Literature DB >> 25285945

Paired whole cell recordings in organotypic hippocampal slices.

Chantelle Fourie1, Marianna Kiraly2, Daniel V Madison2, Johanna M Montgomery3.   

Abstract

Pair recordings involve simultaneous whole cell patch clamp recordings from two synaptically connected neurons, enabling not only direct electrophysiological characterization of the synaptic connections between individual neurons, but also pharmacological manipulation of either the presynaptic or the postsynaptic neuron. When carried out in organotypic hippocampal slice cultures, the probability that two neurons are synaptically connected is significantly increased. This preparation readily enables identification of cell types, and the neurons maintain their morphology and properties of synaptic function similar to that in native brain tissue. A major advantage of paired whole cell recordings is the highly precise information it can provide on the properties of synaptic transmission and plasticity that are not possible with other more crude techniques utilizing extracellular axonal stimulation. Paired whole cell recordings are often perceived as too challenging to perform. While there are challenging aspects to this technique, paired recordings can be performed by anyone trained in whole cell patch clamping provided specific hardware and methodological criteria are followed. The probability of attaining synaptically connected paired recordings significantly increases with healthy organotypic slices and stable micromanipulation allowing independent attainment of pre- and postsynaptic whole cell recordings. While CA3-CA3 pyramidal cell pairs are most widely used in the organotypic slice hippocampal preparation, this technique has also been successful in CA3-CA1 pairs and can be adapted to any neurons that are synaptically connected in the same slice preparation. In this manuscript we provide the detailed methodology and requirements for establishing this technique in any laboratory equipped for electrophysiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25285945      PMCID: PMC4828138          DOI: 10.3791/51958

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  30 in total

Review 1.  Long-term potentiation--a decade of progress?

Authors:  R C Malenka; R A Nicoll
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-09-17       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  The glutamate receptor ion channels.

Authors:  R Dingledine; K Borges; D Bowie; S F Traynelis
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 25.468

3.  AMPA receptor subunits define properties of state-dependent synaptic plasticity.

Authors:  Michelle R Emond; Johanna M Montgomery; Matthew L Huggins; Jesse E Hanson; Lifang Mao; Richard L Huganir; Daniel V Madison
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 4.  Paired recordings from neurones.

Authors:  R Miles; J C Poncer
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  Paired-pulse facilitation and depression at unitary synapses in rat hippocampus: quantal fluctuation affects subsequent release.

Authors:  D Debanne; N C Guérineau; B H Gähwiler; S M Thompson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1996-02-15       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  SNAP-mediated protein-protein interactions essential for neurotransmitter release.

Authors:  W M DeBello; V O'Connor; T Dresbach; S W Whiteheart; S S Wang; F E Schweizer; H Betz; J E Rothman; G J Augustine
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-02-16       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Glutamate receptor subunit GluA1 is necessary for long-term potentiation and synapse unsilencing, but not long-term depression in mouse hippocampus.

Authors:  Joel C Selcher; Weifeng Xu; Jesse E Hanson; Robert C Malenka; Daniel V Madison
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-19       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Synaptic SAP97 isoforms regulate AMPA receptor dynamics and access to presynaptic glutamate.

Authors:  Clarissa L Waites; Christian G Specht; Kai Härtel; Sergio Leal-Ortiz; David Genoux; Dong Li; Renaldo C Drisdel; Okun Jeyifous; Juliette E Cheyne; William N Green; Johanna M Montgomery; Craig C Garner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Autism-associated mutations in ProSAP2/Shank3 impair synaptic transmission and neurexin-neuroligin-mediated transsynaptic signaling.

Authors:  Magali H Arons; Charlotte J Thynne; Andreas M Grabrucker; Dong Li; Michael Schoen; Juliette E Cheyne; Tobias M Boeckers; Johanna M Montgomery; Craig C Garner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Physiology and pharmacology of unitary synaptic connections between pairs of cells in areas CA3 and CA1 of rat hippocampal slice cultures.

Authors:  D Debanne; N C Guérineau; B H Gähwiler; S M Thompson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  4 in total

1.  Label-free optical detection of bioelectric potentials using electrochromic thin films.

Authors:  Felix S Alfonso; Yuecheng Zhou; Erica Liu; Allister F McGuire; Yang Yang; Husniye Kantarci; Dong Li; Eric Copenhaver; J Bradley Zuchero; Holger Müller; Bianxiao Cui
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Array tomography of physiologically-characterized CNS synapses.

Authors:  Ricardo A Valenzuela; Kristina D Micheva; Marianna Kiraly; Dong Li; Daniel V Madison
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  Protective Effect of Quercetin against Oxidative Stress-Induced Cytotoxicity in Rat Pheochromocytoma (PC-12) Cells.

Authors:  Dengke Bao; Jingkai Wang; Xiaobin Pang; Hongliang Liu
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 4.  Synaptic Plasticity in Cardiac Innervation and Its Potential Role in Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Jesse L Ashton; Rebecca A B Burton; Gil Bub; Bruce H Smaill; Johanna M Montgomery
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 4.566

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.