Geoffrey Waghorn1, Shannon Dias, Beverley Gladman, Meredith Harris, Sukanta Saha. 1. Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research (QCMHR), The Park Centre for Mental Health; Behavioural Basis of Health, Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University; The School of Medicine, The University of Queensland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM: The Individual Placement and Support (IPS) approach is an evidence-based form of supported employment for people with severe and persistent mental illness. This approach is not yet widely available in Australia even though there is mounting evidence of its generalisability outside the USA. One previous Australian randomised controlled trial found that IPS is effective for young people with first episode psychosis. The aim of the current trial was to assess the effectiveness of evidence-based supported employment when implemented for Australian adult consumers of public mental health services by utilising existing service systems. METHODS: A four-site randomised control trial design (n = 208) was conducted in Brisbane (two sites), Townsville and Cairns. The intervention consisted of an IPS supported employment service hosted by a community mental health team. The control condition was delivered at each site by mental health teams referring consumers to other disability employment services in the local area. RESULTS: At 12 months, those in the IPS condition had 2.4 times greater odds of commencing employment than those in the control condition (42.5% vs. 23.5%). The conditions did not differ on secondary employment outcomes including job duration, hours worked, or job diversity. Attrition was higher than expected in both conditions with 28.4% completing the baseline interview but taking no further part in the study. CONCLUSION: The results support previous international findings that IPS-supported employment is more effective than non-integrated supported employment. IPS can be successfully implemented this way in Australia, but with a loss of effect strength compared to previous USA trials.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND/AIM: The Individual Placement and Support (IPS) approach is an evidence-based form of supported employment for people with severe and persistent mental illness. This approach is not yet widely available in Australia even though there is mounting evidence of its generalisability outside the USA. One previous Australian randomised controlled trial found that IPS is effective for young people with first episode psychosis. The aim of the current trial was to assess the effectiveness of evidence-based supported employment when implemented for Australian adult consumers of public mental health services by utilising existing service systems. METHODS: A four-site randomised control trial design (n = 208) was conducted in Brisbane (two sites), Townsville and Cairns. The intervention consisted of an IPS supported employment service hosted by a community mental health team. The control condition was delivered at each site by mental health teams referring consumers to other disability employment services in the local area. RESULTS: At 12 months, those in the IPS condition had 2.4 times greater odds of commencing employment than those in the control condition (42.5% vs. 23.5%). The conditions did not differ on secondary employment outcomes including job duration, hours worked, or job diversity. Attrition was higher than expected in both conditions with 28.4% completing the baseline interview but taking no further part in the study. CONCLUSION: The results support previous international findings that IPS-supported employment is more effective than non-integrated supported employment. IPS can be successfully implemented this way in Australia, but with a loss of effect strength compared to previous USA trials.
Authors: Lars de Winter; Chrisje Couwenbergh; Jaap van Weeghel; Sarita Sanches; Harry Michon; Gary R Bond Journal: Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci Date: 2022-07-11 Impact factor: 7.818
Authors: Yvonne B Suijkerbuijk; Frederieke G Schaafsma; Joost C van Mechelen; Anneli Ojajärvi; Marc Corbière; Johannes R Anema Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2017-09-12
Authors: Robert S Kern; Roberto Zarate; Shirley M Glynn; Luana R Turner; Kellie M Smith; Sharon S Mitchell; Catherine A Sugar; Morris D Bell; Robert P Liberman; Alex Kopelowicz; Michael F Green Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2018-01-13 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Isabelle Weld-Blundell; Marissa Shields; Alexandra Devine; Helen Dickinson; Anne Kavanagh; Claudia Marck Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-11-17 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Vigdis Sveinsdottir; Torill Helene Tveito; Gary R Bond; Astrid Louise Grasdal; Stein Atle Lie; Silje Endresen Reme Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2016-07-15 Impact factor: 3.295