| Literature DB >> 25285438 |
Angela Dawson1, Nguyen-Toan Tran2, Elizabeth Westley3, Viviana Mangiaterra4, Mario Festin5.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Emergency contraception pills (ECP) are among the 13 essential commodities in the framework for action established by the UN Commission on Life-Saving Commodities for Women and Children. Despite having been on the market for nearly 20 years, a number of barriers still limit women's access to ECP in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) including limited consumer knowledge and poor availability. This paper reports the results of a review to synthesise the current evidence on service delivery strategies to improve access to ECP.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25285438 PMCID: PMC4186851 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109315
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Record retrieved from databases and internet sites.
| Source | Search terms | retrieved | Identified for appraisal |
|
| |||
| PubMed | (Postcoital Contraception[MeSH Terms]) AND Health Services Accessibility[MeSH Terms]) AND Healthcare Delivery[MeSH Terms]) AND Contraceptive Distribution[MeSH Terms]) AND Developing Countries[MeSH Terms]) OR emergency contraception[Title/Abstract]) AND emergency contraceptive pills[Title/Abstract] | 70 | 0 |
| Medline | ((Postcoital Contraception and Health Services Accessibility and Healthcare Delivery and Contraceptive Distribution and Developing Countries).sh. or emergency contraception.ab.) and emergency contraceptive pills.ab. | 45 | 0 |
| SCOPUS | ABS(emergency contraceptive pill) | 233 | 0 |
| ProQuest Health & Medical Complete | ab((emergency contraception OR emergency contraceptive pills)) | 396 | 1 |
| CINHAL | AB emergency contraception | 246 | 0 |
| Web of Science | TOPIC | 439 | |
|
| |||
| Africa Journals On-Line | emergency contraception pill | 23 | 1 |
| Popline | Advanced search 2003–2013 English Emergency contraception research report | 772 | 2 |
| Eldis knowledge services | Emergency contraception | 471 | 2 |
| RHL Reproductive Health Library | Emergency contraception | 10 | 0 |
| The Guttmacher Institute | Emergency contraception | 303 | 0 |
| Population Council | Emergency contraception | 39 | 9 |
| The International Consortium on Emergency Contraception | Emergency contraception | 53 | 8 |
|
| 4 | 2 | |
| Minus duplicates | 9 | ||
| Total | 3104 | 16 |
Figure 1Overview of the literature review process.
Summary of studies included in the Review.
| Reference | Context | Method | Sample/participants | Aim | Findings |
|
| |||||
| (Kassa, Hiwot et al. 2009) | Ethiopia Addis Ababa, hospitals | Mixed methods- Descriptive cross sectional survey of all health facilities in Addis Ababa to assess ECP provision after sexual assault. In-depth interview were conducted with key informants at police stations. | 576 health facilities in Addis Ababa and 4 police stations | To examine the potential barriers to accessing ECP among sexual assault survivors | Five public hospitals and one model clinic (1.04% of all facilities) provide treatment to victims of sexual assault and provide ECP. No private hospital provides treatment. Low police knowledge of ECP and referral usually to model clinic. Lengthy processing times and cost to women make court action difficult. |
| Keesbury, Zama et al. 2009) | Zambia Ndola district | Mixed methods intervention study. Descriptive quantitative: service provision data from police stations, provider KAP survey. Qualitative: focus group discussions and key informant interviews. | 210 police officers were interviewed from 15 police stations and posts, 3 health workers, 1 health official, 3 community members | Assess the feasibility of police provision of ECP | Police can safely and effectively provide ECP. Reporting of sexual violence cases increased by 48% in participating police stations from 2006 to 2007. The program was perceived by provincial management as successful, sustainable and cost-effective. |
| (Khan, Bhattacharya et al. 2008) | India (Delhi, Lucknow, Vadodara) Bangladesh (Dhaka, Chittagong, Sylhet Tangail) | Mixed methods Descriptive quantitative: Survey of providers and open questions | 44 medical practitioners and nurses in public hospitals and 55 police in stations adjacent to medical facilities | To assess post-rape care services available at the first point of contact | No uniform service provision protocol to follow for managing rape survivors at health facilities. |
| (Ononge, Wandabwa et al. 2005) | Mulago Hospital, Kampala, Uganda | Quantitative descriptive study using survey and clinical records | Fifty eight sexually assaulted females were interviewed, examined, given appropriate treatment and followed up for 3 months | To determine the presentation and treatment offered to sexually assaulted females attending emergency gynaecological ward | The mean age was 9.5 with a range of 1–35 years. ECP offered to all women and girls. STIs included trichomonas vaginalis (1.7%) and syphilis (3.7%). All cases received counselling and prophylactic treatment for sexually transmitted infections |
|
| |||||
| (Keesbury, Aytenfisu et al. 2009) | Ethiopia: Addis Ababa, Oromiya, Amhara, SNNPR, and Tigray | Mixed methods intervention study. Descriptive quantitative: Facility data of clients who received ECP may 2006-Dec 2006 and survey of client KAP, survey of providers to assess their experiences with ECP before and after and qualitative interviews held. | 33 facilities and 121 providers from the five regions: nurses (73%) midwives (14%); 3 doctors, health centre clients interviewed, 3999 cases of ECP use | To assess feasibility of expanded access to ECP in the public system. | At start of the project 20% clients had heard of ECP and 0.03% had used ECP. Utilization of ECP steadily increased throughout the project period. Providers were significantly more likely to report a preference to deliver ECP services to adolescent girls than to adolescent boys. Support for expanded access at emergency rooms and police stations, schools and CHWs. |
