lenses: a potential source of nosocomial infections?

Authors:  Bianka Sobolewska; Michael Buhl; Jan Liese; Focke Ziemssen
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 3.  Current State of Surgical Lighting.

Authors:  Jahnavi Curlin; Charles K Herman
Journal:  Surg J (N Y)       Date:  2020-06-19

4.  Influence of Fine Management Combined With PDCA Cycle Method on Disinfection Qualified Rate and Performance Grade of Ophthalmic Precision Instruments.

Authors:  Fanli Zeng; Xiuling Wang; Yan Gao; Ling Hu
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-15

5.  Failure of sterilization in a dental outpatient facility: Investigation, risk assessment, and management.

Authors:  N Chanchareonsook; M L Ling; Q X Sim; K H Teoh; K Tan; B H Tan; K Y Fong; C Y Poon
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 1.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.