Sir,We read your article about primary hydatid cyst of the soft tissue.[1] Based on our previous observations about the issue[2] we would like to ask two questions in order to comment on and contribute to your work.Comment: In your paper there exists the statment of “Humans acquire the infection; by ingesting eggs of E. Granulosus in contaminated food result of close contact with dogs and sheep.” However, close contact with sheep's does not result in E. granulosis infection.Contribution: Being aware of the hydatid cyst lesion before the surgical procedure may be useful for the risk of anaphylactoid reaction. On the other hand, there has not been any case report up to date mentioning about anaphylactoid reaction of subcutaneous hydatid cyst during surgical procedure. Most of the case reports state that the hydatid disease diagnosis were made postoperatively.[2] Surgical excision is the most common treatment option. Percutaneous treatment is applied to only two cases in India and the results are yet far away from being clear.[3]Questions: Were serologic tests performed for the patient before or after the treatment? Were there any morbidity event (allergy, anaphylaxis, etc.) during or after the surgical procedure?