Mathew P White1, Benedict W Wheeler2, Stephen Herbert3, Ian Alcock2, Michael H Depledge2. 1. European Centre for Environment and Human Health, University of Exeter Medical School, UK. Electronic address: mathew.white@exeter.ac.uk. 2. European Centre for Environment and Human Health, University of Exeter Medical School, UK. 3. Natural England, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent findings suggest that individuals living near the coast are healthier than those living inland. Here we investigated whether this may be related to higher levels of physical activity among coastal dwellers in England, arising in part as a result of more visits to outdoor coastal settings. METHOD: Participants (n=183,755) were drawn from Natural England's Monitor of Engagement with the Natural Environment Survey (2009-2012). Analyses were based on self-reported physical activity for leisure and transport. RESULTS: A small, but significant coastal proximity gradient was seen for the likelihood of achieving recommended guidelines of physical activity a week after adjusting for relevant area and individual level controls. This effect was statistically mediated by the likelihood of having visited the coast in the last seven days. Stratification by region, however, suggested that while the main effect was relatively strong for west coast regions, it was not significant for those in the east. CONCLUSIONS: In general, our findings replicate and extend work from Australia and New Zealand. Further work is needed to explain the marked regional differences in the relationship between coastal proximity and physical activity in England to better understand the coast's potential role as a public health resource.
BACKGROUND: Recent findings suggest that individuals living near the coast are healthier than those living inland. Here we investigated whether this may be related to higher levels of physical activity among coastal dwellers in England, arising in part as a result of more visits to outdoor coastal settings. METHOD:Participants (n=183,755) were drawn from Natural England's Monitor of Engagement with the Natural Environment Survey (2009-2012). Analyses were based on self-reported physical activity for leisure and transport. RESULTS: A small, but significant coastal proximity gradient was seen for the likelihood of achieving recommended guidelines of physical activity a week after adjusting for relevant area and individual level controls. This effect was statistically mediated by the likelihood of having visited the coast in the last seven days. Stratification by region, however, suggested that while the main effect was relatively strong for west coast regions, it was not significant for those in the east. CONCLUSIONS: In general, our findings replicate and extend work from Australia and New Zealand. Further work is needed to explain the marked regional differences in the relationship between coastal proximity and physical activity in England to better understand the coast's potential role as a public health resource.
Authors: Benedict W Wheeler; Rebecca Lovell; Sahran L Higgins; Mathew P White; Ian Alcock; Nicholas J Osborne; Kerryn Husk; Clive E Sabel; Michael H Depledge Journal: Int J Health Geogr Date: 2015-04-30 Impact factor: 3.918
Authors: James Grellier; Mathew P White; Maria Albin; Simon Bell; Lewis R Elliott; Mireia Gascón; Silvio Gualdi; Laura Mancini; Mark J Nieuwenhuijsen; Denis A Sarigiannis; Matilda van den Bosch; Tanja Wolf; Susanne Wuijts; Lora E Fleming Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-06-14 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Antoni Colom; Miguel Fiol; Maurici Ruiz; Montserrat Compa; Marga Morey; Manuel Moñino; Dora Romaguera Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-06-17 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Antoni Colom; Maurici Ruiz; Julia Wärnberg; Montserrat Compa; Josep Muncunill; Francisco Javier Barón-López; Juan Carlos Benavente-Marín; Elena Cabeza; Marga Morey; Montserrat Fitó; Jordi Salas-Salvadó; Dora Romaguera Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-03-08 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Mathew P White; Sabine Pahl; Katherine J Ashbullby; Francesca Burton; Michael H Depledge Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2015-09-23 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Hayley Christian; Matthew Knuiman; Mark Divitini; Sarah Foster; Paula Hooper; Bryan Boruff; Fiona Bull; Billie Giles-Corti Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2017-07-12 Impact factor: 9.031