Literature DB >> 25285375

Microsaccade-related brain potentials signal the focus of visuospatial attention.

Susann Meyberg1, Markus Werkle-Bergner2, Werner Sommer3, Olaf Dimigen4.   

Abstract

Covert shifts of visuospatial attention are traditionally assumed to occur in the absence of oculomotor behavior. In contrast, recent behavioral studies have linked attentional cueing effects to the occurrence of microsaccades, small eye movements executed involuntarily during attempted fixation. Here we used a new type of electrophysiological marker to explore the attention-microsaccade relationship, the visual brain activity evoked by the microsaccade itself. By shifting the retinal image, microsaccades frequently elicit neural responses throughout the visual pathway, scalp-recordable in the human EEG as a microsaccade-related potential (mSRP). Although mSRPs contain similar signal components (P1/N1) as traditional visually-evoked potentials (VEPs), it is unknown whether they are also influenced by cognition. Based on established findings that VEPs are amplified for visual inputs at currently attended locations, we expected a selective gain-modulation also for mSRPs. Eye movements and EEG were coregistered in a classic spatial cueing task with an endogenous cue. Replicating behavioral findings, the direction of early microsaccades 200-400ms after cue onset was biased towards the cued side. However, for microsaccades throughout the cue-target interval, mSRPs were systematically enhanced at occipital scalp sites contralateral to the cued hemifield. This attention effect resembled that in a control condition with VEPs and did not interact with the direction of the underlying microsaccade, suggesting that mSRPs reflect the focus of sustained visuospatial attention, which remains fixed at the cued location, despite microsaccades. Microsaccades are not merely an artifact source in the EEG; instead, they are followed by cognitively modulated brain potentials that can serve as non-intrusive electrophysiological probes of attention.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; Fixational eye movements; P1; Posner cueing; Saccade-related potential; Visual attention

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25285375     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.09.065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  8 in total

1.  Pattern reinstatement and attentional control overlap during episodic long-term memory retrieval.

Authors:  Melinda Sabo; Daniel Schneider
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Functional but not obligatory link between microsaccades and neural modulation by covert spatial attention.

Authors:  Baiwei Liu; Anna C Nobre; Freek van Ede
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 17.694

3.  Antagonistic Interactions Between Microsaccades and Evidence Accumulation Processes During Decision Formation.

Authors:  Gerard M Loughnane; Daniel P Newman; Sarita Tamang; Simon P Kelly; Redmond G O'Connell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Neural Differences between Covert and Overt Attention Studied using EEG with Simultaneous Remote Eye Tracking.

Authors:  Louisa V Kulke; Janette Atkinson; Oliver Braddick
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Classification of Targets and Distractors Present in Visual Hemifields Using Time-Frequency Domain EEG Features.

Authors:  Deepak Joshi; B K Panigrahi; Sneh Anand; Jayasree Santhosh
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 2.682

6.  Regression-based analysis of combined EEG and eye-tracking data: Theory and applications.

Authors:  Olaf Dimigen; Benedikt V Ehinger
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Microsaccadic rate signatures correlate under monocular and binocular stimulation conditions.

Authors:  Peter Essig; Alexander Leube; Katharina Rifai; Siegfried Wahl
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 0.957

8.  A structured ICA-based process for removing auditory evoked potentials.

Authors:  Jessica M Ross; Recep A Ozdemir; Shu Jing Lian; Peter J Fried; Eva M Schmitt; Sharon K Inouye; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Mouhsin M Shafi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 4.996

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.