Literature DB >> 25287365

Insights into the structural determinants of substrate specificity and activity in mouse aldehyde oxidases.

Nuno M F S A Cerqueira1, Catarina Coelho, Natércia F Brás, Pedro A Fernandes, Enrico Garattini, Mineko Terao, Maria João Romão, Maria João Ramos.   

Abstract

In this work, a combination of homology modeling and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations was used to investigate the factors that modulate substrate specificity and activity of the mouse AOX isoforms: mAOX1, mAOX2 (previously mAOX3l1), mAOX3 and mAOX4. The results indicate that the AOX isoform structures are highly preserved and even more conserved than the corresponding amino acid sequences. The only differences are at the protein surface and substrate-binding site region. The substrate-binding site of all isoforms consists of two regions: the active site, which is highly conserved among all isoforms, and a isoform-specific region located above. We predict that mAOX1 accepts a broader range of substrates of different shape, size and nature relative to the other isoforms. In contrast, mAOX4 appears to accept a more restricted range of substrates. Its narrow and hydrophobic binding site indicates that it only accepts small hydrophobic substrates. Although mAOX2 and mAOX3 are very similar to each other, we propose the following pairs of overlapping substrate specificities: mAOX2/mAOX4 and mAOX3/mAXO1. Based on these considerations, we propose that the catalytic activity between all isoforms should be similar but the differences observed in the binding site might influence the substrate specificity of each enzyme. These results also suggest that the presence of several AOX isoforms in mouse allows them to oxidize more efficiently a wider range of substrates. This contrasts with the same or other organisms that only express one isoform and are less efficient or incapable of oxidizing the same type of substrates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25287365     DOI: 10.1007/s00775-014-1198-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem        ISSN: 0949-8257            Impact factor:   3.358


  27 in total

1.  Development and testing of a general amber force field.

Authors:  Junmei Wang; Romain M Wolf; James W Caldwell; Peter A Kollman; David A Case
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  The impact of single nucleotide polymorphisms on human aldehyde oxidase.

Authors:  Tobias Hartmann; Mineko Terao; Enrico Garattini; Christian Teutloff; Joshua F Alfaro; Jeffrey P Jones; Silke Leimkühler
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 3.922

3.  Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters.

Authors:  Viktor Hornak; Robert Abel; Asim Okur; Bentley Strockbine; Adrian Roitberg; Carlos Simmerling
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2006-11-15

4.  Volarea - a bioinformatics tool to calculate the surface area and the volume of molecular systems.

Authors:  João V Ribeiro; Juan A C Tamames; Nuno M F S A Cerqueira; Pedro A Fernandes; Maria J Ramos
Journal:  Chem Biol Drug Des       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 2.817

5.  The first mammalian aldehyde oxidase crystal structure: insights into substrate specificity.

Authors:  Catarina Coelho; Martin Mahro; José Trincão; Alexandra T P Carvalho; Maria João Ramos; Mineko Terao; Enrico Garattini; Silke Leimkühler; Maria João Romão
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Unraveling the enigmatic mechanism of L-asparaginase II with QM/QM calculations.

Authors:  Diana S Gesto; Nuno M F S A Cerqueira; Pedro A Fernandes; Maria J Ramos
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 7.  Mammalian molybdo-flavoenzymes, an expanding family of proteins: structure, genetics, regulation, function and pathophysiology.

Authors:  Enrico Garattini; Ralf Mendel; Maria João Romão; Richard Wright; Mineko Terao
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 3.857

8.  Isolation and characterization of the human aldehyde oxidase gene: conservation of intron/exon boundaries with the xanthine oxidoreductase gene indicates a common origin.

Authors:  M Terao; M Kurosaki; S Demontis; S Zanotta; E Garattini
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1998-06-01       Impact factor: 3.857

9.  Identification of crucial amino acids in mouse aldehyde oxidase 3 that determine substrate specificity.

Authors:  Martin Mahro; Natércia F Brás; Nuno M F S A Cerqueira; Christian Teutloff; Catarina Coelho; Maria João Romão; Silke Leimkühler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The mammalian aldehyde oxidase gene family.

Authors:  Enrico Garattini; Maddalena Fratelli; Mineko Terao
Journal:  Hum Genomics       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.639

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Evolution, expression, and substrate specificities of aldehyde oxidase enzymes in eukaryotes.

Authors:  Mineko Terao; Enrico Garattini; Maria João Romão; Silke Leimkühler
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Systematic exploration of predicted destabilizing nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms (nsSNPs) of human aldehyde oxidase: A Bio-informatics study.

Authors:  Catarina Coelho; Jayaraman Muthukumaran; Teresa Santos-Silva; Maria João Romão
Journal:  Pharmacol Res Perspect       Date:  2019-11-22

3.  Direct comparison of the four aldehyde oxidase enzymes present in mouse gives insight into their substrate specificities.

Authors:  Gökhan Kücükgöze; Silke Leimkühler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.