Literature DB >> 25287232

Effectiveness of entecavir treatment and predictive factors for virologic response.

Carmen Monica Preda, Cristian Baicus, Lucian Negreanu, Letitia Tugui, Sandra Viviana Olariu, Adriana Andrei, Ileana Zambatu, Mircea Mihai Diculescu.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Entecavir (ETV) is a potent inhibitor of hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication. In patients adherent to treatment, virologic remission rates of > 95 % can be maintained with entecavir at 3-5 years. AIM AND METHODS: A cohort study was performed, including all subjects who received ETV for chronic hepatitis B, in the South- Eastern Romania. We assessed viral response, HBeAg loss and seroconversion, HBsAg loss and seroconversion, biochemical response. Comparison of categorical data was performed by Chi2-test or Fisher´s exact where applicable.
RESULTS: Data from 533 patients were available: predominantly males (64 %), 82.6 % nucleotide naive, 23.1 % HBe-Ag positive, 78.2 % with elevated ALT, 8 % with cirrhosis. The median follow up was 24 months (range 12-48 months). Rate of undetectable HBV DNA increased constantly from year 1 to 3, reaching 91.2 %. Positive predictive factors for virologic response were low score of fibrosis (p-0.006), low level of HBV DNA (p-0.003), while negative predictive factors were: HBe antigen positive status (p-value < 0.001), prior IFN therapy (p 0.015). Virologic rebound was found in 7.8 % (breakthrough in 0.8 %). Rate of HBe Ag loss increases with the therapy duration, reaching 47.83 % in year 3,with two positive predictive factors: Male sex (p = 0.007), and undetectable HBV DNA at 24 weeks (p = 0.002). The percentage of HBs Ag loss was 1.31 %.
CONCLUSIONS: ETV maintained and even increased the high initial response rate (from 78 % to 91.2 %). Low score of fibrosis, low level of HBV DNA, HBe antigen negative status, absence of prior interferon therapy predict a good virologic response. Virologic rebound was found in a higher rate in our population, due probably to a poor drug compliance. Lamivudine-resistant patients usually respond well to ETV, but 15.62 % are non-responders, suspect of Entecavir resistance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25287232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Esp Enferm Dig        ISSN: 1130-0108            Impact factor:   2.086


  4 in total

1.  Management of entecavir-resistant chronic hepatitis B with adefovir-based combination therapies.

Authors:  Hyoung Su Kim; Hyung Joon Yim; Myoung Kuk Jang; Ji Won Park; Sang Jun Suh; Yeon Seok Seo; Ji Hoon Kim; Bo Hyun Kim; Sang Jong Park; Sae Hwan Lee; Sang Gyune Kim; Young Seok Kim; Jung Il Lee; Jin-Woo Lee; In Hee Kim; Tae Yeob Kim; Jin-Wook Kim; Sook-Hyang Jeong; Young Kul Jung; Hana Park; Seong Gyu Hwang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Extract from Phyllanthus urinaria L. inhibits hepatitis B virus replication and expression in hepatitis B virus transfection model in vitro.

Authors:  Ying Wu; Ying Lu; Shu-yu Li; Yue-han Song; Yu Hao; Qian Wang
Journal:  Chin J Integr Med       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 1.978

3.  Continuous up to 4 Years Entecavir Treatment of HBV-Infected Adolescents - A Longitudinal Study in Real Life.

Authors:  Małgorzata Pawłowska; Krzysztof Domagalski; Beata Smok; Paweł Rajewski; Magdalena Wietlicka-Piszcz; Waldemar Halota; Andrzej Tretyn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Real-world single-center experience with entecavir and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in treatment-naïve and experienced patients with chronic hepatitis B.

Authors:  Young Min Kim; Hyun Phil Shin; Joung Il Lee; Kwang Ro Joo; Jae Myung Cha; Jung Won Jeon; Jin Young Yoon; Min Seob Kwak
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.485

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.