Literature DB >> 25285190

Imaging and modification of the tumor vascular barrier for improvement in magnetic nanoparticle uptake and hyperthermia treatment efficacy.

P Jack Hoopes1, Alicia A Petryk2, Jennifer A Tate2, Mark S Savellano3, Rendall R Strawbridge3, Andrew J Giustini1, Radu V Stan3, Barjor Gimi3, Michael Garwood4.   

Abstract

The predicted success of nanoparticle based cancer therapy is due in part to the presence of the inherent leakiness of the tumor vascular barrier, the so called enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect. Although the EPR effect is present in varying degrees in many tumors, it has not resulted in the consistent level of nanoparticle-tumor uptake enhancement that was initially predicted. Magnetic/iron oxide nanoparticles (mNPs) have many positive qualities, including their inert/nontoxic nature, the ability to be produced in various sizes, the ability to be activated by a deeply penetrating and nontoxic magnetic field resulting in cell-specific cytotoxic heating, and the ability to be successfully coated with a wide variety of functional coatings. However, at this time, the delivery of adequate numbers of nanoparticles to the tumor site via systemic administration remains challenging. Ionizing radiation, cisplatinum chemotherapy, external static magnetic fields and vascular disrupting agents are being used to modify the tumor environment/vasculature barrier to improve mNP uptake in tumors and subsequently tumor treatment. Preliminary studies suggest use of these modalities, individually, can result in mNP uptake improvements in the 3-10 fold range. Ongoing studies show promise of even greater tumor uptake enhancement when these methods are combined. The level and location of mNP/Fe in blood and normal/tumor tissue is assessed via histopathological methods (confocal, light and electron microscopy, histochemical iron staining, fluorescent labeling, TEM) and ICP-MS. In order to accurately plan and assess mNP-based therapies in clinical patients, a noninvasive and quantitative imaging technique for the assessment of mNP uptake and biodistribution will be necessary. To address this issue, we examined the use of computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and Sweep Imaging With Fourier Transformation (SWIFT), an MRI technique which provides a positive iron contrast enhancement and a reduced signal to noise ratio, for effective observation and quantification of Fe/mNP concentrations in the clinical setting.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EPR effect; Imaging; Magnetic nanoparticle; Tumor vascular modification

Year:  2013        PMID: 25285190      PMCID: PMC4182929          DOI: 10.1117/12.2008689

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng        ISSN: 0277-786X


  13 in total

1.  SWIFT detection of SPIO-labeled stem cells grafted in the myocardium.

Authors:  Rong Zhou; Djaudat Idiyatullin; Steen Moeller; Curt Corum; Hualei Zhang; Hui Qiao; Jia Zhong; Michael Garwood
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Iron oxide nanoparticle hyperthermia and chemotherapy cancer treatment.

Authors:  Aa Petryk; Aj Giustini; P Ryan; Rr Strawbridge; Pj Hoopes
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2009-02-23

3.  Iron Oxide Hyperthermia And Radiation Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Sm Cassim; Aj Giustini; Aa Petryk; Ra Strawbridge; Pj Hoopes
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2009-02-23

Review 4.  The unique characteristics of tumor vasculature and preclinical evidence for its selective disruption by Tumor-Vascular Disrupting Agents.

Authors:  Dietmar W Siemann
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 12.111

5.  Taxane-induced apoptosis decompresses blood vessels and lowers interstitial fluid pressure in solid tumors: clinical implications.

Authors:  G Griffon-Etienne; Y Boucher; C Brekken; H D Suit; R K Jain
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1999-08-01       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Comparison of microwave and magnetic nanoparticle hyperthermia radiosensitization in murine breast tumors.

Authors:  Andrew J Giustini; Alicia A Petryk; P Jack Hoopes
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2011-02-22

7.  Coadministration of a tumor-penetrating peptide enhances the efficacy of cancer drugs.

Authors:  Kazuki N Sugahara; Tambet Teesalu; Priya Prakash Karmali; Venkata Ramana Kotamraju; Lilach Agemy; Daniel R Greenwald; Erkki Ruoslahti
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Targeting of systemically-delivered magnetic nanoparticle hyperthermia using a noninvasive, static, external magnetic field.

Authors:  Grayson D Zulauf; B Stuart Trembly; Andrew J Giustini; Brian R Flint; Rendall R Strawbridge; P Jack Hoopes
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2013-02-03

9.  Ionizing radiation increases systemic nanoparticle tumor accumulation.

Authors:  Andrew J Giustini; Alicia A Petryk; P Jack Hoopes
Journal:  Nanomedicine       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 5.307

10.  Improved delivery of magnetic nanoparticles with chemotherapy cancer treatment.

Authors:  Alicia A Petryk; Andrew J Giustini; Rachel E Gottesman; P Jack Hoopes
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2013-02-26
View more
  1 in total

1.  Spectroscopic AC Susceptibility Imaging (sASI) of Magnetic Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Bradley W Ficko; Priyanka M Nadar; Solomon G Diamond
Journal:  J Magn Magn Mater       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 2.993

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.