Literature DB >> 25284373

Overestimation of the Legionella spp. load in environmental samples by quantitative real-time PCR: pretreatment with propidium monoazide as a tool for the assessment of an association between Legionella concentration and sanitary risk.

Savina Ditommaso1, Elisa Ricciardi2, Monica Giacomuzzi2, Susan R Arauco Rivera2, Adriano Ceccarelli3, Carla M Zotti2.   

Abstract

Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) offers rapid, sensitive, and specific detection of Legionella in environmental water samples. In this study, qPCR and qPCR combined with propidium monoazide (PMA-qPCR) were both applied to hot-water system samples and compared to traditional culture techniques. In addition, we evaluated the ability of PMA-qPCR to monitor the efficacy of different disinfection strategies. Comparison between the quantification obtained by culture and by qPCR or PMA-qPCR on environmental water samples confirms that the concentration of Legionella estimated by GU/L is generally higher than that estimated in CFU/L. Our results on 57 hot-water-system samples collected from 3 different sites show that: i) qPCR results were on average 178-fold higher than the culture results (Δ log10=2.25), ii) PMA-qPCR results were on average 27-fold higher than the culture results (Δ log10=1.43), iii) propidium monoazide-induced signal reduction in qPCR were nearly 10-fold (Δ log10=0.95), and that iv) different degrees of correlations between the 3 methods might be explained by different matrix properties, but also by different disinfection methods affecting cultivability of Legionella. In our study, we calculated the logarithmic differences between the results obtained by PMA-qPCR and those obtained by culture, and we suggested an algorithm for the interpretation of PMA-qPCR results for the routine monitoring of healthcare water systems using a commercial qPCR system (iQ-check real-time PCR kit; Bio-Rad, Marnes-la-Coquette, France).
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colony count; Legionella spp; PCR (polymerase chain reaction); Propidium monoazide; Sensitivity and specificity; Water microbiology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25284373     DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2014.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0732-8893            Impact factor:   2.803


  6 in total

1.  On-filter direct amplification of Legionella pneumophila for rapid assessment of its abundance and viability.

Authors:  Farag A Samhan; Tiffany M Stedtfeld; Hassan Waseem; Maggie R Williams; Robert D Stedtfeld; Syed A Hashsham
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 11.236

2.  Comparing methods of determining Legionella spp. in complex water matrices.

Authors:  Álvaro Díaz-Flores; Juan Carlos Montero; Francisco Javier Castro; Eva María Alejandres; Carmen Bayón; Inmaculada Solís; Roberto Fernández-Lafuente; Guillermo Rodríguez
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 3.605

3.  Cultural and Molecular Evidence of Legionella spp. Colonization in Dental Unit Waterlines: Which Is the Best Method for Risk Assessment?

Authors:  Savina Ditommaso; Monica Giacomuzzi; Elisa Ricciardi; Carla M Zotti
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 4.  Determination of viable legionellae in engineered water systems: Do we find what we are looking for?

Authors:  Alexander K T Kirschner
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 11.236

5.  From Lab to Lake - Evaluation of Current Molecular Methods for the Detection of Infectious Enteric Viruses in Complex Water Matrices in an Urban Area.

Authors:  Mats Leifels; Ibrahim Ahmed Hamza; Marion Krieger; Michael Wilhelm; Martin Mackowiak; Lars Jurzik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Viability of Legionella pneumophila in Water Samples: A Comparison of Propidium Monoazide (PMA) Treatment on Membrane Filters and in Liquid.

Authors:  Sara Bonetta; Cristina Pignata; Silvia Bonetta; Lorenza Meucci; Donatella Giacosa; Elena Marino; Giorgio Gilli; Elisabetta Carraro
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.