Hagen Andruszkow1, Frank Hildebrand2, Rolf Lefering3, Hans-Christoph Pape4, Reinhard Hoffmann5, Uwe Schweigkofler6. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Trauma at Aachen University, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany. Electronic address: handruszkow@ukaachen.de. 2. Department of Orthopaedic Trauma at Aachen University, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany. Electronic address: fhildebrand@ukaachen.de. 3. Institute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), University of Witten/Herdecke, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109 Cologne, Germany. Electronic address: Rolf.Lefering@uni-wh.de. 4. Department of Orthopaedic Trauma at Aachen University, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany. Electronic address: hpape@ukaachen.de. 5. Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, BG Unfallklinik, Frankfurt, Germany. Electronic address: aerztlicher.direktor@bgu-frankfurt.de. 6. Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, BG Unfallklinik, Frankfurt, Germany. Electronic address: uwe.schweigkofler@bgu-frankfurt.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) has been established in the preclinical treatment of multiple traumatised patients despite an ongoing controversy towards the potential benefit. Celebrating the 20th anniversary of TraumaRegister DGU(®) of the German Trauma Society (DGU) the presented study intended to provide an overview of HEMS rescue in Germany over the last 10 years analysing the potential beneficial impact of a nationwide helicopter rescue in multiple traumatised patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analysed TraumaRegister DGU(®) including multiple traumatised patients (ISS ≥ 16) between 2002 and 2012. In-hospital mortality was defined as main outcome. An adjusted, multivariate regression with 13 confounders was performed to evaluate the potential survival benefit. RESULTS: 42,788 patients were included in the present study. 14,275 (33.4%) patients were rescued by HEMS and 28,513 (66.6%) by GEMS. Overall, 66.8% (n=28,569) patients were transported to a level I trauma centre and 28.2% (n=12,052) to a level II trauma centre. Patients rescued by HEMS sustained a higher injury severity compared to GEMS (ISS HEMS: 29.5 ± 12.6 vs. ISS GEMS: 27.5 ± 11.8). Helicopter rescue teams performed more on-scene interventions, and mission times were increased in HEMS rescue (HEMS: 77.2 ± 28.7 min. vs. GEMS: 60.9 ± 26.9 min.). Linear regression analysis revealed that the frequency of HEMS rescue has decreased significantly between 2002 and 2012. In case of transportation to level I trauma centres a decrease of 1.7% per year was noted (p<0.001) while a decline of 1.6% per year (p<0.001) was measured for level II trauma centre admissions. According to multivariate logistic regression HEMS was proven a positive independent survival predictor between 2002 and 2012 (OR 0.863; 95%-CI 0.800-0.930; Nagelkerkes-R(2) 0.539) with only little differences between each year. CONCLUSIONS: This study was able to prove an independent survival benefit of HEMS in multiple traumatised patients during the last 10 years. Despite this fact, a constant decline of HEMS rescue missions was found in multiple trauma patients due to unknown reasons. We concluded that HEMS should be used more often in case of trauma in order to guarantee the proven benefit for multiple traumatised patients.
BACKGROUND: Helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) has been established in the preclinical treatment of multiple traumatised patients despite an ongoing controversy towards the potential benefit. Celebrating the 20th anniversary of TraumaRegister DGU(®) of the German Trauma Society (DGU) the presented study intended to provide an overview of HEMS rescue in Germany over the last 10 years analysing the potential beneficial impact of a nationwide helicopter rescue in multiple traumatised patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analysed TraumaRegister DGU(®) including multiple traumatised patients (ISS ≥ 16) between 2002 and 2012. In-hospital mortality was defined as main outcome. An adjusted, multivariate regression with 13 confounders was performed to evaluate the potential survival benefit. RESULTS: 42,788 patients were included in the present study. 14,275 (33.4%) patients were rescued by HEMS and 28,513 (66.6%) by GEMS. Overall, 66.8% (n=28,569) patients were transported to a level I trauma centre and 28.2% (n=12,052) to a level II trauma centre. Patients rescued by HEMS sustained a higher injury severity compared to GEMS (ISS HEMS: 29.5 ± 12.6 vs. ISS GEMS: 27.5 ± 11.8). Helicopter rescue teams performed more on-scene interventions, and mission times were increased in HEMS rescue (HEMS: 77.2 ± 28.7 min. vs. GEMS: 60.9 ± 26.9 min.). Linear regression analysis revealed that the frequency of HEMS rescue has decreased significantly between 2002 and 2012. In case of transportation to level I trauma centres a decrease of 1.7% per year was noted (p<0.001) while a decline of 1.6% per year (p<0.001) was measured for level II trauma centre admissions. According to multivariate logistic regression HEMS was proven a positive independent survival predictor between 2002 and 2012 (OR 0.863; 95%-CI 0.800-0.930; Nagelkerkes-R(2) 0.539) with only little differences between each year. CONCLUSIONS: This study was able to prove an independent survival benefit of HEMS in multiple traumatised patients during the last 10 years. Despite this fact, a constant decline of HEMS rescue missions was found in multiple traumapatients due to unknown reasons. We concluded that HEMS should be used more often in case of trauma in order to guarantee the proven benefit for multiple traumatised patients.
Authors: U Aschenbrenner; S Neppl; F Ahollinger; U Schweigkofler; J O Weigt; M Frank; M Zimmermann; J Braun Journal: Unfallchirurg Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 1.000
Authors: Andreas B Böhmer; Marcel Poels; Kathrin Kleinbrahm; Rolf Lefering; Thomas Paffrath; Bertil Bouillon; Jerome Michel Defosse; Mark U Gerbershagen; Frank Wappler; Robin Joppich Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2016-04-25 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Hagen Andruszkow; Uwe Schweigkofler; Rolf Lefering; Magnus Frey; Klemens Horst; Roman Pfeifer; Stefan Kurt Beckers; Hans-Christoph Pape; Frank Hildebrand Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-01-15 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Urs Pietsch; Jürgen Knapp; Oliver Kreuzer; Ludwig Ney; Giacomo Strapazzon; Volker Lischke; Roland Albrecht; Patrick Phillips; Simon Rauch Journal: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Date: 2018-04-03 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Scott Munro; Mark Joy; Richard de Coverly; Mark Salmon; Julia Williams; Richard M Lyon Journal: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Date: 2018-09-25 Impact factor: 2.953