| (Mahmood and Bin Nisar 2012) | Pakistan DG. Khan, Gawadar, Mansehra, Thatta | Intervention study using quantitative descriptive survey | 193 Lady Health Workers (LHWs), 2,093 married women of reproductive age | To understand and measure retention of knowledge, attitudes and practices of the trained HWs and married women of reproductive age | LHWs (94%) stated the correct answer regarding the use of ECP, <75% stated that they provided the ECP to all the women who required ECP, 47% reported that they did not receive ECP doses from their department on a regular basis, 35% kept a record of the ECP clients, 11% referred their clients to the nearest health facilities for ECP, 87% contacted ECP clients after giving them doses, 81% of women had heard about the ECP, 29% reported ever using ECP. |
| (Shrestha, Hossain et al. 2008) | Nepal: Kathmandu, Bhaktapur and Lalitpur | Mixed methods intervention study. Surveys of providers, facility records, interviews with women, observations of client-provider interactions | 545 service providers, 60 ECP users, 47 client-provider interactions | To describe the introduction of ECP into the national family planning program | Use of ECP was lower than expected during the nine-month intervention period. Limited availability only at health centres. Quality of ECP services was reported to be satisfactory among clients, leaflets shared widely |
|
| |||||
| (Kumar, Shekhar et al. 2007) | India: Meerut (Uttar Pradesh), Jaipur (Rajasthan), and Thane (Maharashtra) | Mixed method intervention study. 2 intervention sites and a control. Service data of women receiving ECP, survey of providers, survey of women and FGDs. | 6 CH Centres per site (2 intervention a, 2 intervention b, 2 control). 146 physicians, 593 paraprofessionals, 409 women in intervention 1, 766 women in 2, two follow-up visits with 316 women | To compare two different ECP delivery models: physicians compared with physicians and paraprofessionals. | Increase in provider and client ECP knowledge in intervention site at 9 months. At 6 months women who received ECP reported level of counselling better among paraprofessionals than physicians. |
|
| |||||
| (Khan and Hossain 2008) | Bangladesh Tangail and Mymensingh, Dhaka division | Mixed method intervention study. Descriptive qualitative: FGDs, KIIs and in depth interviews Descriptive quantitative: Survey of providers, client survey | 36 women 17 men, 54 married women interviewed, 290 providers, 3,900 female clients (1, 300 each from the prophylactic, on-demand and control areas) | To test the relative effectiveness of two alternative service delivery models for providing ECP: on demand vs in advance. | Increase in provider and client knowledge of ECP, study demonstrated high acceptability of ECP. The model providing ECP as a prophylactic was far more successful in meeting the needs of the clients for ECP than the model which provided ECP on-demand after unprotected intercourse occurred. If used correctly, the success rate in avoiding unwanted pregnancy was 99%. |
|
| |||||
| (L'Engle, Vahdat et al. 2013) | Tanzania | Mixed methods. Survey and open questions via text message. | 2870 unique m4RH users during the pilot period | To evaluate the feasibility, reach and potential behavioural impact of providing automated family planning information via mobile phones to the general public | Sixty percent were 29 or younger years in age. ECP was the second most popular method queried. |
Figure 2Approaches to ECP service delivery.
Summary of scaling-up and mainstreaming interventions in studies in the review.
| Key strategies and aim | |
| (Keesbury, Aytenfisu et al. 2009) Ethiopia |
|
|
| |
|
| |
| (Shrestha, Hossain et al. 2008) Nepal |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| (Mahmood and Bin Nisar 2012) Pakistan |
|
|
|
Links between key areas of service delivery, review findings, gaps in knowledge and recommended focus for research.
| Key areas of service delivery focus | Promising strategies based on findings | Gaps in knowledge | Areas for further research |
| Dispensing ECP | Advance provision of ECP. | Needs of vulnerable groups. | How can ECP be made available in public –private partnerships health sector settings? |
| Impact of advance provision of ECP on contraceptive use. | How can ECP programs be tailored to meet the needs of the most vulnerable women? | ||
| Costs to consumer. | What is the role of different sectors of the market? For example public sector/subsidized or free, social marketing/subsidized, commercial sector/not subsidized. | ||
| Role of the private sector. | How can community networks be harnessed for ECP? | ||
| Community based efforts. | What are the most effective user fee exemption fees and waivers for ECP? | ||
| Task shifting/task sharing | ECP delivery by CHWs, paraprofessionals and police. | Provision of ECP information, commodities and counselling in collaboration with other health professionals, social workers, teachers, youth workers etc. | How can effective Intersectoral collaboration be achieved across health education, media and justice sectors? |
| Workforce performance measure. | How can task sharing and collaborative performance be assessed and incentivized? | ||
| Sexual assault service | Police training to dispense ECP and refer to health facilities, provision of sexual assault kits and at police stations and monitoring of activities. | Sustainability of interventions. Best practice protocols and standards across facilities. | What clinical practice guidelines and protocols need to be developed to ensure sexual assault services, information and care are provided at health facilities and how should this be implemented and monitored? |
| Role of other agencies. | How women's shelters and other relevant agencies should be involved in the provision of ECP? | ||
| Information provision | Branding of ECP packets and social marketing through media campaigns. Engagement of decision makers. Mobile phones to deliver ECP information and advice. | Effects of information strategies over time to particular populations. | What social marketing initiatives best increase consumer demand and increase ECP access? |
| Scale up | Including ECP as part of national FP programs. | Costing models and investment cases for ECP, indicators for information gathering and coordination with other health programming | How can existing programs be used as opportunities to scale up ECP? |
| Increase M&E efforts. | What approaches are most cost effective? | ||
| Provider training. | How should ECP components of programs be monitored and evaluated and what impact data should be collected? | ||
| How can ECP delivery be effectively integrated with STI/HIV/MNCH programs? |