Literature DB >> 25287021

Genome-wide screening of Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes required to foster tolerance towards industrial wheat straw hydrolysates.

Francisco B Pereira1, Miguel C Teixeira, Nuno P Mira, Isabel Sá-Correia, Lucília Domingues.   

Abstract

The presence of toxic compounds derived from biomass pre-treatment in fermentation media represents an important drawback in second-generation bio-ethanol production technology and overcoming this inhibitory effect is one of the fundamental challenges to its industrial production. The aim of this study was to systematically identify, in industrial medium and at a genomic scale, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes required for simultaneous and maximal tolerance to key inhibitors of lignocellulosic fermentations. Based on the screening of EUROSCARF haploid mutant collection, 242 and 216 determinants of tolerance to inhibitory compounds present in industrial wheat straw hydrolysate (WSH) and in inhibitor-supplemented synthetic hydrolysate were identified, respectively. Genes associated to vitamin metabolism, mitochondrial and peroxisomal functions, ribosome biogenesis and microtubule biogenesis and dynamics are among the newly found determinants of WSH resistance. Moreover, PRS3, VMA8, ERG2, RAV1 and RPB4 were confirmed as key genes on yeast tolerance and fermentation of industrial WSH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25287021     DOI: 10.1007/s10295-014-1519-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 1367-5435            Impact factor:   3.346


  34 in total

1.  Development and characterization of an environmentally friendly process sequence (autohydrolysis and organosolv) for wheat straw delignification.

Authors:  Héctor A Ruiz; Denise S Ruzene; Daniel P Silva; Fernando F Macieira da Silva; António A Vicente; José A Teixeira
Journal:  Appl Biochem Biotechnol       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 2.926

Review 2.  Genomic adaptation of ethanologenic yeast to biomass conversion inhibitors.

Authors:  Z Lewis Liu
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2006-10-07       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Transcriptome shifts in response to furfural and acetic acid in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Bing-Zhi Li; Ying-Jin Yuan
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Inhibition effects of furfural on alcohol dehydrogenase, aldehyde dehydrogenase and pyruvate dehydrogenase.

Authors:  Tobias Modig; Gunnar Lidén; Mohammad J Taherzadeh
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 3.857

5.  Genomic expression program involving the Haa1p-regulon in Saccharomyces cerevisiae response to acetic acid.

Authors:  Nuno P Mira; Jorg D Becker; Isabel Sá-Correia
Journal:  OMICS       Date:  2010-10

Review 6.  Adaptive response and tolerance to weak acids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a genome-wide view.

Authors:  Nuno P Mira; Miguel Cacho Teixeira; Isabel Sá-Correia
Journal:  OMICS       Date:  2010-10

Review 7.  Technological trends, global market, and challenges of bio-ethanol production.

Authors:  Solange I Mussatto; Giuliano Dragone; Pedro M R Guimarães; João Paulo A Silva; Lívia M Carneiro; Inês C Roberto; António Vicente; Lucília Domingues; José A Teixeira
Journal:  Biotechnol Adv       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 14.227

8.  Transcriptional profiling of Saccharomyces cerevisiae T2 cells upon exposure to hardwood spent sulphite liquor: comparison to acetic acid, furfural and hydroxymethylfurfural.

Authors:  Paramjit K Bajwa; Chi-Yip Ho; Chi-Kin Chan; Vincent J J Martin; Jack T Trevors; Hung Lee
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 2.271

9.  Quantitative transcription dynamic analysis reveals candidate genes and key regulators for ethanol tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Menggen Ma; Lewis Z Liu
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 3.605

10.  Distinct redox regulation in sub-cellular compartments in response to various stress conditions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Anita Ayer; Julia Sanwald; Bethany A Pillay; Andreas J Meyer; Gabriel G Perrone; Ian W Dawes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Transcriptional profiling reveals molecular basis and novel genetic targets for improved resistance to multiple fermentation inhibitors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Yingying Chen; Jiayuan Sheng; Tao Jiang; Joseph Stevens; Xueyang Feng; Na Wei
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 6.040

Review 2.  Multi-Faceted Systems Biology Approaches Present a Cellular Landscape of Phenolic Compound Inhibition in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Eugene Fletcher; Kristin Baetz
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-10-14

3.  A CRISPR Interference Screen of Essential Genes Reveals that Proteasome Regulation Dictates Acetic Acid Tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Vaskar Mukherjee; Ulrika Lind; Robert P St Onge; Anders Blomberg; Yvonne Nygård
Journal:  mSystems       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 6.496

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.