| Literature DB >> 25285038 |
Yaozong Zhang1, Nan Su2, Fengtao Luo2, Xuan Wen2, Yubin Tang2, Jing Yang2, Siyu Chen2, Wanling Jiang2, Xiaolan Du2, Lin Chen2.
Abstract
Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) contribute to neovascularization and vascular repair, and may exert a beneficial effect on the clinical outcome of sepsis. Osteoblasts act as a component of "niche" in bone marrow, which provides a nest for stem/progenitor cells and are involved in the formation and maintenance of stem/progenitor cells. Fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) can regulate osteoblast activity and influence bone mass. So we explored the role of FGFR1 in EPC mobilization. Male mice with osteoblast-specific knockout of Fgfr1 (Fgfr1(fl/fl);OC-Cre) and its wild-type littermates (Fgfr1(fl/fl) ) were used in this study. Mice intraperitoneally injected with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) were used to measure the number of circulating EPCs in peripheral blood and serum stromal cell-derived factor 1α (SDF-1α). The circulating EPC number and the serum level of SDF-1α were significantly higher in Fgfr1(fl/fl);OC-Cre mice than those in Fgfr1(fl/fl) mice after LPS injection. In cell culture system, SDF-1α level was also significantly higher in Fgfr1(fl/fl);OC-Cre osteoblasts compared with that in Fgfr1(fl/fl) osteoblasts after LPS treatment. TRAP staining showed that there was no significant difference between the osteoclast activity of septic Fgfr1(fl/fl) and Fgfr1(fl/fl);OC-Cre mice. This study suggests that targeted deletion of Fgfr1 in osteoblasts enhances mobilization of EPCs into peripheral blood through up-regulating SDF-1α secretion from osteoblasts.Entities:
Keywords: EPCs; Endotoxemia; FGFR1; LPS; Osteoblast; SDF-1α.
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25285038 PMCID: PMC4183926 DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.8415
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Biol Sci ISSN: 1449-2288 Impact factor: 6.580
Figure 1Percentage of circulating EPCs in PBMCs is higher in LPS treated Fgfr1 mice. (A) Flow cytometry analysis of CD34/VEGFR-2 double-positive cells in PBMCs from LPS treated Fgfr1and Fgfr1 mice for 0h, 12h, 24h, 48h and 1w. Both CD34 and VEGFR-2 are as the markers of EPCs. (B) Percentage of circulating EPCs in PBMCs at different time points after LPS treatment. There was no significant difference between the percentage of circulating EPC number in Fgfr1and Fgfr1 mice before LPS treating. Circulating EPC percentages in both types of mice were increased after LPS treatment for several hours. The EPC percentage in Fgfr1 PBMCs was still higher than that in Fgfr1PBMCs at all-time points. Graphs show mean value ± SD. (Student's t-test, *p <0.05, **p <0.01).
Figure 2There is no remarkable difference between osteoclast number and activity in septic Fgfr1 and Fgfr1 mice. (A-B) TRAP staining and osteoclast quantification of tibiae from LPS treated mice and un-treated mice. Osteoclast number in Fgfr1 mice was fewer than that in Fgfr1mice before LPS treatment (0h). Both of osteoclast numbers were increased significantly after LPS treatment for 48h, however, there was no significant difference between osteoclast number in two types of mice after LPS treatment. (C) Serum TRAP5b analysis using ELISA method at different time points after LPS treatment. Serum TRAP5b in Fgfr1mice was higher than that in Fgfr1 mice before LPS injection (0h). Serum TRAP5b were both increased in Fgfr1and Fgfr1 mice after LPS injection, but there were no remarkable differences between two groups at each time point. Graphs show mean value ± SD. (Student's t-test, *p <0.05).
Figure 3The level of SDF-1α is higher in serum and osteoblasts from Fgfr1 mice after LPS treatment. (A) Serum SDF-1α level was significantly higher in LPS treated Fgfr1 mice than Fgfr1mice. (B-E) SDF-1α mRNA level in osteoblasts and protein level in supernatant after osteoblast treated by 1ng/ml and 10ng/ml LPS. The SDF-1α levels of Fgfr1osteoblasts were significantly higher than those in Fgfr1 osteoblasts at all time points after LPS treatment. Graphs show mean value ± SD. (Student's t-test, *p <0.05, **p <0.01).
Figure 4SDF-1α promotes EPC migration. (A-B) Identification of EPCs. Flow cytometry was used to analyze cultured EPCs from bone marrow, and about 82.5% of cells were EPCs (A). Characteristic spindle-shaped EPCs (left panel) was also identified by double labeling using FITC-lectin binding (green) and Dil-LDL uptake (red). Double positive cells were identified as EPCs (yellow). (C-D) Directed migration of EPC responsing to SDF-1α was performed using a modified Boyden chamber. Migrated EPCs were stained using H&E staining. SDF-1α promoted the number of migrated EPCs. Stimulation with different concentrations of SDF-1α (1, 10 and 100 ng/ml) showed a modest but significant EPC migration. Higher SDF-1α concentration led to higher migrated EPC numbers. Graphs show mean value ± SD. (Student's t-test, a, p <0.05; b, p <0.05; c, p <0.001.).