Literature DB >> 25285421

Validation of Bacteroidales quantitative PCR assays targeting human and animal fecal contamination in the public and domestic domains in India.

Mitsunori Odagiri1, Alexander Schriewer1, Kaitlyn Hanley1, Stefan Wuertz2, Pravas R Misra3, Pinaki Panigrahi4, Marion W Jenkins5.   

Abstract

We compared host-associated Bacteroidales qPCR assays developed in the continental United States and Europe for the purpose of measuring the effect of improved sanitation on human fecal exposure in rural Indian communities where both human and animal fecal loading are high. Ten candidate Bacteroidales qPCR assays were tested against fecal samples (human, sewage, cow, buffalo, goat, sheep, dog and chicken) from a test set of 30 individual human, 5 sewage, and 60 pooled animal samples collected in coastal Odisha, India. The two universal/general Bacteroidales assays tested (BacUni, GenBac3) performed equally well, achieving 100% sensitivity on the test set. Across the five human-associated assays tested (HF183 Taqman, BacHum, HumM2, BacH, HF183 SYBR), we found low sensitivity (17 to 49%) except for HF183 SYBR (89%), and moderate to high cross-reactivity with dog (20 to 80%) and chicken fecal samples (60 to 100%). BacHum had the highest accuracy (67%), amplified all sewage samples within the range of quantification (ROQ), and did not cross-react with any fecal samples from cows, the most populous livestock animal in India. Of the ruminant- and cattle-associated assays tested (BacCow, CowM2), BacCow was more sensitive in detecting the full range of common Indian livestock animal fecal sources, while CowM2 only detected cow sources with 50% sensitivity. Neither assay cross-reacted with human sources. BacCan, the dog-associated assay tested, showed no cross-reactivity with human sources, and high sensitivity (90%) for dog fecal samples. Overall, our results indicate BacUni, BacHum, HumM2, BacCan and BacCow would be the most suitable MST assays to distinguish and quantify relative amounts of human-associated and livestock/domestic animal-associated contributions to fecal contamination in Odisha, India.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bacteroidales; Fecal pollution; India; Microbial source tracking; Quantitative PCR

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25285421     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.09.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  19 in total

1.  Cross-Comparison of Human Wastewater-Associated Molecular Markers in Relation to Fecal Indicator Bacteria and Enteric Viruses in Recreational Beach Waters.

Authors:  B Hughes; D J Beale; P G Dennis; S Cook; W Ahmed
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Drinking Water Safety: Role of Hand Hygiene, Sanitation Facility, and Water System in Semi-Urban Areas of India.

Authors:  Arti Kundu; Woutrina A Smith; Danielle Harvey; Stefan Wuertz
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.345

3.  Host Specificity and Sensitivity of Established and Novel Sewage-Associated Marker Genes in Human and Nonhuman Fecal Samples.

Authors:  Warish Ahmed; Pradip Gyawali; Shuchen Feng; Sandra L McLellan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Distributions of Fecal Markers in Wastewater from Different Climatic Zones for Human Fecal Pollution Tracking in Australian Surface Waters.

Authors:  W Ahmed; J P S Sidhu; K Smith; D J Beale; P Gyawali; S Toze
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Performance Evaluation of Human-Specific Viral Markers and Application of Pepper Mild Mottle Virus and CrAssphage to Environmental Water Samples as Fecal Pollution Markers in the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal.

Authors:  Bikash Malla; Rajani Ghaju Shrestha; Sarmila Tandukar; Jeevan B Sherchand; Eiji Haramoto
Journal:  Food Environ Virol       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Ecological and Technical Mechanisms for Cross-Reaction of Human Fecal Indicators with Animal Hosts.

Authors:  Shuchen Feng; Warish Ahmed; Sandra L McLellan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Human and Animal Fecal Contamination of Community Water Sources, Stored Drinking Water and Hands in Rural India Measured with Validated Microbial Source Tracking Assays.

Authors:  Alexander Schriewer; Mitsunori Odagiri; Stefan Wuertz; Pravas R Misra; Pinaki Panigrahi; Thomas Clasen; Marion W Jenkins
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 2.345

8.  Evaluation of Low-Cost Phage-Based Microbial Source Tracking Tools for Elucidating Human Fecal Contamination Pathways in Kolkata, India.

Authors:  Renuka Kapoor; James Ebdon; Ashutosh Wadhwa; Goutam Chowdhury; Yuke Wang; Suraja J Raj; Casey Siesel; Sarah E Durry; Wolfgang Mairinger; Asish K Mukhopadhyay; Suman Kanungo; Shanta Dutta; Christine L Moe
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  The Use of Ribosomal RNA as a Microbial Source Tracking Target Highlights the Assay Host-Specificity Requirement in Water Quality Assessments.

Authors:  Annastiina Rytkönen; Ananda Tiwari; Anna-Maria Hokajärvi; Sari Uusheimo; Asko Vepsäläinen; Tiina Tulonen; Tarja Pitkänen
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Human fecal and pathogen exposure pathways in rural Indian villages and the effect of increased latrine coverage.

Authors:  Mitsunori Odagiri; Alexander Schriewer; Miles E Daniels; Stefan Wuertz; Woutrina A Smith; Thomas Clasen; Wolf-Peter Schmidt; Yujie Jin; Belen Torondel; Pravas R Misra; Pinaki Panigrahi; Marion W Jenkins
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 11.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.