Literature DB >> 25286323

Structured reporting of multiphasic CT for pancreatic cancer: potential effect on staging and surgical planning.

Olga R Brook1, Alexander Brook, Charles M Vollmer, Tara S Kent, Norberto Sanchez, Ivan Pedrosa.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare structured versus nonstructured reporting of multiphasic computed tomography (CT) for staging of pancreatic cancer and the effects of both types of reporting on subjective assessment of resectability.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant retrospective study with waiver of informed consent included all patients who were referred for presurgical multiphasic CT of the pancreas between December 2006 and April 2011 at one institution before and after implementation (April 2008) of a structured reporting template. The template was created specifically for reporting multiphasic CT results to stage pancreatic cancer in patients and contained specific information relevant to surgical and oncologic planning. Multiphasic CT reports were assessed for the presence of 12 key features required for staging and surgical planning, including location, size, enhancement, node status, and vascular involvement. Three pancreatic surgeons evaluated the reports to assess resectability, surgical planning, and ease of extracting information before and after reviewing the multiphasic CT images blinded to the patient identifiers. The Student t test and χ(2) test were used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: Forty-eight (40%) structured and 72 (60%) nonstructured multiphasic CT reports were reviewed. Nonstructured reports contained a mean ± standard deviation of 7.3 key features ± 2.1 (range, 1-11) and structured reports contained 10.6 ± 0.9 (range, 9-12) features (P < .001). Information for surgical planning was deemed easily accessible in 94%, 60%, and 98% of structured and 47%, 54%, and 32% of nonstructured reports by the three surgeons, respectively (P < .001, .79, < .001). Surgeons had sufficient information for surgical planning in 96%, 69%, and 98% of structured and 31%, 43%, and 25% of nonstructured reports (P < .001, .009, and < .001). When surgeons reviewed reports in combination with multiphasic CT images, they were more likely to convert an answer of "unsure" regarding resectability to a definitive answer (ie, resectable or unresectable) when the reports were structured than when they were nonstructured.
CONCLUSION: Structured reporting of pancreatic multiphasic CT provided superior evaluation of pancreatic cancer and facilitated surgical planning. Surgeons were more confident regarding decisions about tumor resectability when they reviewed structured reports before review of multiphasic CT images. © RSNA, 2014.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25286323     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14140206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  53 in total

1.  Standardized report template for indeterminate renal masses at CT and MRI: a collaborative product of the SAR Disease-Focused Panel on Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Matthew S Davenport; Eric M Hu; Andrew Zhang; Atul B Shinagare; Andrew D Smith; Ivan Pedrosa; Samuel D Kaffenberger; Stuart G Silverman
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2019-04

Review 2.  Does standardised structured reporting contribute to quality in diagnostic pathology? The importance of evidence-based datasets.

Authors:  D W Ellis; J Srigley
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Value of structured reporting in neuromuscular disorders.

Authors:  Francesco Alessandrino; Lara Cristiano; Claudia Maria Cinnante; Tommaso Tartaglione; Simonetta Gerevini; Tommaso Verdolotti; Giovanna Stefania Colafati; Emanuele Ghione; Raimondo Vitale; Lorenzo Peverelli; Claudia Brogna; Angela Berardinelli; Maurizio Moggio; Eugenio M Mercuri; Anna Pichiecchio
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2019-03-09       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Structured reports of videofluoroscopic swallowing studies have the potential to improve overall report quality compared to free text reports.

Authors:  Franziska Schoeppe; Wieland H Sommer; Mareike Haack; Miriam Havel; Marika Rheinwald; Juliane Wechtenbruch; Martin R Fischer; Felix G Meinel; Bastian O Sabel; Nora N Sommer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Development of an IHE MRRT-compliant open-source web-based reporting platform.

Authors:  Daniel Pinto Dos Santos; G Klos; R Kloeckner; R Oberle; C Dueber; P Mildenberger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Joint Consensus Statement of the Indian National Association for Study of the Liver and Indian Radiological and Imaging Association for the Diagnosis and Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Incorporating Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System.

Authors:  Sonal Krishan; Radha K Dhiman; Navin Kalra; Raju Sharma; Sanjay S Baijal; Anil Arora; Ajay Gulati; Anu Eapan; Ashish Verma; Shyam Keshava; Amar Mukund; S Deva; Ravi Chaudhary; Karthick Ganesan; Sunil Taneja; Ujjwal Gorsi; Shivanand Gamanagatti; Kumble S Madhusudan; Pankaj Puri; Shallini Govil; Manav Wadhavan; Sanjiv Saigal; Ashish Kumar; Shallini Thapar; Ajay Duseja; Neeraj Saraf; Anubhav Khandelwal; Sumit Mukhopadyay; Ajay Gulati; Nitin Shetty; Nipun Verma
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2019-08-06

7.  Structured reporting in petrous bone MRI examinations: impact on report completeness and quality.

Authors:  Marco Armbruster; Sebastian Gassenmaier; Mareike Haack; Maximilian Reiter; Dominik Nörenberg; Thomas Henzler; Nora N Sommer; Wieland H Sommer; Franziska Braun
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 2.924

8.  Usage of structured reporting in radiological practice: results from an Italian online survey.

Authors:  Lorenzo Faggioni; Francesca Coppola; Riccardo Ferrari; Emanuele Neri; Daniele Regge
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Resection or repair of large peripancreatic arteries during robotic pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Emanuele F Kauffmann; Niccolò Napoli; Concetta Cacace; Francesca Menonna; Fabio Vistoli; Gabriella Amorese; Ugo Boggi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-02-18

10.  Does Second Reader Opinion Affect Patient Management in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma?

Authors:  Giuseppe Corrias; Sandra Huicochea Castellanos; Ryan Merkow; Russel Langan; Vinod Balachandran; Monica Ragucci; Gabriella Carollo; Marcello Mancini; Luca Saba; Lorenzo Mannelli
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 3.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.